CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Ann Natl Acad Med Sci 2020; 56(01): 38-41
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1710163
Original Article

Is Magnetic Resonance Imaging Superior to Conventional Radiography in Neonates with Anorectal Malformation?

Sarita Chowdhary
1   Department of Paediatric Surgery, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Dinesh Kumar
2   Department of General Surgery, Motilal Nehru Medical College, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Shyamendra Pratap Sharma
1   Department of Paediatric Surgery, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
S. P. Sharma
1   Department of Paediatric Surgery, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Pranay Panigrahi
1   Department of Paediatric Surgery, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Introduction This study was conducted to evaluate the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in neonates with anorectal malformation (ARM).

Materials and Methods Newborns, referred to Pediatric Surgical Ward through General Surgery Outpatient Department and Emergency Department of Sir Sunderlal Hospital as a case of ARM, were included in the study. Unstable patients requiring urgent primary colostomy were excluded from the study. Forty neonates with ARM and 20 neonates having no ARM were included in the study ( 2 years, i.e., conducted between September 2018 and July 2020). The included patients were evaluated clinically and were subjected to an invertogram (after 24 hours of delivery), which is conventional radiography. Further, MRI was performed using 1.5 T superconductive system; 5 to 6 mm contiguous sections were obtained using a head or a body coil according to the size of the infant patient to obtain images with sharp anatomical detail: Sagittal, coronal, and axial conventional spin-echo T1-weighted images of the pelvic region were obtained in all patients, with perpendicular coronal plane and the axial plane parallel to pelvic floor.

Results The majority of patients (60%) were referred on day 3 of birth and rest were referred after 3 days of birth. Conventional radiography, that is, invertogram was done in all study population. Sixty per cent of the total included patients had supralevator location of rectal pouch. Conventional radiography was detected to be low type of ARM—all had infralevator position of rectal pouch in MRI, but 60% of the intermediate had supralevator level and all high abnormalities had supralevator level. These distribution anomalies were statistically significant. The levator ani length index and external anal sphincter length index were also compared and found to be thickest in intermediate type, thick in low types, and thin in high type of abnormalities, which is an added advantage of MRI over radiography.

Conclusion Preoperative assessment of ARM with MRI gives useful information regarding type of malformation as well as sphincter muscle and associated malformations. Large sample size was needed for future landmark in the field of ARM.



Publication History

Article published online:
03 May 2020

© .

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Wijers CH, van Rooij IA, Marcelis CL, Brunner HG, de Blaauw I, Roeleveld N. Genetic and nongenetic etiology of nonsyndromic anorectal malformations: a systematic review. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today 2014; 102 (04) 382-400
  • 2 Alamo L, Meyrat BJ, Meuwly JY, Meuli RA, Gudinchet F. Anorectal malformations: finding the pathway out of the labyrinth. Radiographics 2013; 33 (02) 491-512
  • 3 Holschneider A, Hutson J, Peña A. et al. Preliminary report on the International Conference for the Development of Standards for the Treatment of Anorectal Malformations. J Pediatr Surg 2005; 40 (10) 1521-1526
  • 4 Peña A, Devries PA. Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty: important technical considerations and new applications. J Pediatr Surg 1982; 17 (06) 796-811
  • 5 Levitt MA, Peña A. Anorectal malformations. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2007; 2: 33
  • 6 Tsoucalas G, Gentimi F, Kousoulis AA, Karamanou M, Androutsos G. Imperforate anus and perianal fistula in ancient Greek medical writings. Ann Gastroenterol 2012; 25 (03) 241-242
  • 7 McHugh K, Dudley NE, Tam P. Pre-operative MRI of anorectal anomalies in the newborn period. Pediatr Radiol 1995; 25 (Suppl. 01) S33-S36
  • 8 Nievelstein RA, Vos A, Valk J, Vermeij-Keers C. Magnetic resonance imaging in children with anorectal malformations: embryologic implications. J Pediatr Surg 2002; 37 (08) 1138-1145
  • 9 Smith ED. The bath water needs changing, but don’t throw out the baby: an overview of anorectal anomalies. J Pediatr Surg 1987; 22 (04) 335-348
  • 10 Thomeer MG, Devos A, Lequin M. et al. High resolution MRI for preoperative work-up of neonates with an anorectal malformation: a direct comparison with distal pressure colostography/fistulography. Eur Radiol 2015; 25 (12) 3472-3479
  • 11 Taccone A, Martucciello G, Dodero P. et al. New concepts in preoperative imaging of anorectal malformation. New concepts in imaging of ARM. Pediatr Radiol 1992; 22 (03) 196-199
  • 12 Long FR, Hunter JV, Mahboubi S, Kalmus A, Templeton Jr JM. Tethered cord and associated vertebral anomalies in children and infants with imperforate anus: evaluation with MR imaging and plain radiography. Radiology 1996; 200 (02) 377-382
  • 13 Beek FJ, Boemers TM, Beek FJ. et al. Spine evaluation in children with anorectal malformations. Pediatr Radiol 1995; 25 (Suppl. 01) S28-S32
  • 14 Heij HA, Nievelstein RA, de Zwart I, Verbeeten BW, Valk J, Vos A. Abnormal anatomy of the lumbosacral region imaged by magnetic resonance in children with anorectal malformations. Arch Dis Child 1996; 74 (05) 441-444
  • 15 deVries PA, Cox KL. Surgery of anorectal anomalies. Surg Clin North Am 1985; 65 (05) 1139-1169
  • 16 Sato Y, Pringle KC, Bergman RA. et al. Congenital anorectal anomalies: MR imaging. Radiology 1988; 168 (01) 157-162
  • 17 Fukuya T, Honda H, Kubota M. et al. Postoperative MRI evaluation of anorectal malformations with clinical correlation. Pediatr Radiol 1993; 23 (08) 583-586
  • 18 Peña A. Management of anorectal malformations during the newborn period. World J Surg 1993; 17 (03) 385-392
  • 19 Berdon WE, Baker DH, Santulli TV, Amoury R. The radiologic evaluation of imperforate anus. An approach correlated with current surgical concepts. Radiology 1968; 90 (03) 466-471