Download PDF
J Knee Surg 2021; 34(11): 1162-1169
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1702185
Original Article

Factors Influencing Graft Function following MPFL Reconstruction: A Dynamic Simulation Study

Miho J. Tanaka
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Andrew J. Cosgarea
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Jared M. Forman
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
,
John J. Elias 
3   Department of Research, Cleveland Clinic Akron General, Akron, Ohio
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is currently the primary surgical procedure for treating recurrent lateral patellar instability. The understanding of graft function has largely been based on studies performed with normal knees. The current study was performed to characterize graft function following MPFL reconstruction, focusing on the influence of pathologic anatomy on graft tension, variations with knee flexion, and the influence on patellar tracking. Knee squatting was simulated with 15 multibody dynamic simulation models representing knees being treated for recurrent lateral patellar instability. Squatting was simulated in a preoperative condition and following MPFL reconstruction with a hamstrings tendon graft set to allow 0.5 quadrants of lateral patellar translation with the knee at 30 degrees of flexion. Linear regressions were performed to relate maximum tension in the graft to parameters of knee anatomy. Repeated measures comparisons evaluated variations in patellar tracking at 5-degree increments of knee flexion. Maximum graft tension was significantly correlated with a parameter characterizing lateral position of the tibial tuberosity (maximum lateral tibial tuberosity to posterior cruciate ligament attachment distance, r 2 = 0.73, p < 0.001). No significant correlations were identified for parameters related to trochlear dysplasia (lateral trochlear inclination) or patella alta (Caton–Deschamps index and patellotrochlear index). Graft tension peaked at low flexion angles and was minimal by 30 degrees of flexion. MPFL reconstruction decreased lateral patellar shift (bisect offset index) compared with preoperative tracking at all flexion angles from 0 to 50 degrees of flexion, except 45 degrees. At 0 degrees, the average bisect offset index decreased from 0.81 for the preoperative condition to 0.71. The results indicate that tension within an MPFL graft increases with the lateral position of the tibial tuberosity. The graft tension peaks at low flexion angles and decreases lateral patellar maltracking. The factors that influence graft function following MPFL reconstruction need to be understood to limit patellar maltracking without overloading the graft or over constraining the patella.

Keywords

patellar instability - MPFL reconstruction - patellar tracking - computational simulation


