Download PDF
J Knee Surg 2021; 34(10): 1098-1109
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1701515
Original Article

Risk Factors for Patellar Clunk or Crepitation after Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Guman Duan 
1   Department of Orthopaedics, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
,
Sijia Cai
2   Department of Endocrinology, Beijing Hepingli Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
,
Weiwei Lin
3   Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China
,
Yongwei Pan
1   Department of Orthopaedics, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Patellar clunk and crepitation (PCC) have been reported as a consequence of primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The incidence and contributing factors have not been fully defined. We performed this systematic review to evaluate factors associated with PCC following primary TKA. We identified studies on PCC following TKA from an electronic search of articles in Medline, Embase and the Cochrane databases (dated up to May 2018). Eighteen studies altogether, including 600 cases of PCC within 8,131 TKAs, were included in the meta-analysis. Several factors including demographic, intraoperative, clinical variables, and radiographic measurements were pooled for meta-analysis. Among intraoperative and clinical variables, patients involved with patellar retention (odds ratio [OR] = 9.420; confidence interval [CI]: 5.770–13.070), lateral reticular release (OR = 2.818; CI: 1.114–7.125), and previous surgery (OR = 2.724; CI: 1.549–4.790) were more likely to having PCCs. Among radiographic measurements, increased anterior tibial offset (weighted mean difference [WMD] = 0.387; CI: 0.139–0.634), increased joint line changes (WMD = 1.325; CI: 0.595–2.055), and increased knee flexion angle (WMD = 3.592; CI: 1.811–5.374) were considered risk factors associated with PCC. Demographic factors (age, gender, body mass index [BMI], and diagnosis) and other reported radiographic measurements were not associated with PCCs. This study identified intraoperative variables (patellar retention and lateral reticular release), clinical variables (previous surgery), and radiographic measurements (increased anterior tibial offset, increased joint line changes, and increased postoperative knee flexion angle) that contribute to an increased risk for PCC. Modifiable factors (patellar retention and lateral reticular release) should be considered and addressed to limit the risk for PCC following TKA. Patients with conditions that may not be modifiable may benefit from counseling about their increased risks for PCC to limit potential dissatisfaction with their procedure.

Keywords

risk factors - patellar crepitus - patellar clunk - total knee arthroplasty - meta-analysis

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 26 March 2019

Accepted: 27 December 2019

Article published online:
04 March 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Insall JN, Lachiewicz PF, Burstein AH. The posterior stabilized condylar prosthesis: a modification of the total condylar design. Two to four-year clinical experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982; 64 (09) 1317-1323
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Booth Jr RE, Balderston RA. The patellar clunk syndrome. A complication of posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989; (241) 203-208
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Messieh M. Management of patellar clunk under local anesthesia. J Arthroplasty 1996; 11 (02) 202-203
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Lucas TS, DeLuca PF, Nazarian DG, Bartolozzi AR, Booth Jr RE. Arthroscopic treatment of patellar clunk. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999; (367) 226-229
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Ip D, Wu WC, Tsang WL. Comparison of two total knee prostheses on the incidence of patella clunk syndrome. Int Orthop 2002; 26 (01) 48-51
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Takahashi M, Miyamoto S, Nagano A. Arthroscopic treatment of soft-tissue impingement under the patella after total knee arthroplasty. Arthroscopy 2002; 18 (04) E20
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Wong JW, Yau PW, Chiu PK. Arthroscopic treatment of patellar symptoms in posterior stabilized total knee replacement. Int Orthop 2002; 26 (04) 250-252
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Koh YG, Kim SJ, Chun YM, Kim YC, Park YS. Arthroscopic treatment of patellofemoral soft tissue impingement after posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Knee 2008; 15 (01) 36-39
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Dajani KA, Stuart MJ, Dahm DL, Levy BA. Arthroscopic treatment of patellar clunk and synovial hyperplasia after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2010; 25 (01) 97-103
