Anatomical Patterns of the Pancreatic Ductal System – A Cadaveric and Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography Study

Abstract

Introduction Morphological variants of the pancreatobiliary system can predispose to chronic pancreatitis. The goal of the present study is to assess the prevalence of pancreatic duct patterns in the Indian population, both by cadaveric dissection and by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP).

Materials and Methods A total of 15 adult pancreas specimens of unknown age and gender, and 5 fetal pancreas specimens of different gestational ages with the intact second part of duodenum, were dissected by the piecemeal method. For clinical relevance, MRCP images of 103 clinically-diagnosed chronic pancreatitis patients irrespective of their etiology were obtained retrospectively from the existing database and studied. The anatomical patterns were classified as five different types based on the course of the main pancreatic duct and the accessory pancreatic duct and their openings into the duodenal wall, including variants like pancreas divisum and ansa pancreatica.

Results In the cadaveric study, the main pancreatic duct was single with a straight course in 46.67% of the adult specimens, and in the MRCP study, the main pancreatic duct showed a descending course in 77.66% of the cases. The most common pattern was type III in both the cadaveric (80%) and radiological (55.33%) studies, and the accessory duct was absent on the MRCP in all type-III cases, while it ended blindly in the cadaveric specimens. Ansa pancreatica (type V) was observed in 1 adult specimen (6.7%), but not in the radiological study. Pancreas divisum (type IV) was observed in the 8 cases (7.76%) cases in the radiological study.

Conclusion Knowledge of the anatomical variants of the pancreatic ductal system may be helpful for the radiologists during diagnostic and therapeutic interventional procedures.

Keywords

pancreas - pancreatic ductal pattern - ansa pancreatica - pancreas divisum - magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography

Ethical Statement

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.

• References

• 1 Bang S, Suh JH, Park BK, Park SW, Song SY, Chung JB. The relationship of anatomic variation of pancreatic ductal system and pancreaticobiliary diseases. Yonsei Med J 2006; 47 (02) 243-248
• 2 Dawson W, Langman J. An anatomical-radiological study on the pancreatic duct pattern in man. Anat Rec 1961; 139 (01) 59-68
• 3 Sunjida Shahriah, Mohammad Nurunnabi AS, Johora F, Siddiqua D, Ara S. Cadaveric Study of The Anatomical Variations of The Accessory Pancreatic Duct. J Bangladesh Soc Physiol 2014; 9 (02) 83-88
• 4 Prasanna LC, Rajagopal KV, Thomas HR, Bhat KM. Accessory pancreatic duct patterns and their clinical implications. J Clin Diagn Res 2015; 9 (03) AC05-AC07
• 5 Mortelé KJ, Rocha TC, Streeter JL, Taylor AJ. Multimodality imaging of pancreatic and biliary congenital anomalies. Radiographics 2006; 26 (03) 715-731
• 6 Pavone P, Panebianco V, Laghi A. , et al. [Cholangiopancreatography with magnetic resonance in the assessment of pancreatic ducts]. Radiol Med (Torino) 1997; 94 (1-2): 61-67
• 7 Adibelli ZH, Adatepe M, Imamoglu C, Esen OS, Erkan N, Yildirim M. Anatomic variations of the pancreatic duct and their relevance with the Cambridge classification system: MRCP findings of 1158 consecutive patients. Radiol Oncol 2016; 50 (04) 370-377
• 8 Türkvatan A, Erden A, Türkoğlu MA, Yener Ö. Congenital variants and anomalies of the pancreas and pancreatic duct: imaging by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography and multidetector computed tomography. Korean J Radiol 2013; 14 (06) 905-913
• 9 Moore KL, Persaud TVN, Torchia MG. The developing human: clinically oriented embryology. 9th Ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders/Elsevier; 2013: 540
• 10 Sadler TW. Langman's Medical embryology. 8th Ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000: 306
• 11 Shu J, Zhang XM, Zeng N. Normal pancreatic duct: evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography. Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology. 2006; 4: 2004-2006
• 12 Ara S, Shahriah S, Begum S. The length of main pancreatic duct in Bangladeshi cadaver at different age groups. Mymensingh Med J 2011; 20 (02) 298-302
• 13 Govindraj N, Shabna C. Variations in the duct system of pancreas: a cadaveric study. Int J Anat Res. 2017; 5 (3.1): 4136-4143
• 14 Kang JK, Chung JB, Moon YM, Choi HJ. The normal endoscopic pancreatogram in Koreans. Korean J Intern Med 1989; 4 (01) 74-79
• 15 Kochhar R, Goenka MK, Nagi B, Aggarwal R, Singh K. Normal pancreatic duct morphology in a north Indian population. Trop Gastroenterol 1996; 17 (04) 223-225
• 16 Sahni D, Jit I. , Harjeet. Gross anatomy of the pancreatic ducts in north Indians. Trop Gastroenterol 2001; 22 (04) 197-201
• 17 Bülow R, Simon P, Thiel R. , et al. Anatomic variants of the pancreatic duct and their clinical relevance: an MR-guided study in the general population. Eur Radiol 2014; 24 (12) 3142-3149
• 18 Dimitriou I, Katsourakis A, Nikolaidou E, Noussios G. The Main Anatomical Variations of the Pancreatic Duct System: Review of the Literature and Its Importance in Surgical Practice. J Clin Med Res 2018; 10 (05) 370-375
• 19 DiMagno MJ, Wamsteker E-J. Pancreas divisum. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2011; 13 (02) 150-156
• 20 Kuzel AR, Lodhi MU, Rahim M. Pancreatic Divisum: An Unusual Cause of Chronic Pancreatitis in a Young Patient. Cureus 2017; 9 (11) e1856
• 21 Kamisawa T, Okamoto A. Pancreatographic investigation of pancreatic duct system and pancreaticobiliary malformation. J Anat 2008; 212 (02) 125-134
• 22 Hayashi TY, Gonoi W, Yoshikawa T, Hayashi N, Ohtomo K. Ansa pancreatica as a predisposing factor for recurrent acute pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22 (40) 8940-8948
• 23 Barkay O, Fogel EL, Watkins JL, McHenry L, Lehman GA, Sherman S. Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 7 (09) 931-943
• 24 Wilasrusmee C, Pongchairerks P. Pancreaticobiliary ductal anatomy in Thai people. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 1999; 6 (01) 79-85