Correlation between the Condyle Position and Intra-Extraarticular Clinical Findings of Temporomandibular Dysfunction

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To investigate the relationship between different clinical findings and condyle position. Methods: Tenderness on masseter (MM), temporal (TM), lateral pyterigoid (LPM), medial pyterigoid (MPM) and posterior cervical (PSM) muscles, limitation, deviation and deflection in opening of mouth, clicking, crepitating, tenderness on lateral palpation of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) area for each side of 85 patients were evaluated. Each side of patients was categorized into the clinical findings: no sign and/or symptom of temporomandibular dysfunctions (TMDs), only extraarticular findings and only intraarticular findings, extra and intraarticular findings. Condyle positions of 170 TMJs were determined the narrowest anterior (a) and posterior interarticular distance (p) on midsagittal MRIs of condyles and expressed as p/a ratio and these ratio were transformed into logarithmic base e. Spearman’s Correlation was used to investigate the relationship between the condyle position and the clinical findings. The difference between the condyle positions of different groups was tested by T test. Reliability statistic was used to determine intra-observer concordance of two measurements of condylar position. Results: A significant relationship was found between the condyle position and tenderness of PSM. There was no significant difference between the groups in aspect of the condyle position. Occlusion and condyle position correlated with significantly. Conclusions: The inclination of the upper cervical spine and craniocervical angulations can cause the signs and symptoms of TMD and condyle position is not main cause of TMDs alone but it may be effective together with other possible etiological factors synergistically. (Eur J Dent 2011;5:354-360)

Key words:

Condyle - Temporomandibular dysfunction - MRI

• REFERENCES

• 1 Goldstein BH. Temporomandibular disorders: a review of current understanding. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999;88:379-385.
• 2 Okeson JP. Management of temporomandibular disorders and occlusion. Mosby-Year Book, St. Louis, Missouri, 1998, 4th ed, P. 298.
• 3 Gateno J, Anderson PB, Xia JJ, Horng JC, Teichgraeber JF, Liebschner MA. A comparative assessment of mandibular condylar position in patients with anterior disc displacement of temporomandibular joint. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62:39-43.
• 4 Incesu L, Taşkaya-Yilmaz N, Oğütcen-Toller M, Uzun E. Relationship of condylar position to disc position and morphology. Eur J Radiol 2004;51:269-273.
• 5 Serra MD, Gaviao MBD. Evaluation of condyler position from transcranial projections in primary dentition. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006;35:110-116.
• 6 Bonilla-Aragon H, Tallents RH, Katzberg RW, Kyrkanides S, Moss ME. Condyle position as a predictor of temporomandibular joint internal derangement. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:205-208.
• 7 Brand JW, Whinery JG Jr, Anderson QN, Keenan KM. Condylar position as a predictor of temporomandibular joint internal derangement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989;67:469-476.
• 8 Bean LR, Thomas CA. Significance of condylar positions in patients with temporomandibular disorders. J Am Dent Assoc 1987;114:76-77.
• 9 Vasconcelos Filho JO, Menezes AV, Freitas DQ, Manzi FR, Bóscolo FN, de Almeida SM. Condylar and disk position and signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders in stress-free subjects. JADA 2007;138:1251-1255.
• 10 Weinberg LA. Role of condylar position in TMJ dysfunctionpain syndrome. J Prosthet Dent 1979;41:636-643.
• 11 Blaschke DD, Blaschke TJ. A method for quantitatively determining temporomandibular joint bony relationships. J Dent Res 1981;60:35-43.
• 12 Blaschke DD, Blaschke TJ. Normal TMJ bony relationships in centric occlusion. J Dent Res 1981;60:98-104.
• 13 Pullinger A, Hollender L. Assessment of mandibular condyle position: A comparison of transcranial radiographs and linear tomograms. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1985;60:329-334.
• 14 Pullinger A, Hollender L. Variation in condyle-fossa relationships according to different methods of evaluation in tomograms. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1986;62:719- 727.
• 15 Olivo SA, Bravo J, Magee DJ, Thie NM, Major PW, Flores- Mir C. The association between head and cervical posture and temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review. J Orofac Pain 2006;20:9-23.
• 16 Sonnesen L, Bakke M, Solow B. Temporomandibular disorders in relation to craniofacial dimensions, head posture and bite force in children selected for orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod 2001;23:179-192.
• 17 Ries LG, Alves MC, Bérzin F. Asymmetric activation of temporalis, masseter, and sternocleidomastoid muscles in temporomandibular disorder patients. Cranio 2008;26:59- 64.
• 18 Cohlmia JT, Ghosh J, Sinha PK, Nanda RS, Currier GF. Tomographic assessment of temporomandibular joints in patients with malocclusion. Angle Orthod 1996;66:27-35.
• 19 Langberg BJ, Arai K, Miner RM. Transverse skeletal and dental asymmetry in adults with unilateral lingual posterior crossbite. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;127:6- 15.
• 20 Munhoz WC, Marques AP, Siqueira JT. Radiographic evaluation of cervical spine of subjects with temporomandibular joint internal disorder. Braz Oral Res 2004;18:283-289.
• 21 Stamm T, Hohoff A, Van Meegen A, Meyer U. On the threedimensional physiological position of the temporomandibular joint. J Orofac Orthop 2004;65:280-289.