Appl Clin Inform 2020; 11(01): 182-189
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1702215
Research Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

The Impact of Changes to an Electronic Admission Order Set on Prescribing and Clinical Outcomes in the Intensive Care Unit

Ellen T. Muniga
1   Department of Pharmacy, Bronson Methodist Hospital, Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States
,
Todd A. Walroth
2   Department of Pharmacy, Eskenazi Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
,
Natalie C. Washburn
1   Department of Pharmacy, Bronson Methodist Hospital, Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

06 August 2019

13 January 2020

Publication Date:
11 March 2020 (online)

Abstract

Background Implementation of disease-specific order sets has improved compliance with standards of care for a variety of diseases. Evidence of the impact admission order sets can have on care is limited.

Objective The main purpose of this article is to evaluate the impact of changes made to an electronic critical care admission order set on provider prescribing patterns and clinical outcomes.

Methods A retrospective, observational before-and-after exploratory study was performed on adult patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit using the Inpatient Critical Care Admission Order Set. The primary outcome measure was the percentage change in the number of orders for scheduled acetaminophen, a histamine-2 receptor antagonist (H2RA), and lactated ringers at admission before implementation of the revised order set compared with after implementation. Secondary outcomes assessed clinical impact of changes made to the order set.

Results The addition of a different dosing strategy for a medication already available on the order set (scheduled acetaminophen vs. as needed acetaminophen) had no impact on physician prescribing (0 vs. 0%, p = 1.000). The addition of a new medication class (an H2RA) to the order set significantly increased the number of patients prescribed an H2RA for stress ulcer prophylaxis (0 vs. 20%, p < 0.001). Rearranging the list of maintenance intravenous fluids to make lactated ringers the first fluid option in place of normal saline significantly decreased the number of orders for lactated ringers (17 vs. 4%, p = 0.005). The order set changes had no significant impact on clinical outcomes such as incidence of transaminitis, gastrointestinal bleed, and acute kidney injury.

Conclusion Making changes to an admission order set can impact provider prescribing patterns. The type of change made to the order set, in addition to the specific medication changed, may have an effect on how influential the changes are on prescribing patterns.

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

This study was conducted in compliance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki on Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects and was approved by the Institutional Review Board for Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine.


