Facial Plast Surg 2020; 36(04): 404-415
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1713827
Original Article

The Male Facelift

Paul P. Daraei
1   Department of Facial Plastic Surgery, Rousso Facial Plastic Surgery, Mountain Brook, Alabama
,
Ryan V. Marshall
2   Department of Otolaryngology —Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
,
Austin S. Adams
1   Department of Facial Plastic Surgery, Rousso Facial Plastic Surgery, Mountain Brook, Alabama
,
Daniel E. Rousso
1   Department of Facial Plastic Surgery, Rousso Facial Plastic Surgery, Mountain Brook, Alabama
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Rhytidectomy techniques have evolved significantly since the procedure was first described in the early twentieth century. Techniques vary based on surgeon preference, patient characteristics, and the desired outcome. As facelifts are embraced by the general public and the frequency of rhytidectomy increases, attention to male patient-specific technique is critical. Male and female facelift techniques are fundamentally similar; however, there are nuances to patient selection and technique in males that guide the surgeon to improved postoperative outcomes. Attention to incision placement, trichophytic technique, and adjunct procedures will improve overall cosmesis in the male patient. Understanding of potential risks and their likelihood in the male patient will also minimize complications and allow for rapid recovery.



Publication History

Article published online:
31 August 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers
333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

 
  • References

  • 1 Rogers BD. History of the development of aesthetic surgery. In: Regnault P, Daniel RK. , eds. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. Boston/Toronto: Little, Brown & Co; 1984
  • 2 Cummings CW, Flint PW, Harker LA. , et al , eds. Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. 4th ed. Vol. 1. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2005: 714-749
  • 3 Skoog TG. Plastic surgery: the aging face. In: Skoog TG. , ed. Plastic Surgery: New Methods and Refinements. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1974
  • 4 Hamra ST. The deep-plane rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 86 (01) 53-61 , discussion 62–63
  • 5 Hamra ST. Composite rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 90 (01) 1-13
  • 6 Owsley JQ. Lifting the malar fat pad for correction of prominent nasolabial folds. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 91 (03) 463-474 , discussion 475–476
  • 7 Baker SR. Rhytidectomy. In: Cummings CW, Flint PW, Harker LA. , et al, eds. Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. 4th ed. Vol. 1. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2005: 714-749
  • 8 Rousso DE, Rutherford KD. Biplanar superficial musculoaponeurotic system imbrication rhytidectomy. Facial Plast Surg 2014; 30 (04) 380-393
  • 9 Baker SR. Deep plane rhytidectomy and variations. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2009; 17 (04) 557-573 , vi
  • 10 Baker DC. Lateral SMASectomy, plication and short scar facelifts: indications and techniques. Clin Plast Surg 2008; 35 (04) 533-550 , vi
  • 11 Choucair RJ, Hamra ST. Extended superficial musculaponeurotic system dissection and composite rhytidectomy. Clin Plast Surg 2008; 35 (04) 607-622 , vii
  • 12 Leach JL. Facelift. Operat Tech Otolaryngol 2007; 18: 189-194
  • 13 Perkins SW, Patel AB. Extended superficial muscular aponeurotic system rhytidectomy: a graded approach. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2009; 17 (04) 575-587 , vi
  • 14 Chang S, Pusic A, Rohrich RJ. A systematic review of comparison of efficacy and complication rates among face-lift techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (01) 423-433
  • 15 American Society of Plastic Surgeons. 2018 Plastic surgery statistics report. Available at: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/documents/News/Statistics/2018/cosmetic-procedures-men-2018.pdf . Accessed November 11, 2019
  • 16 Rohrich RJ, Stuzin JM, Ramanadham S, Costa C, Dauwe PB. The modern male rhytidectomy: lessons learned. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (02) 295-307
  • 17 Dedo DD. “How I do it”—plastic surgery. Practical suggestions on facial plastic surgery. A preoperative classification of the neck for cervicofacial rhytidectomy. Laryngoscope 1980; 90 (11 Pt 1): 1894-1896
  • 18 McCollough EG, Ha CD. The McCollough facial rejuvenation system: expanding the scope of a condition-specific algorithm. Facial Plast Surg 2012; 28 (01) 102-115
  • 19 Pitanguy I, Machado BH. Facial rejuvenation surgery: a retrospective study of 8788 cases. Aesthet Surg J 2012; 32 (04) 393-412
  • 20 Grover R, Jones BM, Waterhouse N. The prevention of haematoma following rhytidectomy: a review of 1078 consecutive facelifts. Br J Plast Surg 2001; 54 (06) 481-486
  • 21 Niamtu III J. Expanding hematoma in face-lift surgery: literature review, case presentations, and caveats. Dermatol Surg 2005; 31 (9 Pt 1): 1134-1144 (PMID: , discussion 1144)
  • 22 Rees TD, Barone CM, Valauri FA, Ginsberg GD, Nolan III WB. Hematomas requiring surgical evacuation following face lift surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 93 (06) 1185-1190
  • 23 Straith RE, Raju DR, Hipps CJ. The study of hematomas in 500 consecutive face lifts. Plast Reconstr Surg 1977; 59 (05) 694-698
  • 24 Moyer JS, Baker SR. Complications of rhytidectomy. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2005; 13 (03) 469-478
  • 25 Matarasso A, Elkwood A, Rankin M, Elkowitz M. National plastic surgery survey: face lift techniques and complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106 (05) 1185-1195 , discussion 1196
  • 26 McCollough EG, Perkins S, Thomas JR. Facelift: panel discussion, controversies, and techniques. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2012; 20 (03) 279-325
  • 27 Riefkohl R, Wolfe JA, Cox EB, McCarty Jr KS. Association between cutaneous occlusive vascular disease, cigarette smoking, and skin slough after rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986; 77 (04) 592-595
  • 28 Baker DC. Complications of cervicofacial rhytidectomy. Clin Plast Surg 1983; 10 (03) 543-562
  • 29 Jacono AA, Alemi AS, Russell JL. A meta-analysis of complication rates among different SMAS facelift techniques. Aesthet Surg J 2019; 39 (09) 927-942