CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) 2020; 55(03): 298-303
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1700833
Artigo Original
Coluna
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. Published by Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Age - Does it really count? A study of the Perioperative Morbidity and Long-Term Outcome in Patients Above 70 Years of Age Undergoing Spine surgery for Lumbar Degenerative Disorders[*]

Article in several languages: português | English
1   Departamento de Ortopedia, P. D. Hinduja National Hospital e Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, India
,
Siddharth Shah
1   Departamento de Ortopedia, P. D. Hinduja National Hospital e Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, India
,
Ravi Ranjan Rai
1   Departamento de Ortopedia, P. D. Hinduja National Hospital e Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, India
,
Samir Dalvie
1   Departamento de Ortopedia, P. D. Hinduja National Hospital e Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, India
,
Joseph Monteiro
1   Departamento de Ortopedia, P. D. Hinduja National Hospital e Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, India
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

28 September 2018

05 February 2019

Publication Date:
19 December 2019 (online)

Abstract

Objective To assess the long-term outcome and perioperative morbidity in spine surgeries for lumbar degenerative disorders and, thereby, to evaluate the safety of surgery in the aging population.

Methods Retrospective study of patients aged > 70 years, operated for degenerative lumbar disorders between 2011 and 2015. We evaluated patient demographic, clinical and surgical data; comorbidities, perioperative complications, pre & postoperative pain scores and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores, patient satisfaction and overall mortality.

Results A total of 103 patients (Males: Females55:48) with mean age 74.6 years (70–85yrs) were studied. 60 patients (58.2%) had decompression alone, while 43 (41.8%) had decompression & fusion. Mean hospital stay was 5.7days. Mean follow-up was 47.6months (24–73mnths). Patients reported significant improvement in backpain (Numerical pain score 7.7 vs 1.6; p < 0.001), leg pain (Numerical pain score 7.4 vs 1.7; p < 0.001), disability (ODI 82.3 vs 19.1; p < 0.001) and walking distance (p < 0.001). 76% patients were satisfied with the results at the time of final follow-up. 26 patients (25.24%) had perioperative complications which were all minor, without mortality. Most common intraoperative & postoperative complications were dural tear (6.79%) & urinary tract infection (6.79%) respectively.

Conclusions With meticulous perioperative care lumbar spine surgery is safe and effective in elderly population. Patients had longer mean hospital stay in view of the gradual and comprehensive rehabilitation program. Presence of comorbidities or minor perioperative complications did not increase the overall morbidity or affect the clinical outcomes of surgery in our study.

* Study conducted in the Department of Orthopaedics, P.D Hinduja National Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, India.


 
  • Referências

  • 1 Central Statistics Office. Ministry of Statistics and Programme implementation, Government of India. Elderly in India 2016 . Disponível em: mospi.nic.in/sites/default/files/.../ElderlyinIndia_2016.pdf
  • 2 Katz JN, Lipson SJ, Larson MG, McInnes JM, Fossel AH, Liang MH. The outcome of decompressive laminectomy for degenerative lumbar stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991; 73 (06) 809-816
  • 3 Esses SI, Huler RJ. Indications for lumbar spine fusion in the adult. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992; (279) 87-100
  • 4 Sanderson PL, Wood PL. Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in old people. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1993; 75 (03) 393-397
  • 5 Ragab AA, Fye MA, Bohlman HH. Surgery of the lumbar spine for spinal stenosis in 118 patients 70 years of age or older. Spine 2003; 28 (04) 348-353
  • 6 Panjabi MM. Clinical spinal instability and low back pain. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2003; 13 (04) 371-379
  • 7 Shabat S, Arinzon Z, Folman Y. , et al. Long-term outcome of decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in octogenarians. Eur Spine J 2008; 17 (02) 193-198
  • 8 Smorgick Y, Baker KC, Herkowitz H. , et al. Predisposing factors for dural tear in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 2015; 22 (05) 483-486
  • 9 Yoshihara H, Yoneoka D. Incidental dural tear in spine surgery: analysis of a nationwide database. Eur Spine J 2014; 23 (02) 389-394
  • 10 Rihn JA, Hilibrand AS, Zhao W. , et al. Effectiveness of surgery for lumbar stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis in the octogenarian population: analysis of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) data. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97 (03) 177-185
  • 11 Lee JY, Moon SH, Suh BK, Yang MH, Park MS. Outcome and Complications in Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Stenosis or Spondylolisthesis in Geriatric Patients. Yonsei Med J 2015; 56 (05) 1199-1205
  • 12 Oldridge NB, Yuan Z, Stoll JE, Rimm AR. Lumbar spine surgery and mortality among Medicare beneficiaries, 1986. Am J Public Health 1994; 84 (08) 1292-1298
  • 13 Jakola AS, Sørlie A, Gulati S, Nygaard OP, Lydersen S, Solberg T. Clinical outcomes and safety assessment in elderly patients undergoing decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective study. BMC Surg 2010; 10: 34
  • 14 Arinzon ZH, Fredman B, Zohar E. , et al. Surgical management of spinal stenosis: a comparison of immediate and long term outcome in two geriatric patient populations. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2003; 36 (03) 273-279