Subscribe to RSS
Download PDF
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1709198
Resultado funcional dos pacientes submetidos a artrodese de joelho após artroplastia total infectada[∗]
Article in several languages: português | English
Resumo
Objetivo Avaliar de modo retrospectivo o resultado funcional dos pacientes submetidos a artrodese após falha séptica da artroplastia total de joelho.
Métodos Foram avaliados 18 pacientes com tempo médio de 3,7 anos de seguimento. A cirurgia de artrodese foi realizada com placa do tipo dynamic compression plate (DCP) estreita, anterior e medial, ou fixador externo em dois planos da articulação (Orthofix Bone Growth Therapy, Lewisville, TS, EUA), a critério do cirurgião.
Resultados O patógeno mais frequentemente encontrado foi o Staphylococcus aureus sensível a meticilina (38,9%). A discrepância de membros inferiores média foi de 3,63 cm. O da knee society score (KSS) médio foi de 68 pontos. Segundo a escala analógica visual de dor, 44% dos pacientes apresentaram pontuação zero no momento da avaliação, e 22,2% estavam muito insatisfeitos a despeito da consolidação óssea obtida. Os pacientes foram avaliados quanto à capacidade de deambular com ou sem auxílio de apoio.
Conclusão A cirurgia de artrodese do joelho se mostrou eficiente quanto ao controle do processo infeccioso e diminuição das queixas álgicas, porém a satisfação com o procedimento é baixa.
∗ Trabalho desenvolvido no Instituto Nacional de Traumatologia e Ortopedia Jamill Haddad, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Suporte Financeiro
Não houve suporte financeiro de fontes públicas, comerciais, ou sem fins lucrativos.
Publication History
Received: 23 October 2019
Accepted: 27 January 2020
Article published online:
10 June 2020
© 2020. Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
-
Referências
- 1 Wu CH, Gray CF, Lee GC. Arthrodesis should be strongly considered after failed two-stage reimplantation TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472 (11) 3295-3304
- 2 Kuzyk PR, Dhotar HS, Sternheim A, Gross AE, Safir O, Backstein D. Two-stage revision arthroplasty for management of chronic periprosthetic hip and knee infection: techniques, controversies, and outcomes. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2014; 22 (03) 153-164
- 3 de Carvalho Júnior LH, Temponi EF, Badet R. Infection after total knee replacement: diagnosis and treatment. Rev Bras Ortop 2013; 48 (05) 389-396
- 4 Peel TN, Buising KL, Dowsey MM. et al. Outcome of debridement and retention in prosthetic joint infections by methicillin-resistant staphylococci, with special reference to rifampin and fusidic acid combination therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2013; 57 (01) 350-355
- 5 Holmberg A, Thórhallsdóttir VG, Robertsson O. W-Dahl A, Stefánsdóttir A. 75% success rate after open debridement, exchange of tibial insert, and antibiotics nin knee prosthetic joint infections. Acta Orthop 2015; 86 (04) 457-462
- 6 Ottesen CS, Troelsen A, Sandholdt H, Jacobsen S, Husted H, Gromov K. Acceptable Success Rate in Patients With Periprosthetic Knee Joint Infection Treated With Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34 (02) 365-368
- 7 Matar WY, Jafari SM, Restrepo C, Austin M, Purtill JJ, Parvizi J. Preventing infection in total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92 (Suppl. 02) 36-46
- 8 Martín-Hervás C, Rodríguez-Merchán EC. Diagnosis by Imaging of the Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty. In: Rodríguez-Merchán EC, Oussedik S. editors. The Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty. Cham: Springer; 2018: 61-70
- 9 Mahmud T, Lyons MC, Naudie DD, Macdonald SJ, McCalden RW. Assessing the gold standard: a review of 253 two-stage revisions for infected TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470 (10) 2730-2736
