CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Revista Chilena de Ortopedia y Traumatología 2019; 60(03): 086-090
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1698794
Original Article | Artículo Original
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Encuesta sobre el manejo de injertos del ligamento cruzado anterior contaminados accidentalmente

Survey on management of accidentally contaminated anterior cruciate ligament grafts
Francisco Figueroa
1   Departamento de Cirugía Ortopédica, Clínica Alemana de Santiago-Universidad del Desarrollo Medical School, Santiago, Chile
,
David Figueroa
1   Departamento de Cirugía Ortopédica, Clínica Alemana de Santiago-Universidad del Desarrollo Medical School, Santiago, Chile
,
Rafael Calvo
1   Departamento de Cirugía Ortopédica, Clínica Alemana de Santiago-Universidad del Desarrollo Medical School, Santiago, Chile
,
1   Departamento de Cirugía Ortopédica, Clínica Alemana de Santiago-Universidad del Desarrollo Medical School, Santiago, Chile
,
1   Departamento de Cirugía Ortopédica, Clínica Alemana de Santiago-Universidad del Desarrollo Medical School, Santiago, Chile
,
Rafael Calvo Mena
1   Departamento de Cirugía Ortopédica, Clínica Alemana de Santiago-Universidad del Desarrollo Medical School, Santiago, Chile
,
1   Departamento de Cirugía Ortopédica, Clínica Alemana de Santiago-Universidad del Desarrollo Medical School, Santiago, Chile
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

15 January 2019

10 September 2019

Publication Date:
01 November 2019 (online)

Resumen

Objetivo Encuestar a cirujanos de rodilla en Chile, sobre su conducta en contaminaciones accidentales del injerto, en reconstrucciones de ligamento cruzado anterior (LCA).

Métodos Se realizó una encuesta anónima en relación a la incidencia, tratamiento y resultados clínicos de los injertos de LCA contaminados, a todos los médicos pertenecientes al área de traumatología y ortopedia asistentes al congreso Ateneo de rodilla 2015.

Resultados Se encuestaron 54 médicos, 33 (61%) especialistas en cirugía de rodilla y 21 (39%) médicos en formación. De los cirujanos de rodilla, 15 (45%) reportaron al menos un caso de contaminación, de los cuales 12 (80%) informaron un único evento, 3 (20%) indicaron la eventualidad en 2, 3 y 5 ocasiones respectivamente, para un total de 22 injertos contaminados. De los cirujanos que reportaron injertos contaminados, 11 (73%) realizan 50 o más reconstrucciones al año. La decisión tomada en los casos de contaminación fue en 13 oportunidades (59%), lavar el injerto y utilizarlo de acuerdo al plan inicial; en 6 casos (27%), utilizar aloinjerto; en 2 ocasiones (9%), utilizar autoinjerto alternativo; y en 1 oportunidad (5%); triplicar el semitendinoso. Ninguno de los casos de contaminación reportó infecciones.

Conclusiones En casos de una contaminación accidental, la mayoría de los cirujanos encuestados prefieren optar por la descontaminación del injerto y su utilización en la reconstrucción de acuerdo al plan inicial; para lo cual la clorhexidina y antibióticos sería la solución a usar de preferencia.

Nivel de Evidencia Nivel V, opinión de experto.

Abstract

Objective To survey knee surgeons who perform anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in Chile, about the management when ACL graft contamination occurs.

Methods An anonymous survey was conducted to all physicians belonging to the area of traumatology and orthopedics who attended the 2015 annual Chilean Knee Society meeting. The survey questioned the incidence, treatment, and outcomes of ACL graft contaminations.

Results Fifty-four physicians were surveyed, of which 33 (61%) where knee surgeons and 21 (39%) physicians in training. Of the 33 knee surgeons, 15 (45%) reported at least one contamination during their career. Of those 15, 12 (80%) had one event, and three surgeons (20%) informed having 2, 3, and 5 episodes respectively, for a total of 22 reported contaminated grafts. Of the surgeons who reported a contaminated graft, 11 (73%) performed 50 or more ACL reconstructions annually. In 13 opportunities (59%) the management for a contaminated graft was cleansing the graft and proceeding as planned. In 6 cases (27%) an allograft was used, in 2 occasions (9%) a different graft was harvested, and in 1 opportunity (5%) a semitendinosus graft triplication was performed. No infections in any of the contaminated grafts were reported.