 
  • References

  • 1 Cowden D, Barbacioru C, Kahwash E, Saltz J. Order sets utilization in a clinical order entry system. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2003; 2003: 819
  • 2 ISMP's Guidelines for Standard Order Sets. Institute for Safe Medication Practices. https://www.ismp.org/guidelines/standard-order-sets . Published March 11, 2010. Accessed August 15, 2018
  • 3 Chisolm DJ, McAlearney AS, Veneris S, Fisher D, Holtzlander M, McCoy KS. The role of computerized order sets in pediatric inpatient asthma treatment. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2006; 17 (03) 199-206
  • 4 Ozdas A, Speroff T, Waitman LR, Ozbolt J, Butler J, Miller RA. Integrating “best of care” protocols into clinicians' workflow via care provider order entry: impact on quality-of-care indicators for acute myocardial infarction. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006; 13 (02) 188-196
  • 5 Micek ST, Roubinian N, Heuring T. , et al. Before-after study of a standardized hospital order set for the management of septic shock. Crit Care Med 2006; 34 (11) 2707-2713
  • 6 Fargo EL, D'Amico F, Pickering A, Fowler K, Campbell R, Baumgartner M. Impact of electronic physician order-set on antibiotic ordering time in septic patients in the emergency department. Appl Clin Inform 2018; 9 (04) 869-874
  • 7 Krive J, Shoolin JS, Zink SD. Effectiveness of evidence-based pneumonia CPOE order sets measured by health outcomes. Online J Public Health Inform 2015; 7 (02) e211
  • 8 Brown KE, Johnson KJ, DeRonne BM, Parenti CM, Rice KL. Order set to improve the care of patients hospitalized for an exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2016; 13 (06) 811-815
  • 9 Wright A, Feblowitz JC, Pang JE. , et al. Use of order sets in inpatient computerized provider order entry systems: a comparative analysis of usage patterns at seven sites. Int J Med Inform 2012; 81 (11) 733-745
  • 10 O'Connor C, Adhikari NKJ, DeCaire K, Friedrich JO. Medical admission order sets to improve deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis rates and other outcomes. J Hosp Med 2009; 4 (02) 81-89
  • 11 Bourdeaux CP, Davies KJ, Thomas MJC, Bewley JS, Gould TH. Using ‘nudge’ principles for order set design: a before and after evaluation of an electronic prescribing template in critical care. BMJ Qual Saf 2014; 23 (05) 382-388
  • 12 HHS Acting Secretary Declares Public Health Emergency to Address National Opioid Crisis. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/2017/10/26/hhs-acting-secretary-declares-public-health-emergency-address-national-opioid-crisis.html . Published May 23, 2018. Accessed August 15, 2018
  • 13 Devlin JW, Skrobik Y, Gélinas C. , et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of pain, agitation/sedation, delirium, immobility, and sleep disruption in adult patients in the ICU. Crit Care Med 2018; 46 (09) e825-e873
  • 14 Dowell D, Haegerich TM, Chou R. CDC guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain—United States, 2016. JAMA 2016; 315 (15) 1624-1645
  • 15 Chou R, Gordon DB, de Leon-Casasola OA. , et al. Management of postoperative pain: a clinical practice guideline from the American Pain Society, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists' Committee on Regional Anesthesia, Executive Committee, and Administrative Council. J Pain 2016; 17 (02) 131-157
  • 16 Lin PC, Chang CH, Hsu PI, Tseng PL, Huang YB. The efficacy and safety of proton pump inhibitors vs histamine-2 receptor antagonists for stress ulcer bleeding prophylaxis among critical care patients: a meta-analysis. Crit Care Med 2010; 38 (04) 1197-1205
  • 17 MacLaren R, Reynolds PM, Allen RR. Histamine-2 receptor antagonists vs proton pump inhibitors on gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage and infectious complications in the intensive care unit. JAMA Intern Med 2014; 174 (04) 564-574
  • 18 Azab M, Doo L, Doo DH. , et al. Comparison of the hospital-acquired Clostridium difficile infection risk of using proton pump inhibitors versus histamine-2 receptor antagonists for prophylaxis and treatment of stress ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut Liver 2017; 11 (06) 781-788
  • 19 Bashar FR, Manuchehrian N, Mahmoudabadi M, Hajiesmaeili MR, Torabian S. Effects of ranitidine and pantoprazole on ventilator-associated pneumonia: a randomized double-blind clinical trial. Tanaffos 2013; 12 (02) 16-21
  • 20 Lilly CM, Aljawadi M, Badawi O. , et al. Comparative effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors vs. histamine type-2 receptors blockers for preventing clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding during intensive care: a population-based study. Chest 2018; 154 (03) 557-566
  • 21 Semler MW, Self WH, Wanderer JP. , et al; SMART Investigators and the Pragmatic Critical Care Research Group. Balanced crystalloids versus saline in critically ill adults. N Engl J Med 2018; 378 (09) 829-839
  • 22 Self WH, Semler MW, Wanderer JP. , et al; SALT-ED Investigators. Balanced crystalloids versus saline in noncritically ill adults. N Engl J Med 2018; 378 (09) 819-828
  • 23 Krajewski ML, Raghunathan K, Paluszkiewicz SM, Schermer CR, Shaw AD. Meta-analysis of high- versus low-chloride content in perioperative and critical care fluid resuscitation. Br J Surg 2015; 102 (01) 24-36
  • 24 Serpa Neto A, Martin Loeches I, Klanderman RB. , et al; PROVE Network Investigators. Balanced versus isotonic saline resuscitation-a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in operation rooms and intensive care units. Ann Transl Med 2017; 5 (16) 323
  • 25 Handy JM, Soni N. Physiological effects of hyperchloraemia and acidosis. Br J Anaesth 2008; 101 (02) 141-150
  • 26 Sears A, Shneiderman B. Split menus: effectively using selection frequency to organize menus. ACM Trans Comput Interact 1994; 1: 27-51
  • 27 Jacobs BR, Hart KW, Rucker DW. Reduction in Clinical Variance Using Targeted Design Changes in Computerized Provider Order Entry (CPOE) order sets: impact on hospitalized children with acute asthma exacerbation. Appl Clin Inform 2012; 3 (01) 52-63
  • 28 Olson J, Hollenbeak C, Donaldson K, Abendroth T, Castellani W. Default settings of computerized physician order entry system order sets drive ordering habits. J Pathol Inform 2015; 6: 16
  • 29 Leis B, Frost A, Bryce R, Lyon AW, Coverett K. Altering standard admission order sets to promote clinical laboratory stewardship: a cohort quality improvement study. BMJ Qual Saf 2019; 28 (10) 846-852
  • 30 McGreevey III JD. Order sets in electronic health records: principles of good practice. Chest 2013; 143 (01) 228-235
  • 31 Li RC, Wang JK, Sharp C, Chen JH. When order sets do not align with clinician workflow: assessing practice patterns in the electronic health record. BMJ Qual Saf 2019; 28 (12) 987-996
  • 32 Rosenbloom ST, Chiu KW, Byrne DW, Talbert DA, Neilson EG, Miller RA. Interventions to regulate ordering of serum magnesium levels: report of an unintended consequence of decision support. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005; 12 (05) 546-553