Publication History

Received: 03 September 2019

Accepted: 07 January 2020

Article published online:
06 March 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Liu JN, Steinhaus ME, Kalbian IL. et al. Patellar instability management: a survey of the international patellofemoral study group. Am J Sports Med 2018; 46 (13) 3299-3306
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Schneider DK, Grawe B, Magnussen RA. et al. Outcomes after isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for the treatment of recurrent lateral patellar dislocations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 2016; 44 (11) 2993-3005
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Shah JN, Howard JS, Flanigan DC, Brophy RH, Carey JL, Lattermann C. A systematic review of complications and failures associated with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for recurrent patellar dislocation. Am J Sports Med 2012; 40 (08) 1916-1923
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Hopper GP, Leach WJ, Rooney BP, Walker CR, Blyth MJ. Does degree of trochlear dysplasia and position of femoral tunnel influence outcome after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction?. Am J Sports Med 2014; 42 (03) 716-722
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Lind M, Enderlein D, Nielsen T, Christiansen SE, Faunø P. Clinical outcome after reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament in paediatric subjects with recurrent patella instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24 (03) 666-671
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Lippacher S, Dreyhaupt J, Williams SR, Reichel H, Nelitz M. Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament: clinical outcomes and return to sports. Am J Sports Med 2014; 42 (07) 1661-1668
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Ronga M, Oliva F, Longo UG, Testa V, Capasso G, Maffulli N. Isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for recurrent patellar dislocation. Am J Sports Med 2009; 37 (09) 1735-1742
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Schiphouwer L, Rood A, Tigchelaar S, Koëter S. Complications of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction using two transverse patellar tunnels. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25 (01) 245-250
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Hiemstra LA, Kerslake S, Loewen M, Lafave M. Effect of trochlear dysplasia on outcomes after isolated soft tissue stabilization for patellar instability. Am J Sports Med 2016; 44 (06) 1515-1523
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Kita K, Tanaka Y, Toritsuka Y. et al. Factors affecting the outcomes of double-bundle medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for recurrent patellar dislocations evaluated by multivariate analysis. Am J Sports Med 2015; 43 (12) 2988-2996
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Nelitz M, Williams RS, Lippacher S, Reichel H, Dornacher D. Analysis of failure and clinical outcome after unsuccessful medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction in young subjects. Int Orthop 2014; 38 (11) 2265-2272
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Valkering KP, Rajeev A, Caplan N, Tuinebreijer WE, Kader DF. An evaluation of the effectiveness of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction using an anatomical tunnel site. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25 (10) 3206-3212
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Wagner D, Pfalzer F, Hingelbaum S, Huth J, Mauch F, Bauer G. The influence of risk factors on clinical outcomes following anatomical medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction using the gracilis tendon. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013; 21 (02) 318-324
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Camp CL, Krych AJ, Dahm DL, Levy BA, Stuart MJ. Medial patellofemoral ligament repair for recurrent patellar dislocation. Am J Sports Med 2010; 38 (11) 2248-2254
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Sampatacos NE, Getelman MH. Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction using a modified “reverse-loop” technique. Arthrosc Tech 2013; 2 (02) e175-e181
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Beck P, Brown NA, Greis PE, Burks RT. Patellofemoral contact pressures and lateral patellar translation after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2007; 35 (09) 1557-1563
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Elias JJ, Jones KC, Lalonde MK, Gabra JN, Rezvanifar SC, Cosgarea AJ. Allowing one quadrant of patellar lateral translation during medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction successfully limits maltracking without overconstraining the patella. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018; 26 (10) 2883-2890
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Elias JJ, Kelly MJ, Smith KE, Gall KA, Farr J. Dynamic simulation of the effects of graft fixation errors during medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med 2016; 4 (09) 2325967116665080
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Philippot R, Boyer B, Testa R, Farizon F, Moyen B. Study of patellar kinematics after reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2012; 27 (01) 22-26
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Stephen JM, Kittl C, Williams A. et al. Effect of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction method on patellofemoral contact pressures and kinematics. Am J Sports Med 2016; 44 (05) 1186-1194
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Elias JJ, Jones KC, Cyrus Rezvanifar S, Gabra JN, Morscher MA, Cosgarea AJ. Dynamic tracking influenced by anatomy following medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: computational simulation. Knee 2018; 25 (02) 262-270
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Stephen JM, Dodds AL, Lumpaopong P, Kader D, Williams A, Amis AA. The ability of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction to correct patellar kinematics and contact mechanics in the presence of a lateralized tibial tubercle. Am J Sports Med 2015; 43 (09) 2198-2207
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Burrus MT, Werner BC, Cancienne JM, Gwathmey FW, Diduch DR. MPFL graft fixation in low degrees of knee flexion minimizes errors made in the femoral location. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25 (10) 3092-3098
