CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) 2021; 56(01): 061-068
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1713393
Artigo Original
Mão

Análise clínica e radiológica do resultado placa ponte versus fixador externo na fratura cominutiva do rádio distal[*]

Article in several languages: português | English
1   Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia de Joinville, Hospital Municipal São José, Joinville, SC, Brasil
,
Matheus da Silva Pereira
1   Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia de Joinville, Hospital Municipal São José, Joinville, SC, Brasil
,
2   Curso de Odontologia, Universidade da Região de Joinville (UNIVILLE), Joinville, SC, Brasil
,
Henrique Ayzemberg
3   Serviço de Residência Médica, Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia de Joinville, Hospital Municipal São José, Joinville, SC, Brasil
,
Valdir Steglich
3   Serviço de Residência Médica, Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia de Joinville, Hospital Municipal São José, Joinville, SC, Brasil
,
Tiago Salati Stangarlin
3   Serviço de Residência Médica, Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia de Joinville, Hospital Municipal São José, Joinville, SC, Brasil
› Author Affiliations

Resumo

Objetivo Avaliar e comparar os resultados clínicos e radiológicos de pacientes com fraturas cominutivas distais do rádio tratados com fixador externo ou placa ponte dorsal.

Métodos Foram analisados 45 pacientes, sendo 18 tratados com fixador externo, e 25, com placa ponte dorsal, após 1 ano de pós-operatório. Aplicou-se uma escala analógica de dor e o questionário Disabilities of the Arm, Shouder and Hand (DASH), além de análise radiográfica, da avaliação de força, e da amplitude de movimento. As análises estatísticas foram realizadas utilizando o teste qui-quadrado e o teste não paramétrico de Mann-Whitney.

Resultados A fratura foi mais comum em mulheres acima de 60 anos por queda do mesmo nível. Ambos os métodos demonstraram resultados funcional e radiológico similares. A infecção foi mais prevalente com o uso do fixador externo, mas a força de preensão residual foi melhor. Neuropatia simpático-reflexa foi mais comum com o uso da placa ponte dorsal.

Conclusão Não houve consenso da superioridade de um método em relação ao outro em nossa análise. Cada um dos métodos apresenta vantagens e desvantagens, mas ambos mostraram resultados bons e semelhantes. A escolha do tratamento deve ser atribuída ao perfil do trauma, às condições clínicas do paciente, à experiência do profissional, e à disponibilidade de materiais.

* Trabalho desenvolvido no Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia de Joinville, Hospital Municipal São José, Joinville, SC, Brasil.




