Download PDF
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2020; 81(04): 302-309
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3400752
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Clinical Outcomes Based on Preoperative Kambin's Triangular Working Zone Measurements on 3D CT/MR Fusion Imaging to Determine Optimal Approaches to Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Diskectomy

Jiro Hirayama
1   Department of Orthopaedic and Spine Surgery, Seikei-kai Chiba Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
,
Masayuki Hashimoto
1   Department of Orthopaedic and Spine Surgery, Seikei-kai Chiba Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
,
Takuya Sakamoto
1   Department of Orthopaedic and Spine Surgery, Seikei-kai Chiba Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

23 December 2018

23 May 2019

Publication Date:
21 January 2020 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar diskectomy (TELD) is a widely used minimally invasive surgical procedure to treat herniated disks. Postoperative dysesthesia (POD) is a significant complication that affects patient satisfaction. Several anatomical and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging studies of the intervertebral foramina showed that TELD should be avoided in patients with small Kambin's triangular working zones. Recently, some reports indicated the usefulness of three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography/magnetic resonance (CT/MR) fusion images. To date, no articles have been published in the English literature regarding the use of 3D CT/MR fusion images before TELD to evaluate Kambin's triangular working zone. Our objective was to examine clinical outcomes when preoperative Kambin's triangular working zone measurements from 3D CT/MR fusion images were used to determine the approach to TELD.

Patients and Methods We included 31 patients who underwent TELD. We rotated the 3D CT/MR fusion images from the posteroanterior view on the approach side to the angle at which Kambin's triangular working zone appeared the largest. This was used to determine the intraoperative insertion angle for the working cannula. When the perpendicular line extending from the exiting nerve at the intervertebral disk level to the upper margin of the superior articular process (exiting nerve-superior articular process distance [ESD]) was less than or equal to 7 mm, an approach that combined foraminoplasty with an outside-in technique (F + outside-in) was used. We compared ESD and clinical outcomes, such as POD, between the approaches.

Results Surgical plans were based on ESD values from 22 patients. ESD was 7 mm in 21 patients, all of whom underwent F + outside-in. The inside-out approach was used in eight of nine patients who did not have ESD measurements. Of these, five patients had retrospective ESD measurements of 7 mm. The mean ESD was 6.3 ± 1.0 mm when inside-out was used and 4.4 ± 1.6 mm when F + outside-in was used, a significant difference. Significant improvements were observed in the visual analog scale scores for low back pain, lower limb pain, and lower limb paresthesia. There were no incidences of POD or intraoperative complications.

Conclusion Based on preoperative Kambin's triangular working zone measurements from 3D CT/MR fusion images, F + outside-in should be selected when the working zone is smaller than the cannula diameter. This method successfully avoided POD in our study. Preoperative Kambin's triangular working zone measurements from 3D CT/MR fusion imaging can enhance patient safety during TELD.

Keywords

transforaminal endoscopic lumbar diskectomy - postoperative dysesthesia - Kambin's triangular working zone - 3D CT/MR fusion imaging - foraminoplasty
 