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Smirk C, Morris H. The anatomy and reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament. Knee 2003; 10 (03) 221-227
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Stephen JM, Lumpaopong P, Deehan DJ, Kader D, Amis AA. The medial patellofemoral ligament: location of femoral attachment and length change patterns resulting from anatomic and nonanatomic attachments. Am J Sports Med 2012; 40 (08) 1871-1879
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Redler LH, Meyers KN, Brady JM, Dennis ER, Nguyen JT, Shubin Stein BE. Anisometry of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction in the setting of increased tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance and patella alta. Arthroscopy 2018; 34 (02) 502-510
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Gobbi RG, Pereira CA, Sadigursky D. et al. Evaluation of the isometry of different points of the patella and femur for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2016; 38: 8-12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 McCulloch PC, Bott A, Ramkumar PN. et al. Strain within the native and reconstructed MPFL during knee flexion. J Knee Surg 2014; 27 (02) 125-131
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Oka S, Matsushita T, Kubo S. et al. Simulation of the optimal femoral insertion site in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014; 22 (10) 2364-2371
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Kernkamp WA, Wang C, Li C. et al. The medial patellofemoral ligament is a dynamic and anisometric structure: an in vivo study on length changes and isometry. Am J Sports Med 2019; 47 (07) 1645-1653
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Song SY, Pang CH, Kim CH, Kim J, Choi ML, Seo YJ. Length change behavior of virtual medial patellofemoral ligament fibers during in vivo knee flexion. Am J Sports Med 2015; 43 (05) 1165-1171
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Elias JJ, Carrino JA, Saranathan A, Guseila LM, Tanaka MJ, Cosgarea AJ. Variations in kinematics and function following patellar stabilization including tibial tuberosity realignment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014; 22 (10) 2350-2356
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Elias JJ, Soehnlen NT, Guseila LM, Cosgarea AJ. Dynamic tracking influenced by anatomy in patellar instability. Knee 2016; 23 (03) 450-455
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Biyani R, Elias JJ, Saranathan A. et al. Anatomical factors influencing patellar tracking in the unstable patellofemoral joint. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014; 22 (10) 2334-2341
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Besl PJ, McKay HD. A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 1992; 14: 239-256
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Grood ES, Suntay WJ. A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. J Biomech Eng 1983; 105 (02) 136-144
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Elias JJ, Jones KC, Copa AJ, Cosgarea AJ. Computational simulation of medial versus anteromedial tibial tuberosity transfer for patellar instability. J Orthop Res 2018; 36 (12) 3231-3238
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Elias JJ, Kilambi S, Goerke DR, Cosgarea AJ. Improving vastus medialis obliquus function reduces pressure applied to lateral patellofemoral cartilage. J Orthop Res 2009; 27 (05) 578-583
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Schöttle PB, Schmeling A, Rosenstiel N, Weiler A. Radiographic landmarks for femoral tunnel placement in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2007; 35 (05) 801-804
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Saper MG, Meijer K, Winnier S, Popovich Jr. J, Andrews JR, Roth C. Biomechanical evaluation of classic solid and all-soft suture anchors for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2017; 45 (07) 1622-1626
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Biedert RM, Albrecht S. The patellotrochlear index: a new index for assessing patellar height. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2006; 14 (08) 707-712
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Tanaka MJ, Elias JJ, Williams AA, Demehri S, Cosgarea AJ. Characterization of patellar maltracking using dynamic kinematic CT imaging in subjects with patellar instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24 (11) 3634-3641
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Charles MD, Haloman S, Chen L, Ward SR, Fithian D, Afra R. Magnetic resonance imaging-based topographical differences between control and recurrent patellofemoral instability subjects. Am J Sports Med 2013; 41 (02) 374-384
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Van Haver A, Mahieu P, Claessens T. et al. A statistical shape model of trochlear dysplasia of the knee. Knee 2014; 21 (02) 518-523
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Balcarek P, Oberthür S, Hopfensitz S. et al. Which patellae are likely to redislocate?. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014; 22 (10) 2308-2314
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Joyner PW, Bruce J, Roth TS. et al. Biomechanical tensile strength analysis for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Knee 2017; 24 (05) 965-976
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Smith TO, Donell ST, Chester R, Clark A, Stephenson R. What activities do subjects with patellar instability perceive makes their patella unstable?. Knee 2011; 18 (05) 333-339
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Boutris N, Delgado DA, Labis JS, McCulloch PC, Lintner DM, Harris JD. Current evidence advocates use of a new pathologic tibial tubercle-posterior cruciate ligament distance threshold in subjects with patellar instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018; 26 (09) 2733-2742
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Magnussen RA, De Simone V, Lustig S, Neyret P, Flanigan DC. Treatment of patella alta in subjects with episodic patellar dislocation: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014; 22 (10) 2545-2550
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Batailler C, Neyret P. Trochlear dysplasia: imaging and treatment options. EFORT Open Rev 2018; 3 (05) 240-247
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar