Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Plast Surg 2010; 43(01): 029-033
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1699399
Original Article
Association of Plastic Surgeons of India

The acute management of acid assault burns: A pragmatic approach

A. Burd
Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong
,
K. Ahmed
Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
08 January 2020 (online)

Also available at
  PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

This case series comprises 31 patients who were victims of acid assault burns. They were admitted for acute or reconstructive care to a regional burns unit. Ten patients were admitted late with suboptimal acute care and needed a total of 50 reconstructive procedures. Of 13 patients admitted acutely, 7 had surgery performed after 48 hours of constant lavage while seven had urgent surgical debridement within 48 hours, followed by lavage. Although the number of reconstructive procedures performed in these two groups was similar, i.e., 20 and 19, respectively, the magnitude of the deformity in the urgent surgery group was significantly less than in the conventional surgery group. As in many cases of acute burns care, determining the evidence for best practice using a prospective, randomised, controlled comparison of conventional versus urgent surgery is difficult in view of the small number of cases involved. However, basing surgical practice on ethical principles, and in particular ‘primum non nocere,’ we propose that the urgent reduction of the chemical load on the skin by surgical debridement is appropriate in selected cases and should be considered in the acute management of these devastating injuries.

KEY WORDS

Acute management - chemical assault - surgical timing
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Mannan A, Ghani S, Clarke A, Butler PE. Cases of chemical assault worldwide: A literature review. Burns 2007;33:149-54.
  • 2 Faga A, Scevola D, Mezzetti MG, Scevola S. Sulphuric acid burned women in Bangladesh: A social and medical problem. Burns 2000;26:701-9.
  • 3 Young RC, Ho WS, Ying SY, Burd A. Chemical assaults in Hong Kong: A 10-year review. Burns 2002;28:651-3.
  • 4 Atiyeh BS, Gunn SW, Hayek SN. State of the art in burn treatment. World J Surg 2005;29:131-48.
  • 5 Kao CC, Garner WL. Acute burns. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;105:2482-92.
  • 6 Yeong EK, Chen MT, Mann R, Lin TW, Engrav LH. Facial mutilation after an assault with chemicals: 15 cases and literature review. J Burn Care Rehabil 1997;18:234-7.
  • 7 Childs C. Is there an evidence-based practice for burns? Burns 1998;24:29-33.
  • 8 Knobloch K, Gohritz A, Spies M, Rennekampff HO, Vogt PM. Evidence-based medicine in BURNS revisited - The need for the CONSORT criteria. Burns 2009;35:156-7.
  • 9 Burd A. Plastic surgery, body image and the blind. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2007;60:1273-6.
  • 10 Falder S, Browne A, Edgar D, Staples E, Fong J, Rea S, et al. Core outcomes for adult burn survivors: A clinical overview. Burns 2009;35:618-41.