- 10 Mittal Y, Fehring TK, Hanssen A, Marculescu C, Odum SM, Osmon D. Two-stage reimplantation for periprosthetic knee infection involving resistant organisms. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 (06) 1227-1231
- 11 Kim TW, Makani A, Choudhury R, Kamath AF, Lee GC. Patient-reported activity levels after successful treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27 (08) 81-85
- 12 Parvizi J, Zmistowski B, Adeli B. Periprosthetic joint infection: treatment options. Orthopedics 2010; 33 (09) 659
- 13 Jones RE, Russell RD, Huo MH. Alternatives to revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012; 94 (11 Suppl A): 137-140
- 14 Falahee MH, Matthews LS, Kaufer H. Resection arthroplasty as a salvage procedure for a knee with infection after a total arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987; 69 (07) 1013-1021
- 15 Somayaji HS, Tsaggerides P, Ware HE, Dowd GS. Knee arthrodesis--a review. Knee 2008; 15 (04) 247-254
- 16 Gottfriedsen TB, Schrøder HM, Odgaard A. Knee Arthrodesis After Failure of Knee Arthroplasty: A Nationwide Register-Based Study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2016; 98 (16) 1370-1377
- 17 Van Rensch PJ, Van de Pol GJ, Goosen JH, Wymenga AB, De Man FH. Arthrodesis of the knee following failed arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014; 22 (08) 1940-1948
- 18 Silva AL, Demange MK, Gobbi RG, da Silva TF, Pécora JR, Croci AT. Translation and Validation of the Knee Society Score - KSS for Brazilian Portuguese. Acta Ortop Bras 2012; 20 (01) 25-30
- 19 Mahomed N, Gandhi R, Daltroy L, Katz JN. The self-administered patient satisfaction scale for primary hip and knee arthroplasty. Arthritis (Egypt) 2011; 2011: 591253
- 20 Gofton JP. Studies in osteoarthritis of the hip. IV. Biomechanics and clinical considerations. Can Med Assoc J 1971; 104 (11) 1007-1011
- 21 Spina M, Gualdrini G, Fosco M, Giunti A. Knee arthrodesis with the Ilizarov external fixator as treatment for septic failure of knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Traumatol 2010; 11 (02) 81-88
- 22 Bruno AA, Kirienko A, Peccati A. et al. Knee arthrodesis by the Ilizarov method in the treatment of total knee arthroplasty failure. Knee 2017; 24 (01) 91-99
- 23 Sierra RJ, Trousdale RT, Pagnano MW. Above-the-knee amputation after a total knee replacement: prevalence, etiology, and functional outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85 (06) 1000-1004
- 24 Mozella AP, Palma IM, Souza AF, Gouget GO, Cobra HA. Amputação após falha ou complicação de artroplastia total de joelho: incidência, etiologia e resultados funcionais. Rev Bras Ortop 2013; 48 (05) 406-411
- 25 Balci HI, Saglam Y, Pehlivanoglu T, Sen C, Eralp L, Kocaoglu M. Knee Arthrodesis in Persistently Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2016; 29 (07) 580-588
- 26 Robinson M, Piponov HI, Ormseth A, Helder CW, Schwartz B, Gonzalez MH. Knee Arthrodesis Outcomes After Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty and Failure of Two-stage Revision With an Antibiotic Cement Spacer. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev 2018; 2 (01) e077
- 27 Conway JD, Mont MA, Bezwada HP. Arthrodesis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86 (04) 835-848
- 28 Balato G, Rizzo M, Ascione T, Smeraglia F, Mariconda M. Re-infection rates and clinical outcomes following arthrodesis with intramedullary nail and external fixator for infected knee prosthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2018; 19 (01) 361
- 29 Röhner E, Windisch C, Nuetzmann K, Rau M, Arnhold M, Matziolis G. Unsatisfactory outcome of arthrodesis performed after septic failure of revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97 (04) 298-301
- 30 Vadiee I, Backstein DJ. The Effectiveness of Repeat Two-Stage Revision for the Treatment of Recalcitrant Total Knee Arthroplasty Infection. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34 (02) 369-374