CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Academic Ophthalmology 2019; 11(02): e49-e53
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3400545
Research Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

An Ophthalmology Resident-Led Quality Improvement Initiative to Decrease the Incidence of Perioperative Corneal Injury

1   Department of Ophthalmology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
,
Mark Goerlitz-Jessen
2   Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
,
Ingrid U. Scott
1   Department of Ophthalmology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
3   Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
,
Erik Lehman
3   Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
,
Tabassum Ali
4   Delaware Ophthalmology Consultants, Wilmington, Delaware
,
Denise Kerchner
5   Elmwood Eye Center, York, Pennsylvania
,
David Liang
6   Department of Ophthalmology, Central Texas Veterans Administration, Temple, Texas
› Author Affiliations
Acknowledgements: E.L. received support from the National Institutes of Health, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002, UL1 TR002014. Funding for statistical analysis was provided by the CTSA grant and the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
Further Information

Publication History

22 August 2019

16 October 2019

Publication Date:
04 December 2019 (online)

Abstract

Objective This article evaluates the effectiveness of an ophthalmology resident-led quality improvement (QI) initiative to decrease the incidence of perioperative corneal injury at an academic medical center

Design Retrospective chart review.

Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted of all surgical cases performed 6 months prior to, and 6 months after, implementation of an ophthalmology resident-led QI initiative at an academic medical center. The QI initiative (which focused on perioperative corneal injury awareness, understanding of risk factors, and presentation of an algorithm designed to prevent perioperative corneal injury) consisted of a lecture and distribution of educational materials to anesthesia providers. Data collected through the chart review included type of surgical case, presence of diabetes mellitus or thyroid disease, patient age and gender, patient positioning (supine, prone, or lateral), level of anesthesia provider training, length of surgical case, surgical service, type of anesthesia, and type (if any) of perioperative eye injury. The rates of perioperative corneal injury pre- versus post-initiative were compared.

Results The rates of perioperative corneal injury pre- and post-initiative were 3.7 and 1.9 per 1,000, respectively (p = 0.012). Significant risk factors for perioperative corneal injury include longer duration of surgery (odds ratio [OR] 90–180 vs. < 90 minutes = 4.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.43–12.18; OR > 180 vs. < 90 minutes = 8.56, 95% CI 3.01–24.32; OR > 180 vs. 90–180 = 2.05, 95% CI 1.17–3.58), patient position lateral > prone > supine (OR prone vs. lateral = 0.25, 95% CI 0.09–0.67; OR supine vs. lateral = 0.13, 95% CI 0.07–0.23), nonhead and neck surgeries (OR = 0.32, 95% CI 0.11–0.87), and surgery performed under the general surgery service (OR general surgery service vs. other subspecialty services = 6.50, 95% CI 2.39–24.76).

Conclusions An ophthalmology resident-led QI initiative consisting of educating anesthesia providers was associated with a significant decrease in the rate of perioperative corneal injury.

 
  • References

  • 1 Martin DP, Weingarten TN, Gunn PW. , et al. Performance improvement system and postoperative corneal injuries: incidence and risk factors. Anesthesiology 2009; 111 (02) 320-326
  • 2 Gild WM, Posner KL, Caplan RA, Cheney FW. Eye injuries associated with anesthesia. A closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology 1992; 76 (02) 204-208
  • 3 Posner KL, Lee L. Anesthesia malpractice claims associated with eye surgery and eye injury: highlights from the anesthesia closed claims project data request service. ASA Newsl 2014; 78 (11) 28-30
  • 4 White E, Crosse MM. The aetiology and prevention of peri-operative corneal abrasions. Anaesthesia 1998; 53 (02) 157-161
  • 5 Brock-Utne JG, Botz G, Jaffe RA. Perioperative corneal abrasions. Anesthesiology 1992; 77 (01) 221
  • 6 Liu H-Y, Yeh PT, Kuo KT. , et al. Toxic keratopathy following the use of alcohol-containing antiseptics in nonocular surgery. JAMA Ophthalmol 2016; 134 (04) 449-452
  • 7 Fraser S. Corneal abrasion. Clin Ophthalmol 2010; 4: 387-390
  • 8 Wilson SA, Last A. Management of corneal abrasions. Am Fam Physician 2004; 70 (01) 123-128
  • 9 Carter JA, Utiger RD. The ophthalmopathy of Graves' disease. Annu Rev Med 1992; 43: 487-495
  • 10 Cousen P, Cackett P, Bennett H, Swa K, Dhillon B. Tear production and corneal sensitivity in diabetes. J Diabetes Complications 2007; 21 (06) 371-373
  • 11 Batra YK, Bali IM. Corneal abrasions during general anesthesia. Anesthesia and Analgesia 1977; 56 (03) 363-365
  • 12 Yu HD, Chou AH, Yang MW, Chang CJ. An analysis of perioperative eye injuries after nonocular surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan 2010; 48 (03) 122-129
  • 13 Carniciu AL, Fazzari MJ, Tabibian P. , et al. Cornea abrasion following anaesthesia for non-ocular surgical procedures: a case-controlled study. J Perioper Pract 2017; 27 (11) 247-253
  • 14 Deljou A, Weingarten TN, Mahr MA, Sprung J, Martin DP. Postoperative corneal injuries: Incidence and risk factors. Anesth Analg 2019; 129 (03) 737-742
  • 15 Roth S, Thisted RA, Erickson JP, Black S, Schreider BD. Eye injuries after nonocular surgery. A study of 60,965 anesthetics from 1988 to 1992. Anesthesiology 1996; 85 (05) 1020-1027
  • 16 Vetter TR, Ali NM, Boudreaux AM. A case-control study of an intraoperative corneal abrasion prevention program: holding the gains made with a continuous quality improvement effort. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2012; 38 (11) 490-496
  • 17 Batra YK, Bali IM. Corneal abrasions during general anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1977; 56 (03) 363-365