Conclusions In case of accidental graft contamination during an ACL reconstruction, knee surgeons most often preferred disinfecting the graft and using it as the initial plan.

Level of Evidence Level V, expert opinion.

 
  • Bibliografía

  • 1 Frank M, Schmucker U, David S, Matthes G, Ekkernkamp A, Seifert J. Devastating femoral osteomyelitis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports TraumatolArthrosc 2008; 16 (01) 71-74
  • 2 Judd D, Bottoni C, Kim D, Burke M, Hooker S. Infections following arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2006; 22 (04) 375-384
  • 3 Mei-Dan O, Mann G, Steinbacher G, Ballester SJ, Cugat RB, Alvarez PD. Septic arthritis with Staphylococcus lugdunensis following arthroscopic ACL revision with BPTB allograft. Knee Surg Sports TraumatolArthrosc 2008; 16 (01) 15-18
  • 4 Schollin-Borg M, Michaëlsson K, Rahme H. Presentation, outcome, and cause of septic arthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a case control study. Arthroscopy 2003; 19 (09) 941-947
  • 5 Izquierdo Jr R, Cadet ER, Bauer R, Stanwood W, Levine WN, Ahmad CS. A survey of sports medicine specialists investigating the preferred management of contaminated anterior cruciate ligament grafts. Arthroscopy 2005; 21 (11) 1348-1353
  • 6 Eddy DM. Clinical decision making: from theory to practice. Designing a practice policy. Standards, guidelines, and options. JAMA 1990; 263 (22) 3077-3084 , 3081, 3084
  • 7 Han Y, Giannitsios D, Duke K, Steffen T, Burman M. Biomechanical analysis of chlorhexidine power irrigation to disinfect contaminated anterior cruciate ligament grafts. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39 (07) 1528-1533
  • 8 Goebel ME, Drez Jr D, Heck SB, Stoma MK. Contaminated rabbit patellar tendon grafts. In vivo analysis of disinfecting methods. Am J Sports Med 1994; 22 (03) 387-391
  • 9 Parker RD, Maschke SD. Mechanical agitation and serial dilution: an option for anterior cruciate ligament graft sterilization. J Knee Surg 2008; 21 (03) 186-191
  • 10 Burd T, Conroy BP, Meyer SC, Allen WC. The effects of chlorhexidine irrigation solution on contaminated bone-tendon allografts. Am J Sports Med 2000; 28 (02) 241-244 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10751002 [Internet]
  • 11 Molina ME, Nonweiller DE, Evans JA, Delee JC. Contaminated anterior cruciate ligament grafts: the efficacy of 3 sterilization agents. Arthroscopy 2000; 16 (04) 373-378
  • 12 Oosterwaal PJM, Mikx FHM, van den Brink ME, Renggli HH. Bactericidal concentrations of chlorhexidine-digluconate, amine fluoride gel and stannous fluoride gel for subgingival bacteria tested in serum at short contact times. J Periodontal Res 1989; 24 (02) 155-160
  • 13 Sobel AD, Hohman D, Jones J, Bisson LJ. Chlorhexidine gluconate cleansing has no effect on the structural properties of human patellar tendon allografts. Arthroscopy 2012; 28 (12) 1862-1866 . Doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.05.888
  • 14 Alomar AZ, Gawri R, Roughley PJ, Haglund L, Burman M. The effects of chlorhexidine graft decontamination on tendon graft collagen and cell viability. Am J Sports Med 2012; 40 (07) 1646-1653
  • 15 Jackson DW, Corsetti J, Simon TM. Biologic incorporation of allograft anterior cruciate ligament replacements. Clin OrthopRelat Res. United States; 1996: 126-33