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Dennis DA, Kim RH, Johnson DR, Springer BD, Fehring TK, Sharma A. The John Insall Award: control-matched evaluation of painful patellar Crepitus after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469 (01) 10-17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Schroer WC, Diesfeld PJ, Reedy ME, LeMarr A. Association of increased knee flexion and patella clunk syndrome after mini-subvastus total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24 (02) 281-287
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Abdel MP, Ledford CK, Kobic A. et al. Contemporary failure aetiologies of the primary, posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2017; 99-B (05) 647-652
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Zmistowski B, Restrepo C, Kahl LK, Parvizi J, Sharkey PF. Incidence and reasons for nonrevision reoperation after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469 (01) 138-145
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Gopinathan P. Patello-femoral clunk syndrome-current concepts. J Orthop 2014; 11 (02) 55-57
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Toomey SD, Daccach JA, Shah JC, Himden SE, Lesko JP, Hamilton WG. Comparative incidence of patellofemoral complications between 2 total knee arthroplasty systems in a multicenter, prospective clinical study. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (9S): S187-S192
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Geannette C, Miller T, Saboeiro G, Parks M. Sonographic evaluation of patellar clunk syndrome following total knee arthroplasty. J Clin Ultrasound 2017; 45 (02) 105-107
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Heyse TJ, Chongle R, Davis J. et al. MRI diagnosis of patellar clunk syndrome following total knee arthroplasty. HSS J 2012; 8 (02) 92-95
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Okamoto T, Futani H, Atsui K, Fukunishi S, Koezuka A, Maruo S. Sonographic appearance of fibrous nodules in patellar clunk syndrome: a case report. J Orthop Sci 2002; 7 (05) 590-593
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Beight JL, Yao B, Hozack WJ, Hearn SL, Booth Jr RE. The patellar “clunk” syndrome after posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994; (299) 139-142
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Pollock DC, Ammeen DJ, Engh GA. Synovial entrapment: a complication of posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84 (12) 2174-2178
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Ip D, Ko PS, Lee OB, Wu WC, Lam JJ. Natural history and pathogenesis of the patella clunk syndrome. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2004; 124 (09) 597-602
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Ogawa H, Matsumoto K, Akiyama H. Effect of patellar resurfacing on patellofemoral crepitus in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31 (08) 1792-1796
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Maloney WJ, Schmidt R, Sculco TP. Femoral component design and patellar clunk syndrome. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; (410) 199-202
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Clarke HD, Fuchs R, Scuderi GR, Mills EL, Scott WN, Insall JN. The influence of femoral component design in the elimination of patellar clunk in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2006; 21 (02) 167-171
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Lonner JH, Jasko JG, Bezwada HP, Nazarian DG, Booth Jr RE. Incidence of patellar clunk with a modern posterior-stabilized knee design. Am J Orthop 2007; 36 (10) 550-553
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Frye BM, Floyd MW, Pham DC, Feldman JJ, Hamlin BR. Effect of femoral component design on patellofemoral crepitance and patella clunk syndrome after posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27 (06) 1166-1170
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Aglietti P, Baldini A, Buzzi R, Indelli PF. Patella resurfacing in total knee replacement: functional evaluation and complications. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2001; 9 (Suppl. 01) S27-S33
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Anderson MJ, Becker DL, Kieckbusch T. Patellofemoral complications after posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of 2 different implant designs. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17 (04) 422-426
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Choi WC, Ryu KJ, Lee S, Seong SC, Lee MC. Painful patellar clunk or crepitation of contemporary knee prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471 (05) 1512-1522
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Fukunaga K, Kobayashi A, Minoda Y, Iwaki H, Hashimoto Y, Takaoka K. The incidence of the patellar clunk syndrome in a recently designed mobile-bearing posteriorly stabilised total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009; 91 (04) 463-468
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Hamilton WG, Sritulanondha S, Engh Jr CA. Prospective randomized comparison of high-flex and standard rotating platform total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26 (6, Suppl): 28-34
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Larson CM, Lachiewicz PF. Patellofemoral complications with the Insall-Burstein II posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1999; 14 (03) 288-292
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Shoji H, Shimozaki E. Patellar clunk syndrome in total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing. J Arthroplasty 1996; 11 (02) 198-201
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Niikura T, Tsumura N, Tsujimoto K, Yoshiya S, Kurosaka M, Shiba R. Patellar clunk syndrome after TKA with cruciate retaining design: a report of two cases. Orthopedics 2008; 31 (01) 90
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Figgie III HE, Goldberg VM, Heiple KG, Moller III HS, Gordon NH. The influence of tibial-patellofemoral location on function of the knee in patients with the posterior stabilized condylar knee prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986; 68 (07) 1035-1040
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Fuchs R, Mills EL, Clarke HD, Scuderi GR, Scott WN, Insall JN. A third-generation, posterior-stabilized knee prosthesis: early results after follow-up of 2 to 6 years. J Arthroplasty 2006; 21 (06) 821-825
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Ranawat CS, White PB, West S, Ranawat AS. Clinical and radiographic results of attune and PFC Sigma knee designs at 2-year follow-up: a prospective matched-pair analysis. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (02) 431-436
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Yau WP, Wong JWK, Chiu KY, Ng TP, Tang WM. Patellar clunk syndrome after posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18 (08) 1023-1028
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Hwang BH, Nam CH, Jung KA, Ong A, Lee SC. Is further treatment necessary for patellar crepitus after total knee arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471 (02) 606-612
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Peralta-Molero JV, Gladnick BP, Lee YY, Ferrer AV, Lyman S, González Della Valle A. Patellofemoral crepitation and clunk following modern, fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (03) 535-540
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Conrad DN, Dennis DA. Patellofemoral crepitus after total knee arthroplasty: etiology and preventive measures. Clin Orthop Surg 2014; 6 (01) 9-19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Gladnick BP, Gonzalez Della Valle A. Patellofemoral crepitation and clunk complicating posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Am J Orthop 2014; 43 (10) 458-464
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Robertson CJ. Joint crepitus–are we failing our patients?. Physioth Res Int 2010; 15 (04) 185-188
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Song SJ, Park CH, Liang H, Kim SJ. Noise around the knee. Clin Orthop Surg 2018; 10 (01) 1-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. ; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. Open Med 2009; 3 (03) e123-e130
    Google Scholar
  • 46 Wells GA, Shea BJ, O'Connell D. et al. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Non-Randomized Studies in Meta-Analysis. Accessed January 10, 2020 at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c293/fb316b6176154c3fdbb8340a107d9c8c82bf.pdf?_ga=2.9953717.1268950609.1578652428-1889254951.1561091521
    Google Scholar
  • 47 Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Accessed January 10, 2020 at: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/archive/v5.1/
    Google Scholar
  • 48 Duan G, Liu C, Lin W. et al. Different factors conduct anterior knee pain following primary total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33 (06) 1962-1971.e3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 2005; 5: 13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Lau J, Ioannidis JP, Schmid CH. Quantitative synthesis in systematic reviews. [J] Ann Intern Med 1997; 127 (09) 820-826
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Wei J, Yang TB, Luo W, Qin JB, Kong FJ. Complications following dorsal versus volar plate fixation of distal radius fracture: a meta-analysis. J Int Med Res 2013; 41 (02) 265-275
    Google Scholar
  • 52 Costanzo JA, Aynardi MC, Peters JD, Kopolovich DM, Purtill JJ. Patellar clunk syndrome after total knee arthroplasty; risk factors and functional outcomes of arthroscopic treatment. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (9, Suppl): 201-204
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Agarwala SR, Mohrir GS, Patel AG. Patellar clunk syndrome in a current high flexion total knee design. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28 (10) 1846-1850
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Bae DK, Baek JH, Yoon KT, Son HS, Song SJ. Comparison of patellofemoral outcomes after TKA using two prostheses with different patellofemoral design features. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25 (12) 3747-3754
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Snir N, Schwarzkopf R, Diskin B, Takemoto R, Hamula M, Meere PA. Incidence of patellar clunk syndrome in fixed versus high-flex mobile bearing posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (10) 2021-2024
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Khan A, Pradhan N. Results of total knee replacement with/without resurfacing of the patella. Acta Ortop Bras 2012; 20 (05) 300-302
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Hsu HC, Luo ZP, Rand JA, An KN. Influence of lateral release on patellar tracking and patellofemoral contact characteristics after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1997; 12 (01) 74-83
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Cho WS, Woo JH, Park HY, Youm YS, Kim BK. Should the ‘no thumb technique’ be the golden standard for evaluating patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty?. Knee 2011; 18 (03) 177-179
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Kim JH, Lee S, Ko DO, Yoo CW, Chun TH, Lee JS. The analysis of risk factors in no thumb test in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg 2011; 3 (04) 274-278
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Shillington MP, Cashman K, Farmer G. Patellofemoral crepitus in high flexion rotating platform knee arthroplasty. ANZ J Surg 2013; 83 (10) 779-783
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Chen K, Li G, Fu D, Yuan C, Zhang Q, Cai Z. Patellar resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Int Orthop 2013; 37 (06) 1075-1083
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Pilling RW, Moulder E, Allgar V, Messner J, Sun Z, Mohsen A. Patellar resurfacing in primary total knee replacement: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94 (24) 2270-2278
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS, Slamin JE, Dennis DA. Patellar crepitation in the P.F.C. sigma total knee system. Orthopedics 2006; 29 (9, Suppl): S68-S70
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Park KK, Chang CB, Kang YG, Seong SC, Kim TK. Correlation of maximum flexion with clinical outcome after total knee replacement in Asian patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89 (05) 604-608
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Sumino T, Gadikota HR, Varadarajan KM, Kwon YM, Rubash HE, Li G. Do high flexion posterior stabilised total knee arthroplasty designs increase knee flexion? A meta analysis. Int Orthop 2011; 35 (09) 1309-1319
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 McNabb DC, Dennis DA, Jennings JM, Daines B, Laz P, Kim RH. Implant design and effects on patellofemoral crepitus. J Knee Surg 2017; 30 (09) 863-871
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Martin JR, Jennings JM, Watters TS, Levy DL, McNabb DC, Dennis DA. Femoral implant design modification decreases the incidence of patellar crepitus in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (04) 1310-1313
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Tang YH, Wong WK, Wong HL. Patellar clunk syndrome in fixed-bearing posterior-stabilised versus cruciate-substituting prostheses. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2014; 22 (01) 80-83
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Nam SW, Lee YS, Kwak JH, Kim NK, Lee BK. A comparison of the clinical and radiographic results of press fit condylar rotating-platform high-flexion and low contact stress mobile bearing prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty: short term results. Knee Surg Relat Res 2012; 24 (01) 7-13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Breugem SJM, van Ooij B, Haverkamp D, Sierevelt IN, van Dijk CN. No difference in anterior knee pain between a fixed and a mobile posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty after 7.9 years. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014; 22 (03) 509-516
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Mugnai R, Digennaro V, Ensini A, Leardini A, Catani F. Can TKA design affect the clinical outcome? Comparison between two guided-motion systems. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014; 22 (03) 581-589
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Sawaguchi N, Majima T, Ishigaki T, Mori N, Terashima T, Minami A. Mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty improves patellar tracking and patellofemoral contact stress: in vivo measurements in the same patients. J Arthroplasty 2010; 25 (06) 920-925
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Meftah M, Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS. Ten-year follow-up of a rotating-platform, posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94 (05) 426-432
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Park CN, White PB, Meftah M, Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS. Diagnostic algorithm for residual pain after total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2016; 39 (02) e246-e252
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Burns PB, Rohrich RJ, Chung KC. The levels of evidence and their role in evidence-based medicine. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 (01) 305-310
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar