CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) 2020; 55(02): 156-162
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3400520
Artigo Original
Básica
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. Published by Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Antisepsis Techniques in Orthopedic Surgical Procedures: A Comparative Study[*]

Artikel in mehreren Sprachen: português | English
1   Universidade do Vale do Sapucaí, Pouso Alegre, Minas Gerais, MG, Brasil
2   Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital das Clínicas Samuel Libânio, Pouso Alegre, Minas Gerais, MG, Brasil
,
Mauro de Castro Carvalho
2   Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital das Clínicas Samuel Libânio, Pouso Alegre, Minas Gerais, MG, Brasil
,
Rafael Baroni Carvalho
2   Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital das Clínicas Samuel Libânio, Pouso Alegre, Minas Gerais, MG, Brasil
,
Célio Alves Ferraz
2   Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital das Clínicas Samuel Libânio, Pouso Alegre, Minas Gerais, MG, Brasil
,
Diba Maria S.T. Souza
1   Universidade do Vale do Sapucaí, Pouso Alegre, Minas Gerais, MG, Brasil
,
Taylor B. Schnaider
1   Universidade do Vale do Sapucaí, Pouso Alegre, Minas Gerais, MG, Brasil
2   Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital das Clínicas Samuel Libânio, Pouso Alegre, Minas Gerais, MG, Brasil
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

16. August 2018

08. Januar 2019

Publikationsdatum:
07. Februar 2020 (online)

Abstract

Objective To compare antisepsis techniques using chlorhexidine-based soap associated with ethyl alcohol and alcohol-based chlorhexidine or chlorhexidine-based soap associated with alcohol-based chlorhexidine alone in surgical orthopedic procedures.

Methods This is a primary, randomized, analytical and single-center clinical trial consisting of 170 patients, who were divided into 2 groups. The combinations chlorhexidine-based soap + alcohol-based chlorhexidine (CSAC) and chlorhexidine-based soap + 70% ethyl alcohol + alcohol-based chlorhexidine (CSAAC) were tested in each group. The cultures were grown in mannitol and eosin methylene blue (EMB) after collection before skin preparation (time point 0), after skin preparation (time point 1) and at the end of the surgical procedure (time point 2).

Results There was no statistically significant difference regarding bacterial growth in mannitol and EMB between the groups at any time point. Moreover, there was no statistical difference between groups and time points regarding the type of bacterial growth in culture media.

Conclusion There was no difference between these antisepsis techniques for the prevention of surgical site infection in orthopedic procedures; in addition, a protocol containing measures to prevent infection in such procedures was developed.

* Study performed at Hospital das Clínicas Samuel Libânio, Pouso Alegre, MG, Brazil.