CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2007; 01(02): 115-118
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1698324
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Nasal Prosthesis Rehabilitation after Partial Rhinectomy: A Clinical Report

Aslı Seçilmiş
a   Research Assistant, University of Selcuk, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, Konya, Türkiye.
,
A. Nilgün Öztürk
b   Associate Professor, University of Selcuk, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, Konya
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
15 March 2020 (online)

ABSTRACT

Facial defects resulting from neoplasms, congenital malformations, or trauma can be restorated with facial prostheses using different materials and retention methods to achieve a lifelike look and function. For the successful result, a lot of factors as harmony, texture, color matching, and blending of tissue interface of prosthesis is important. This clinical report describes treatment using a silicone prosthesis with a mechanical - retentined design for a patient who received a partial rhinectomy. Defects resulting from diseases as squamous cell carcinoma can be managed with the prosthetic rehabilitation so that the patient more comfortably and confidently resumed regular daily activity. Mechanical retention alone was sufficient to retain the prosthesis; thus, prosthetic adhesives were not necessary. (Eur J Dent 2007;2:115-118)

 
  • References

  • 1 Abou-Elhamd KE, Habib TN. The flow cytometric analysis of premalignant and malignant lesions in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.. Oral Oncology (Epub ahead of print) 2006; 0
  • 2 DiLeo MD, Miller RH, Rice JC, Butcher RB. Nasal septal squamous cell carcinoma: a chart review and meta-analysis.. Laryngoscope 1996; 106: 1218-1222
  • 3 Fleming ID, Amonette R, Monaghan T, Fleming MD. Principles of management of basal and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin.. (2 Suppl) Cancer 1995; 75: 699-704
  • 4 Atkin NB, Kay R. Prognostic significance of modal DNA value and other factors in malignant tumors based on 1465 cases.. Br J Cancer 1979; 40: 210-221
  • 5 Rowe DE, Carroll RJ, Day CL. jr Prognostic factors for local recurrence, metastasis, and survival rates in squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, ear, and lip.. Implications for treatment modality selection. J Am Acad Dermatol 1992; 26: 976-990
  • 6 Roumanas ED, Freymiller EG, Chang TL, Aghaloo T, Beumer J. 3rd Implant-retained prostheses for facial defects: an up to 14-year follow-up report on the survival rates of implants at UCLA.. Int J Prosthodont 2002; 15: 325-332
  • 7 Guttal SS, Patil NP, Shetye AD. Prosthetic rehabilitation of a midfacial defect resulting from lethal midline granuloma - a clinical report.. J Oral Rehabil 2006; 33: 863-867
  • 8 Thawley SE, Batsakis JG, Lindberg RD, Panje WR, Donley S. Comprehensive management of head and neck tumors.. St. Louis: Elsevier; 1998: 526-527
  • 9 Harrison DF, Manji F, Baelum V. Total rhinectomy-a worthwhile operation?. Laryngol Otol 1982; 96: 1113-1123
  • 10 Brånemark PI, Tolman DE. Osseointegration in craniofacial reconstruction.. Carol Stream, Illinois: Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc 1998; 93: 208
  • 11 Zemnick C, Asher ES, Wood ND, Piro N. Immediate nasal prosthetic rehabilitation following cytomegalovirus erosion: A clinical report.. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 95: 349-353
  • 12 Gurbuz A, Kalkan M, Ozturk AN, Eskitascioglu G. Nasal prosthesis rehabilitation: a case report.. Quintessence Int 2004; 35: 655-656
  • 13 McKinstry RE. Fundamentals of facial prosthetics.. Arlington, Virginia: ABI Professional Publications: 1995: 161
  • 14 Parel SM. Diminishing dependence on adhesives for retention on facial prostheses.. J Prosthet Dent 1980; 43: 552