CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Plast Surg 2009; 42(S 01): S91-S101
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1699381
Review Article
Association of Plastic Surgeons of India

Functional and aesthetic correction of secondary unilateral cleft lip nasal deformities

Mimis Cohen
The Craniofacial Centre and the Division of Plastic, Reconstructive and Cosmetic Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, USA
,
David E. Morris
The Craniofacial Centre and the Division of Plastic, Reconstructive and Cosmetic Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, USA
,
Aisha D. White
The Craniofacial Centre and the Division of Plastic, Reconstructive and Cosmetic Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, USA
,
Pravin Patel
The Craniofacial Centre and the Division of Plastic, Reconstructive and Cosmetic Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
15 January 2020 (online)

ABSTRACT

The treatment of patients with unilateral cleft lip has undergone significant development during the last decades. With better understanding of the anatomy of the unilateral cleft lip and nasal deformities, primary correction of the nasal deformity at the time of lip repair, critical evaluation of short and long-term results following various treatment protocols, and constant striving for perfection in both aesthetics and function, we have been able to design improved treatment strategies and more accurate surgical techniques so as to achieve overall superior and long-lasting results. In this review article, we present our protocols and experience for functional and aesthetic correction of secondary unilateral cleft lip nasal deformities and a retrospective review of 219 consecutive patients treated at our Craniofacial Centre for correction of secondary unilateral cleft lip nasal deformities. The protocols used in the treatment of 219 consecutive patients at our Craniofacial Centre for correction of secondary unilateral cleft lip nasal deformities were reviewed. In addition, analysis of the most recent 51 consecutive patients who underwent complete clinical and functional evaluation with rhinomanometry followed by correction of the cleft lip nasal deformity was performed. A variety of time-honoured techniques of rhinoplasty were applied in the correction of the residual deformities to achieve symmetry, aesthetic balance, and functional correction of the nose. Follow-up ranged from 5-11 years. Analysis of the data revealed that 39 patients (76.47%) had significant functional and aesthetic improvement; seven patients (13.07%) had significant aesthetic improvement but a modest functional improvement; and five patients (9.8%) required additional surgery to improve their appearance and had no functional improvement. Further analysis demonstrated that five out of seven patients in the second group had pharyngeal flaps in place that were primarily responsible for the airway obstruction. No attempt was made to revise the ports of these flaps because the speech was excellent. The surgical plan is based on the information gained from our extensive clinical evaluation and is tailored to the patient's specific functional and aesthetic needs.

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Sadove AM, Eppley BI. Correction of secondary cleft lip and nasal deformities. Clin Plast Surg 1993;20:793-801.
  • 2 Stahl S, Hollier L. Correction of secondary deformities of the cleft lip nose. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;109:1386-92.
  • 3 Cohen M, Smith BE, Daw JL. Secondary unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity: functional and aesthetic reconstruction. J Craniofac Surg 2003;14:584-93.
  • 4 Thurston JB, Larson DL, Shanks JC, Bennett JE, Parsons RW. Nasal obstructions a complication of pharyngeal flap surgery. Cleft Palate J 1980;17:148-54.
  • 5 Cohen M. Secondary correction of the nasal deformity associated with cleft lip. In: Cohen M, editor. Mastery of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Vol. 1. Boston: Little, brown and Company; 1994. p. 702-19.
  • 6 Cohen M, Smith BE. Cleft lip and Palate. In: Goldwyn RM, Cohen M, editors. The unfavorable Result in Plastic Surgery: Avoidance and Treatment. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins; 2001. p. 303-33.
  • 7 McComb H. Treatment of the unilateral cleft lip nose. Plast Reconstr Surg 1975;55:596-601.
  • 8 Anderl H. Simultaneous repair of lip and nose in the unilateral cleft lip: a long term report. In: Jackson IT, Sommerland BC, editors. Recent Advances in Plastic Surgery. Vol. 3. Edinburgh: Livingstone; 1985. p. 1-11.
  • 9 Salyer KA. Primary correction of the unilateral cleft lip nose deformity: a 15 year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993;77:558-66.
  • 10 Bird SH, El-Musa KA, Yazdani A. Definitive repair of the unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;120:1348-56.
  • 11 McComb HK, Coughlin BA. Primary repair of the unilateral cleft lip nose: completion of a longitudinal study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1996;33:23-31.
  • 12 Grayson BH, Cutting CB. Presurgical nasoalveolar orthopedic molding in primary correction of the nose, lip and alveolus of infants born with unilateral and bilateral clefts. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2001;38:193-8.
  • 13 Liou E, Subramanian M, Chen PK, Huang CS. The progressive changes of nasal symmetry and growth after nasoalveolar molding: a three-year follow-up study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;114:858-64.
  • 14 Kane AA, Pilgram TK, Moslin M, Marsh JL. Long-term outcome of cleft lip nasal reconstruction in childhood. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;105:1600-8.
  • 15 Salomon J, Hobar CP. Cleft lip II: Secondary deformities. In: Selected Readings in Plastic Surgery. Dallas, TX: Selected Readings in Plastic Surgery Inc; 1997. p. 10-22.
  • 16 Hurwitz DJ, Ashby ER, Llull R, Pasqual J, Tabor C, Garrison L, et al. Computer-assisted anthropometry for outcome assessment of cleft lip. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;103:1608-23.
  • 17 Laitung JK, Coghlan BA, Pigott RW. A comparison of computer versus panel assessment of two groups of patients with cleft lip and palate. Br J Plast Surg 1993;46:18-21.
  • 18 Guyuron B. MOC-PS CME article: late cleft lip nasal deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;121:1-11.
  • 19 Warren DW, Hairfield MW. The nasal airway in cleft palate. In: Bardach J, Morris HL, editors. Multidisciplinary Management of Cleft Lip and Palate. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1990. p. 668-92.
  • 20 Kimmelman CP. The systemic effects of nasal obstruction. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1989;22:461-6.
  • 21 Cooper BC. Nasorespiratory function and orofacial development. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1989;22:413-40.
  • 22 Koler M. Residual deformities after repair of clefts of the lip and palate. Clin Plast Surg 2004;31:331-45.
  • 23 Smith BE, Guyette TW. Component approach for partitioning nasal airway resistance: pharyngeal flap case studies. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1993;30:78-81.