  • References

  • 1 Kambin P. Arthroscopic microdiskectomy. Mt Sinai J Med 1991; 58 (02) 159-164
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Nellensteijn J, Ostelo R, Bartels R, Peul W, van Royen B, van Tulder M. Transforaminal endoscopic surgery for symptomatic lumbar disc herniations: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J 2010; 19 (02) 181-204
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Liu X, Yuan S, Tian Y. , et al. Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy, microendoscopic discectomy, and microdiscectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation: minimum 2-year follow-up results. J Neurosurg Spine 2018; 28 (03) 317-325
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Yeung AT, Tsou PM. Posterolateral endoscopic excision for lumbar disc herniation: surgical technique, outcome, and complications in 307 consecutive cases. Spine 2002; 27 (07) 722-731
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Cho JY, Lee SH, Lee HY. Prevention of development of postoperative dysesthesia in transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for intracanalicular lumbar disc herniation: floating retraction technique. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2011; 54 (5–6): 214-218
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Choi I, Ahn JO, So WS, Lee SJ, Choi IJ, Kim H. Exiting root injury in transforaminal endoscopic discectomy: preoperative image considerations for safety. Eur Spine J 2013; 22 (11) 2481-2487
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Mirkovic SR, Schwartz DG, Glazier KD. Anatomic considerations in lumbar posterolateral percutaneous procedures. Spine 1995; 20 (18) 1965-1971
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Min JH, Kang SH, Lee JB, Cho TH, Suh JK, Rhyu IJ. Morphometric analysis of the working zone for endoscopic lumbar discectomy. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005; 18 (02) 132-135
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Civelek E, Solmaz I, Cansever T. , et al. Radiological analysis of the triangular working zone during transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy. Asian Spine J 2012; 6 (02) 98-104
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Guan X, Gu X, Zhang L. , et al. Morphometric analysis of the working zone for posterolateral endoscopic lumbar discectomy based on magnetic resonance neurography. J Spinal Disord Tech 2015; 28 (02) E78-E84
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Yeung AT, Yeung CA. Advances in endoscopic disc and spine surgery: foraminal approach. Surg Technol Int 2003; 11: 255-263
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Schubert M, Hoogland T. Endoscopic transforaminal nucleotomy with foraminoplasty for lumbar disk herniation. Oper Orthop Traumatol 2005; 17 (06) 641-661
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hoogland T, Schubert M, Miklitz B, Ramirez A. Transforaminal posterolateral endoscopic discectomy with or without the combination of a low-dose chymopapain: a prospective randomized study in 280 consecutive cases. Spine 2006; 31 (24) E890-E897
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Choi G, Lee SH, Lokhande P. , et al. Percutaneous endoscopic approach for highly migrated intracanal disc herniations by foraminoplastic technique using rigid working channel endoscope. Spine 2008; 33 (15) E508-E515
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Jasper GP, Francisco GM, Telfeian AE. Endoscopic transforaminal discectomy for an extruded lumbar disc herniation. Pain Physician 2013; 16 (01) E31-E35
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Henmi T, Terai T, Hibino N. , et al. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy utilizing ventral epiduroscopic observation technique and foraminoplasty for transligamentous extruded nucleus pulposus: technical note. J Neurosurg Spine 2016; 24 (02) 275-280
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Choi KC, Shim HK, Park CJ, Lee DC, Park CK. Usefulness of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar foraminoplasty for lumbar disc herniation. World Neurosurg 2017; 106: 484-492
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Li ZZ, Hou SX, Shang WL, Song KR, Zhao HL. Modified percutaneous lumbar foraminoplasty and percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: instrument design, technique notes, and 5 years follow-up. Pain Physician 2017; 20 (01) E85-E98
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Hirayama J, Hashimoto M, Fujita K. , et al. Preoperative planning using 3-D MRI/CT fusion imaging for percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy. J Spine Res 2015; 6: 1300-1304
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Hirayama J, Hashimoto M, Fujita K. , et al. 3-D MRI/CT fusion imaging in the preoperative planning of percutaneous endoscopic discectomy (PED) for lateral lumbar disc herniation. J Spine Res 2016; 7: 1308-1312
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Hirayama J, Hashimoto M. Percutaneous endoscopic diskectomy using an interlaminar approach based on 3D CT/MR fusion imaging. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2019; 80 (02) 88-95
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Gore S, Yeung A. The “inside out” transforaminal technique to treat lumbar spinal pain in an awake and aware patient under local anesthesia: results and a review of the literature. Int J Spine Surg 2014; 8: 8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Ahn Y, Lee SH, Park WM, Lee HY, Shin SW, Kang HY. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for recurrent disc herniation: surgical technique, outcome, and prognostic factors of 43 consecutive cases. Spine 2004; 29 (16) E326-E332
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, Godolias G. Full-endoscopic interlaminar and transforaminal lumbar discectomy versus conventional microsurgical technique: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Spine 2008; 33 (09) 931-939
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Yeung A, Gore S. Endoscopic foraminal decompression for failed back surgery syndrome under local anesthesia. Int J Spine Surg 2014; 8: 8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Fang G, Ding Z, Song Z. Comparison of the effects of epidural anesthesia and local anesthesia in lumbar transforaminal endoscopic surgery. Pain Physician 2016; 19 (07) E1001-E1004
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Hurday Y, Xu B, Guo L. , et al. Radiographic measurement for transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic approach (PELD). Eur Spine J 2017; 26 (03) 635-645
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Xin G, Shi-Sheng H, Hai-Long Z. Morphometric analysis of the YESS and TESSYS techniques of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy. Clin Anat 2013; 26 (06) 728-734
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Barry M, Livesley P. Facet joint hypertrophy: the cross-sectional area of the superior articular process of L4 and L5. Eur Spine J 1997; 6 (02) 121-124
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Lee S, Kim SK, Lee SH. , et al. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for migrated disc herniation: classification of disc migration and surgical approaches. Eur Spine J 2007; 16 (03) 431-437
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Zhong W, Driscoll SJ, Tsai TY. , et al. In vivo dynamic changes of dimensions in the lumbar intervertebral foramen. Spine J 2015; 15 (07) 1653-1659
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Schenck C, van Susante J, van Gorp M, Belder R, Vleggeert-Lankamp C. Lumbar spinal canal dimensions measured intraoperatively after decompression are not properly rendered on early postoperative MRI. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2016; 158 (05) 981-988
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Stamates MM, Frim DM, Yang CW, Katzman GL, Ali S. Magnetic resonance imaging in the prone position and the diagnosis of tethered spinal cord. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2018; 21 (01) 4-10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Fan G, Wang C, Gu X, Zhang H, He S. Trajectory planning and guided punctures with isocentric navigation in posterolateral endoscopic lumbar discectomy. World Neurosurg 2017; 103: 899-905.e4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Liu YB, Wang Y, Chen ZQ. , et al. Volume navigation with fusion of real-time ultrasound and CT images to guide posterolateral transforaminal puncture in percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy. Pain Physician 2018; 21 (03) E265-E278
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Ao S, Wu J, Tang Y. , et al. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy assisted by O-arm-based navigation improves the learning curve. BioMed Res Int 2019; 2019: 6509409
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Yamanaka Y, Kamogawa J, Katagi R. , et al. 3-D MRI/CT fusion imaging of the lumbar spine. Skeletal Radiol 2010; 39 (03) 285-288
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Hato T, Kamogawa J, Kawahara N. 3-D MRI/CT fusion imaging for PLIF. J Spine Res 2014; 5: 1366-1370
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Yamaya S, Kanno H, Nakamura S, Takahashi N, Sato T. A novel preoperative assessment for microendscopic lumbar spine surgery using three-dimensional fusion imaging: visualization of the nerve root, dural sac, intervertebral disc and ligamentum flavum. J Spine Res 2015; 6: 1305-1311
    PubMedGoogle Scholar