Effects of Different Disinfection Methods on Microleakage of Giomer RestorationsFunding None.
26 November 2019 (online)
Objectives The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the effects of different disinfection methods on microleakage of Class V Giomer restorations.
Materials and Methods Class V cavity preparation was performed on 40 sound permanent central incisors. Class V cavities (3 x 2 x 2 mm) were prepared on the buccal surfaces of the selected teeth. The teeth were randomly divided into four groups, each to be disinfected with a different method: Group 1—Disinfection with 2% chlorhexidine, Group 2—Disinfection with 6% sodium hypochlorite, Group 3—Disinfection with erbium, chromium: yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet laser, Group 4—Control (distilled water). BeautiBond adhesive and Beautifil II Giomer restoration materials were applied to all surfaces of the cavities after the disinfection of all groups. The teeth were thermocycled 5,000 times (5–55°C), and then were immersed in 0.5% methylene blue for 24 hours. After rinsing, the teeth were longitudinally sectioned and dye penetration was assessed under a stereomicroscope (40x) to evaluate microleakage.
Statistical Analysis The results were statistically evaluated by using the Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests.
Results Statistically, no significant difference was found between all four groups (p > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in microleakage scores of study groups (p > 0.05). Also, the microleakage scores of the gingival margins were significantly higher than the incisal margins (p < 0.0001).
Conclusions Application of the different cavity disinfectants has no effect on the microleakage of Class V Giomer restorations.
- 1 Türkün M, Türkün LS, Celik EU, Ateş M. Bactericidal effect of Er, Cr: YSGG laser on Streptococcus mutans. Dent Mater J 2006; 25 (01) 81-86
- 2 Manhart J, Chen HY, Mehl A, Weber K, Hickel R. Marginal quality and microleakage of adhesive class V restorations. J Dent 2001; 29 (02) 123-130
- 3 Deliperi S, Bardwell DN, Wegley C, Congiu MD. In vitro evaluation of giomers microleakage after exposure to 33% hydrogen peroxide: self-etch vs total-etch adhesives. Oper Dent 2006; 31 (02) 227-232
- 4 Gonzalez EdeH, Yap AU, Hsu SC. Demineralization inhibition of direct tooth-colored restorative materials. Oper Dent 2004; 29 (05) 578-585
- 5 Fuks AB. Pulp therapy for the primary and young permanent dentitions. Dent Clin North Am 2000; 44 (03) 571-596, vii
- 6 Salama F, Balto H, Al-Yahya F, Al-Mofareh S. The effect of cavity disinfectants on microleakage of composite restorations in primary teeth. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2015; 16 (04) 295-300
- 7 Gultz J, Do L, Boylan R, Kaim J, Scherer W. Antimicrobial activity of cavity disinfectants. Gen Dent 1999; 47 (02) 187-190
- 8 Türkün M, Türkün LS, Kalender A. Effect of cavity disinfectants on the sealing ability of nonrinsing dentin-bonding resins. Quintessence Int 2004; 35 (06) 469-476
- 9 Tulunoglu O, Ayhan H, Olmez A, Bodur H. The effect of cavity disinfectants on microleakage in dentin bonding systems. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1998; 22 (04) 299-305
- 10 Mutluay AT, Mutluay M. Sodium hypochlorite in endodontics. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni 2015; 25: 258-265
- 11 Pappas M, Burns DR, Moon PC, Coffey JP. Influence of a 3-step tooth disinfection procedure on dentin bond strength. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 93 (06) 545-550
- 12 Obeidi A, Ghasemi A, Azima A, Ansari G. Effects of pulsed Nd:YAG laser on microleakage of composite restorations in class V cavities. Photomed Laser Surg 2005; 23 (01) 56-59
- 13 Brännström M. Communication between the oral cavity and the dental pulp associated with restorative treatment. Oper Dent 1984; 9 (02) 57-68
- 14 Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Curing contraction of composites and glass-ionomer cements. J Prosthet Dent 1988; 59 (03) 297-300
- 15 Titley KC, Chernecky R, Rossouw PE, Kulkarni GV. The effect of various storage methods and media on shear-bond strengths of dental composite resin to bovine dentine. Arch Oral Biol 1998; 43 (04) 305-311
- 16 Eronat N, Yilmaz E, Kara N, Topaloglu AA. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of nano-filled resin-modified glass ionomer: an in vitro study. Eur J Dent 2014; 8 (04) 450-455
- 17 Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 1999; 27 (02) 89-99
- 18 Uno S, Finger WJ, Fritz UB. Effect of cavity design on microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer restorations. Am J Dent 1997; 10 (01) 32-35
- 19 Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Pang KM, Wei SH. Variability in microleakage observed in a total-etch wet-bonding technique under different handling conditions. J Dent Res 1995; 74 (05) 1168-1178
- 20 Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Hiller KA, Märkl A. Marginal adaption of Class V restorations with and without “softstart-polymerization”. Oper Dent 2000; 25 (01) 26-32
- 21 Yazici AR, Celik C, Dayangac B, Ozgunaltay G. Effects of different light curing units/modes on the microleakage of flowable composite resins. Eur J Dent 2008; 2 (04) 240-246
- 22 Lee BS, Lin YW, Chia JS. et al. Bactericidal effects of diode laser on Streptococcus mutans after irradiation through different thickness of dentin. Lasers Surg Med 2006; 38 (01) 62-69
- 23 Kouchi Y, Ninomiya J, Yasuda H, Fukui K, Moriyama T, Okamoto H. Location of Streptococcus mutans in the dentinal tubules of open infected root canals. J Dent Res 1980; 59 (12) 2038-2046
- 24 Schmalz G, Ergücü Z, Hiller KA. Effect of dentin on the antibacterial activity of dentin bonding agents. J Endod 2004; 30 (05) 352-358
- 25 Kucukesmen HC, Kucukesmen C. Comparison of microleakage levels of class-V hybrid composite resin restorations. Balikesir Health Sci J 2012; 1: 110-116
- 26 Walshaw PR, McComb D. Clinical considerations for optimal dentinal bonding. Quintessence Int 1996; 27 (09) 619-625