Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2007; 01(02): 067-071
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1698316
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Stress Analysis of a Maxillary Central Incisor Restored with Different Posts

Necdet Adanir
a   Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Suleyman Demirel
,
Sema Belli
b   Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Selcuk
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
27 September 2019 (online)

  PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To evaluate the effects of different post materials on the stress distribution in an endodontically treated maxillary incisor.

Materials and Methods: A pseudo 3-dimensional finite element model was created in a labiolingual cross-sectional view of a maxillary central incisor and modified according to five posts with different physical properties consisting stainless steel, titanium, gold alloy, glass fiber (Snowpost), and carbon fiber (Composipost). A 200 N force was then applied from two different directions; a) vertical load on the incisal edge, b) 45 degree diagonal load above the cingulum location. Stress distribution and values were then calculated by considering the pseudo three dimensional von Mises stress criteria.

Results: Under two loading conditions, post made of steel showed greatest stress concentration at the post/dentin interface followed by titanium, gold alloy, Snowpost and Composipost. However, Composipost, which elastic modulus was closer to the dentin, produced highest stress values at 1/3 cervical area.

Conclusions: Within the limitation of this simulated mechanical analysis, we can conclude that the physical characteristics of posts were important on stress distributions in post and core applications. Glass fiber post revealed more balanced stress distribution under functional forces. (Eur J Dent 2007;2:67-71)

Key words

Stress analysis - Finite element method - Endodontically treated teeth - Fiber post - Metal post
 

  • References

  • 1 Plasmans PJ, Welle PR, Vrijhoef MM. In vitro resistance of composite resin dowel and cores. J Endod 1988; 14: 300-304
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Cohen S, Burns CB. Pathways of the pulp.. 7th ed. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1998: 691-717
    Google Scholar
  • 3 DeSort KD. The prosthodontic use of endodontically treated teeth: theory and biomechanics of post preparation.. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 49: 203-206
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Kern SB, von Fraunhofer JA, Mueninghoff LA. An in vitro comparison of two dowel and core techniques for endodontically treated molars.. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 51: 509-514
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Hudis SI, Goldstein GR. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a review of the literature.. J Prosthet Dent 1986; 55: 33-38
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Peters MC, Poort HW, Farah JW, Craig RG. Stress analysis of a tooth restored with a post and core.. J Dent Res 1983; 62: 760-763
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Leary JM, Jensen ME, Sheth JJ. Load transfer of posts and cores to roots through cements.. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 62: 298-302
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Loney RW, Kotowicz WE, McDowell GC. Three-dimensional photoelastic stress analysis of the ferrule effect in cast post and cores.. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 63: 506-512
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Standlee JP, Caputo AA. The retentive and stress distributing properties of split threaded endodontic dowels.. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 68: 436-442
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Farah JW, Craig RG, Sikarskie DL. Photoelastic and finite element stress analysis of a restored axisymmetric first molar.. J Biomech 1973; 6: 511-520
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Thresher RW, Saito GE. The stress analysis of human teeth.. J Biomech 1973; 6: 443-449
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Zienkiewicz OC. The finite element method.. London UK: McGraw-Hill; 1986: 0
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Wheeler RC. Dental anatomy physiology and occlusion.. London: WB Saunders; 1984: 0
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Ko CC, Chu CS, Chung KH, Lee MC. Effects of posts on dentin stress distribution in pulpless teeth.. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 68: 421-427
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Holmes DC, Diaz-Amold AM, Leary JM. Influence of post dimension on stress distribution in dentin.. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 75: 140-147
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Yaman SD, Alacam T, Yaman Y. Analysis of stress distribution in a maxillary central incisor subjected to various post and core applications.. J Endod 1998; 24: 107-111
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Lanza A, Aversa R, Rengo S, Apicella D, Apicella A. 3D FEA Stress Analysis of a Maxillary Central Incisor April 2007 - Vol.1 71 European Journal of Dentistry of cemented steel, glass and carbon posts in a maxillary incisor.. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 709-715
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Boschian Pest L, Guidotti S, Pietrabissa R, Gagliani M. Stress distribution in a post-restored tooth using the three-dimensional finite element method.. J Oral Rehabil 2006; 33: 690-697
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Ferrari M, Vichi A, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores.. Am J Dent 2000; 13: 15B-8B
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Cailleteau JG, Rieger MR, Akin JE. A comparison of intracanal stresses in a post-restored tooth utilizing the finite element method.. J Endod 1992; 18: 540-544
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Li LL, Wang ZY, Bai ZC, Mao Y, Gao B, Xin HT, Zhou B, Zhang Y, Liu B. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of weakened roots restored with different cements in combination with titanium alloy posts.. Chin Med J (Engl) 2006; 110: 305-311
    Google Scholar