Publication History

Received: 16 August 2019

Accepted: 15 April 2020

Article published online:
24 September 2020

© 2020. Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

 
  • Referências

  • 1 Alffram PA, Bauer GC. Epidemiology of fractures of the forearm. A biomechanical investigation of bone strength. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1962; 44-A: 105-114
  • 2 Arora R, Gabl M, Gschwentner M, Deml C, Krappinger D, Lutz M. A comparative study of clinical and radiologic outcomes of unstable colles type distal radius fractures in patients older than 70 years: nonoperative treatment versus volar locking plating. J Orthop Trauma 2009; 23 (04) 237-242
  • 3 Tumia N, Wardlaw D, Hallett J, Deutman R, Mattsson SA, Sandén B. Aberdeen Colles' fracture brace as a treatment for Colles' fracture. A multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003; 85 (01) 78-82
  • 4 Glickel SZ, Catalano LW, Raia FJ, Barron OA, Grabow R, Chia B. Long-term outcomes of closed reduction and percutaneous pinning for the treatment of distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg Am 2008; 33 (10) 1700-1705
  • 5 Lee DY, Park YJ, Park JS. A Meta-analysis of studies of volar locking plate fixation of distal radius fractures: conventional versus minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis. Clin Orthop Surg 2019; 11 (02) 208-219
  • 6 Handoll HHG, Madhok R. Closed reduction methods for treating distal radial fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; (01) CD003763
  • 7 LaMartina J, Jawa A, Stucken C, Merlin G, Tornetta III P. Predicting alignment after closed reduction and casting of distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg Am 2015; 40 (05) 934-939
  • 8 Piva Neto A, Lhamby FC. Fixação das fraturas da extremidade do rádio distal pela técnica de Kapandji: avaliação dos resultados radiológicos. Rev Bras Ortop 2011; 46 (04) 368-373
  • 9 Snow M, Kelly M, Jeyam M, Fahmy N. Functional versus position: a randomized controlled trial of interfocal Kirschner wiring of unstable distal radial fractures. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2007; 33 (01) 81-86
  • 10 Benson LS, Minihane KP, Stern LD, Eller E, Seshadri R. The outcome of intra-articular distal radius fractures treated with fragment-specific fixation. J Hand Surg Am 2006; 31 (08) 1333-1339
  • 11 Azad A, Intravia JM, Hill JR. et al. Carpal translocation following dorsal bridge plate fixation of distal radius fractures: a cadaveric study. J Wrist Surg 2019; 8 (03) 234-239
  • 12 Harley BJ, Scharfenberger A, Beaupre LA, Jomha N, Weber DW. Augmented external fixation versus percutaneous pinning and casting for unstable fractures of the distal radius--a prospective randomized trial. J Hand Surg Am 2004; 29 (05) 815-824
  • 13 Atroshi I, Brogren E, Larsson GU, Kloow J, Hofer M, Berggren AM. Wrist-bridging versus non-bridging external fixation for displaced distal radius fractures: a randomized assessor-blind clinical trial of 38 patients followed for 1 year. Acta Orthop 2006; 77 (03) 445-453
  • 14 Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. Am J Ind Med 1996; 29 (06) 602-608
  • 15 Barros Filho TEP, Lech O. Exame físico em ortopedia. 3ª. Ed. São Paulo: Editora Sarvier; 2017
  • 16 Vakhshori V, Alluri RK, Stevanovic M, Ghiassi A. Review of internal radiocarpal distraction plating for distal radius fracture fixation. Hand (N Y) 2018; 1558944718787877
  • 17 Hyatt BT, Hanel DP, Saucedo JM. Bridge plating for distal radius fractures in low-demand patients with assist devices. J Hand Surg Am 2019; 44 (06) 507-513
  • 18 Tinsley BA, Ilyas AM. Distal radius fractures in a functional quadruped: spanning bridge plate fixation of the wrist. Hand Clin 2018; 34 (01) 113-120
  • 19 Mishra AK, Sud AD, Prasad M, Kaul R, Singh CM. A comparative study of functional outcome of external fixation and volar plating in unstable distal radius fractures. Int J Res Orthop 2019; 5 (02) 326-334
  • 20 Saving J, Enocson A, Ponzer S, Mellstrand Navarro C. External Fixation Versus Volar Locking Plate for Unstable Dorsally Displaced Distal Radius Fractures-A 3-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Study. J Hand Surg Am 2019; 44 (01) 18-26
  • 21 Cui Z, Pan J, Yu B, Zhang K, Xiong X. Internal versus external fixation for unstable distal radius fractures: an up-to-date meta-analysis. Int Orthop 2011; 35 (09) 1333-1341
  • 22 Abramo A, Kopylov P, Geijer M, Tägil M. Open reduction and internal fixation compared to closed reduction and external fixation in distal radial fractures: a randomized study of 50 patients. Acta Orthop 2009; 80 (04) 478-485
  • 23 Kreder HJ, Hanel DP, Agel J. et al. Indirect reduction and percutaneous fixation versus open reduction and internal fixation for displaced intra-articular fractures of the distal radius: a randomised, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87 (06) 829-836
  • 24 Xu GG, Chan SP, Puhaindran ME, Chew WY. Prospective randomised study of intra-articular fractures of the distal radius: comparison between external fixation and plate fixation. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2009; 38 (07) 600-606
  • 25 Arora R, Lutz M, Deml C, Krappinger D, Haug L, Gabl M. A prospective randomized trial comparing nonoperative treatment with volar locking plate fixation for displaced and unstable distal radial fractures in patients sixty-five years of age and older. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93 (23) 2146-2153
  • 26 Xavier CR, Molin DC, Santos RM, Santos RD, Ferreira Neto JC. Tratamento cirúrgico das fraturas do radio distal com placa volar bloqueada: correlação dos resultados clínicos e radiográficos. Rev Bras Ortop 2011; 46 (05) 505-523
  • 27 Schønnemann JO, Hansen TB, Søballe K. Randomised study of non-bridging external fixation compared with intramedullary fixation of unstable distal radial fractures. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2011; 45 (4-5): 232-237
  • 28 Aita MA, Ferreira CH, Ibanez DS. et al. Ensaio clínico randomizado de osteossíntese percutânea e minimamente invasiva das fraturas da extremidade distal do rádio. Rev Bras Ortop 2014; 49 (03) 218-226
  • 29 McQueen M, Caspers J. Colles fracture: does the anatomical result affect the final function?. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1988; 70 (04) 649-651
  • 30 Andrade LE, Oliveira D, Barros JW. Tratamento das fraturas instáveis da extremidade distal do rádio com desvio volar utilizando-se placa de apoio. Acta Ortop Bras 2002; 10 (04) 5-9
  • 31 Zenke Y, Sakai A, Oshige T. et al. Clinical results of volar locking plate for distal radius fractures: conventional versus minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis. J Orthop Trauma 2011; 25 (07) 425-431
  • 32 Richard MJ, Katolik LI, Hanel DP, Wartinbee DA, Ruch DS. Distraction plating for the treatment of highly comminuted distal radius fractures in elderly patients. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37 (05) 948-956
  • 33 Lewis S, Mostofi A, Stevanovic M, Ghiassi A. Risk of tendon entrapment under a dorsal bridge plate in a distal radius fracture model. J Hand Surg Am 2015; 40 (03) 500-504