Download PDF
Facial Plast Surg 2021; 37(01): 107-109
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1714673
Original Research

Sonic Rhinoplasty: Review and Updated Uses

Nikolaus Hjelm
1   Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Jared Goldfarb
1   Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Howard Krein
1   Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Ryan N. Heffelfinger
1   Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Edmund Pribitkin
1   Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The ultrasonic bone aspirator (UBA) allows for precision and provides ease of use in multiple steps of cosmetic and functional rhinoplasties. Its use has previously been described; however, since the publication of many studies the UBA has been improved and its applications for rhinoplasty have been modified and expanded. Both bony and cartilaginous modifications to the nose can be aided with the use of the UBA. From our experience, patient results have subjectively been found to be more acceptable, if not better, than with the use of other rhinoplasty instruments.

Keywords

sonic rhinoplasty - ultrasonic bone aspirator - functional rhinoplasty - cosmetic rhinoplasty

Note

No previously related publications of the same study.




Publication History

Article published online:
24 August 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Pribitkin E, Greywoode JD. Sonic rhinoplasty: innovative applications. Facial Plast Surg 2013; 29 (02) 127-132
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Greywoode JD, Pribitkin EA. Sonic rhinoplasty: histologic correlates and technical refinements using the ultrasonic bone aspirator. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2011; 13 (05) 316-321
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Pribitkin EA, Lavasani LS, Shindle C, Greywoode JD. Sonic rhinoplasty: sculpting the nasal dorsum with the ultrasonic bone aspirator. Laryngoscope 2010; 120 (08) 1504-1507
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Greywoode JD, Van Abel K, Pribitkin EA. Ultrasonic bone aspirator turbinoplasty: a novel approach for management of inferior turbinate hypertrophy. Laryngoscope 2010; 120 (Suppl. 04) S239
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Stryker, “Sonopet.” Stryker. Accessed at: https://www.stryker.com/us/en/nse/products/sonopet-ultrasonic-aspirator.html
    PubMed
  • 6 Cochran CS, Roostaeian J. Use of the ultrasonic bone aspirator for lateral osteotomies in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132 (06) 1430-1433
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Ketcham AS, Han JK. Complications and management of septoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2010; 43 (04) 897-904
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Roy S, Iloreta AM, Bryant LM, Krein HD, Pribitkin EA, Heffelfinger RN. Piriform aperture enlargement for nasal obstruction. Laryngoscope 2015; 125 (11) 2468-2471
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Marianetti TM, Boccieri A, Pascali M. Reshaping of the anterior nasal spine: an important step in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2016; 4 (09) e1026
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Inoue T, Ikezaki K, Sato Y. Ultrasonic surgical system (SONOPET) for microsurgical removal of brain tumors. Neurol Res 2000; 22 (05) 490-494
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Hosseini P, Mundis Jr GM, Eastlack R. et al. Is there a role for an ultrasonic bone-cutting device in adult spinal deformity: a safety and reproducibility study. Shafa Ortho J 2016; 3 (03) e7461
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Bertossi D, Albanese M, Mortellaro C. et al. Osteotomy in genioplasty by piezosurgery. J Craniofac Surg 2018; 29 (08) 2156-2159
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Bertossi D, Nocini R, Luciano U. et al. Piezoelectric surgery inserts vs conventional burst: a clinical investigation. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents 2018; 32 (02) (Suppl. 02) 15-19
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Bertossi D, Lucchese A, Albanese M. et al. Piezosurgery versus conventional osteotomy in orthognathic surgery: a paradigm shift in treatment. J Craniofac Surg 2013; 24 (05) 1763-1766
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Sivak-Callcott JA, Linberg JV, Patel S. Ultrasonic bone removal with the Sonopet Omni: a new instrument for orbital and lacrimal surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 2005; 123 (11) 1595-1597
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Chappell MC, Moe KS, Chang SH. Learning curve for use of the Sonopet ultrasonic aspirator in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Orbit 2014; 33 (04) 270-275
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Bruggers S, Sindwani R. Evolving trends in powered endoscopic sinus surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2009; 42 (05) 789-798 , viii
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar