Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2007; 01(03): 174-178
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1698334
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Reattachment of Coronal Fragment Using Fiber-Reinforced Post: A Case Report

Yahya Orcun ZORBA
a   Kırıkkale University,
,
Erdal ÖZCAN
b   Atatürk University
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
27 September 2019 (online)

  PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Coronal fractures of permanent dentition are the most frequent type of dental injury. If the original tooth fragment is retained following fracture, the natural tooth structures can be reattached using adhesive protocols. The development and use of fiber-reinforced composite root canal posts make possible of the reattachment of the crown esthetically. This case report presents a clinical technique to reattachment maxillary lateral incisor tooth after trauma using direct fiber-reinforced post systems. At the 1-year follow-up, a slightly marginal discoloration, but no recurrent decay or composite clefts were detected and the resultant appearance was acceptable to the patient. (Eur J Dent 2007;1:174-178)

Key words

Reattachment - Trauma - Fiber-reinforced post
 

  • References

  • 1 Tapias MA, Jimenez-Garcia R, Lamas F, Gil AA. Prevalence of traumatic crown fractures to permanent incisors in a childhood population, Mostoles, Spain. Dent Traumatol 2003; 19: 119-122
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Bauss O, Rohling J, Schwestka-Polly R. Prevalence of traumatic injuries to the permanent incisors in candidates for orthodontic treatment.. Dent Traumatol 2004; 20: 061-066
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Ohyama H, Nagai S, Tokutomi H, Ferguson M. Recreating an esthetic smile: a multidisciplinary approach.. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2007; 27: 061-069
    Google Scholar
  • 4 ADA council on scientific affairs. Statement on posterior resin based composite ADA council on dental benefit program. J Am Dent Assoc 1998; 129: 1627-1628
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Liebenberg WH. Partial coverage posterior ceramic restorations. Part 1: a return to diligence.. J Esthet Rest Dent 2001; 13: 296-303
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Deliperi S, Bardwell DN, Coina C. Reconstruction of devital teeth using direct-fiber reinforced composite resins: a case report.. J Adhes Dent 2005; 7: 001-007
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Villat C, Machtou P, Naulin-Ifi C. Multidisciplinary approach to the immediate esthetic repair and long-term treatment of an oblique crown-root fracture.. Dent Traumatol 2004; 20: 056-060
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Kumbuloglu O, Ozdemir N, Aksoy G, User A. A different pontic design for fiber-reinforced composite bridgeworks: A clinical report.. Eur J Dent 2007; 1: 050-053
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Spear F. When to restore, when to remove: the single debilitated tooth. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1999; 20: 316-328
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Samadzadeh A, Kugel G. Fracture strengths of provisional restorations reinforced with plasma-treated woven polyethylene fiber.. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 78: 447-449
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Qualtrough AJE, Mannocci F. Tooth-colored post systems: a review.. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 086-091
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Deliperi S, Bardwell DN, Congiu MD. A clinical challenge: Reconstruction of severely damaged endo/bleached teeth using a microhybrid composite resin. Two year case report.. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2003; 15: 221-226
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Andreasen JO. Traumatic injuries of the teeth. Copenhagen: Munksgaard; 1981: 151-195 pp
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Caliskan MK, Turkun M, Gomel M. Surgical extrusion of crown-root-fractured teeth: a clinical review.. Int Endod J 1999; 32: 146-151
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Caliskan MK, Gomel M, Turkun M. Surgical extrusion of intruded immature permanent incisors: case report and review of the literature.. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998; 86: 461-464
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Johnson RH. Lengthening clinical crowns. J Am Dent Assoc 1990; 121: 473-476
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Kocadereli I, Tasman F, Güner SB. Combined endodontic- orthodontic and prosthodontic treatment of fractured teeth. Case report.. Aust Dent J 1998; 43: 028-031
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Hayashi M, Takahashi Y, Imazato S, Ebisu S. Fracture resistance of pulpless teeth restored with post-cores and crowns.. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 477-485
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Christensen GJ. When to use fillers, build-ups or posts and cores. J Am Dent Assoc 1966; 127: 1397-1398
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Christensen GJ. Posts: necessary or unnecessary. J Am Dent Assoc 1996; 127: 1522-1524
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Torbjorner A, Karlsson S, Odman PA. Survival rate and failure characteristics for two post designs.. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 73: 439-444
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent 1999; 27: 275-278
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Deutsch AS, Cavalliari J, Musikant BL, Silverstein L, Lepley J, Petroni G. Root fracture and desing of prefabricated posts. J Prosthet Dent 1985; 53: 637-640
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Bex RT, Parker MW, Judkins JT. et al Effect of dentinal bonded resin post-core preparations on resistance to vertical root fracture.. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67: 768-772 et al
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Akkayan B, Gulmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthetic Dent 2002; 87: 431-437
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Trabert KC, Caput AA, Abou-Rass M. Tooth fracture— a comparison of endodontic and restorative treatments. J Endod 1978; 4: 341-345
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar