J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2021; 82(S 03): e335-e341
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1701677
Original Article

Computed Tomography as a Predictor of Sinonasal Inverted Papilloma Origin, Skull Base Involvement, and Stage

Jake J. Lee
1   Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
,
Hilary L. P. Orlowski
2   Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
,
John S. Schneider
1   Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
,
Lauren T. Roland
1   Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
3   Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
5   Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, San Francisco School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Rami Eldaya
2   Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
,
Pawina Jiramongkolchai
1   Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
,
Dorina Kallogjeri
1   Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
,
Rebecca D. Chernock
4   Department of Pathology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
,
Cristine N. Klatt-Cromwell
1   Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
› Author Affiliations
Funding Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under Award Number 5T32DC000022-30 and by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the NIH under award number UL1TR002345. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

Abstract

Objective To investigate the diagnostic performance of computed tomography (CT) to determine the origin, skull base involvement, and stage of sinonasal inverted papilloma (IP).

Design This is a retrospective cohort study.

Setting This is set at a tertiary care medical center.

Participants Patients with preoperative CT imaging who underwent extirpative surgery for histologically confirmed sinonasal IP between January 2005 and October 2019.

Main Outcome Measures The likely sites of tumor origin, skull base involvement, and radiographic tumor stage were determined by two board-certified neuroradiologists after re-reviewing preoperative CT imaging. These radiologic findings were then compared with intraoperative and pathologic findings.

Results Of 86 patients, 74% (64/86) had IP lesions with correctly classified sites of origin on CT. CT was not sensitive for diagnosing ethmoid sinus origin (48%, 52%), frontal sinus origin (80%, 40%), and skull base origin (17%, 17%). CT was not sensitive (62%, 57%) but specific (86%, 98%) for identifying any skull base involvement. There was substantial-to-near perfect agreement between radiographic and pathologic Cannady stages (weighted κ = 0.61 for rater 1; weighted κ = 0.81 for rater 2). Interrater agreement was substantial for identifying tumor origin (κ = 0.75) and stage (weighted κ = 0.62) and moderate for identifying skull base involvement (κ = 0.43).

Conclusion Interrater agreement on CT findings was substantial except on skull base involvement. CT correctly predicted site of tumor origin in up to 74% of subjects. CT was not sensitive for diagnosing skull base involvement but had substantial-to-near perfect agreement with pathologic tumor staging. CT is a useful but albeit limited adjunct for tumor localization and surgical planning for sinonasal IP.

Note

Poster presented at the North American Skull Base Society 2019 Annual Meeting, Orlando, Florida, United States, February 16, 2019.




Publication History

Received: 10 May 2019

Accepted: 31 December 2019

Article published online:
20 February 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Chiu AG, Jackman AH, Antunes MB, Feldman MD, Palmer JN. Radiographic and histologic analysis of the bone underlying inverted papillomas. Laryngoscope 2006; 116 (09) 1617-1620
  • 2 Hyams VJ. Papillomas of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. A clinicopathological study of 315 cases. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1971; 80 (02) 192-206
  • 3 Mirza S, Bradley PJ, Acharya A, Stacey M, Jones NS. Sinonasal inverted papillomas: recurrence, and synchronous and metachronous malignancy. J Laryngol Otol 2007; 121 (09) 857-864
  • 4 Ringertz N. Pathology of malignant tumors arising in the nasal and paranasal cavities and maxilla. Acta Otolaryngol 1938; 27: 31-42
  • 5 Lawson W, Patel ZM. The evolution of management for inverted papilloma: an analysis of 200 cases. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009; 140 (03) 330-335
  • 6 Nygren A, Kiss K, von Buchwald C, Bilde A. Rate of recurrence and malignant transformation in 88 cases with inverted papilloma between 1998-2008. Acta Otolaryngol 2016; 136 (03) 333-336
  • 7 Vrabec DP. The inverted Schneiderian papilloma: a 25-year study. Laryngoscope 1994; 104 (5 Pt 1): 582-605
  • 8 Cannady SB, Batra PS, Sautter NB, Roh HJ, Citardi MJ. New staging system for sinonasal inverted papilloma in the endoscopic era. Laryngoscope 2007; 117 (07) 1283-1287
  • 9 Grayson JW, Khichi SS, Cho D-Y, Riley KO, Woodworth BA. Management strategies for skull base inverted papilloma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016; 155 (01) 179-183
  • 10 Krouse JH. Development of a staging system for inverted papilloma. Laryngoscope 2000; 110 (06) 965-968
  • 11 Bugter O, Monserez DA, van Zijl FVWJ, Baatenburg de Jong RJ, Hardillo JA. Surgical management of inverted papilloma; a single-center analysis of 247 patients with long follow-up. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 46 (01) 67
  • 12 Christensen WN, Smith RR. Schneiderian papillomas: a clinicopathologic study of 67 cases. Hum Pathol 1986; 17 (04) 393-400
  • 13 Bielamowicz S, Calcaterra TC, Watson D. Inverting papilloma of the head and neck: the UCLA update. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993; 109 (01) 71-76
  • 14 Busquets JM, Hwang PH. Endoscopic resection of sinonasal inverted papilloma: a meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006; 134 (03) 476-482
  • 15 Kim JS, Kwon SH. Recurrence of sinonasal inverted papilloma following surgical approach: a meta-analysis. Laryngoscope 2017; 127 (01) 52-58
  • 16 Bhalla RK, Wright ED. Predicting the site of attachment of sinonasal inverted papilloma. Rhinology 2009; 47 (04) 345-348
  • 17 Fang G, Lou H, Yu W. et al. Prediction of the originating site of sinonasal inverted papilloma by preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2016; 6 (12) 1221-1228
  • 18 Lee DK, Chung SK, Dhong HJ, Kim HY, Kim HJ, Bok KH. Focal hyperostosis on CT of sinonasal inverted papilloma as a predictor of tumor origin. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007; 28 (04) 618-621
  • 19 Lund VJ, Lloyd GA. Radiological changes associated with inverted papilloma of the nose and paranasal sinuses. Br J Radiol 1984; 57 (678) 455-461
  • 20 Sham CL, King AD, van Hasselt A, Tong MC. The roles and limitations of computed tomography in the preoperative assessment of sinonasal inverted papillomas. Am J Rhinol 2008; 22 (02) 144-150
  • 21 Yousuf K, Wright ED. Site of attachment of inverted papilloma predicted by CT findings of osteitis. Am J Rhinol 2007; 21 (01) 32-36
  • 22 Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33 (01) 159-174
  • 23 Jeon TY, Kim HJ, Chung SK. et al. Sinonasal inverted papilloma: value of convoluted cerebriform pattern on MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29 (08) 1556-1560