Download PDF
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021; 69(06): 557-563
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1715598
Original Thoracic

Robotic-Assisted Lobectomy Favors Early Lung Recovery versus Limited Thoracotomy

Valérie Lacroix
1   Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, IREC, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Bruxelles, Belgium
,
David Kahn
2   Department of Anesthesiology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Bruxelles, Belgium
,
Pascal Matte
1   Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, IREC, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Bruxelles, Belgium
,
Thierry Pieters
3   Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Bruxelles, Belgium
,
Philippe Noirhomme
1   Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, IREC, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Bruxelles, Belgium
,
Alain Poncelet
1   Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, IREC, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Bruxelles, Belgium
,
Arnaud Steyaert
2   Department of Anesthesiology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Bruxelles, Belgium
4   Institute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique de Louvain, Bruxelles, Belgium
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Abstract

Background Postoperative pulmonary recovery after lobectomy has showed early benefits for the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and sparing open techniques over nonsparing techniques. Robotic-assisted procedures offer benefits in term of clinical outcomes, but their advantages on pulmonary recovery and quality of life have not yet been distinctly prospectively studied.

Methods Eighty-six patients undergoing lobectomy over a period of 29 months were prospectively studied for their pulmonary function recovery and pain score level during the in-hospital stay and at 1, 2, and 6 months. Quality of life was evaluated at 2 and 6 months. Forty-five patients were operated by posterolateral limited thoracotomy and 41 patients by robotic approach. The postoperative analgesia protocol differed for the two groups, being lighter for the robotic group.

Results The pulmonary tests were not significantly different during the in-hospital stay. At 1 month, the forced expiratory volume in 1 second, forced vital capacity, vital capacity, and maximal expiratory pressure were significantly better for the robotic group (p = 0.05, 0.04, 0.05, and 0.02, respectively). There was no significant difference left at 2 and 6 months. Pain intensity was equivalent during the in-hospital stay but was significantly lower for the robotic group at 1 month (p = 0.02). At 2 and 6 months, pain and quality of life were comparable.

Conclusion Robotic technique can offer similar pulmonary and pain recovery during the in-hospital stay with a lighter analgesia protocol. It clearly favors the early term recovery compared with the open limited technique. The objective and subjective functional recovery becomes equivalent at 2 and 6 months.

Keywords

lung cancer - pulmonary function - quality of life - robotic approach - postoperative pain


Publication History

Received: 16 January 2020

Accepted: 17 June 2020

Article published online:
12 October 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Handy Jr JR, Asaph JW, Douville EC, Ott GY, Grunkemeier GL, Wu Y. Does video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer provide improved functional outcomes compared with open lobectomy?. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010; 37 (02) 451-455
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Nomori H, Horio H, Fuyuno G, Kobayashi R, Yashima H. Respiratory muscle strength after lung resection with special reference to age and procedures of thoracotomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1996; 10 (05) 352-358
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Nomori H, Horio H, Naruke T, Suemasu K. What is the advantage of a thoracoscopic lobectomy over a limited thoracotomy procedure for lung cancer surgery?. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 72 (03) 879-884
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Nomori H, Ohtsuka T, Horio H, Naruke T, Suemasu K. Difference in the impairment of vital capacity and 6-minute walking after a lobectomy performed by thoracoscopic surgery, an anterior limited thoracotomy, an anteroaxillary thoracotomy, and a posterolateral thoracotomy. Surg Today 2003; 33 (01) 7-12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Kaseda S, Aoki T, Hangai N, Shimizu K. Better pulmonary function and prognosis with video-assisted thoracic surgery than with thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 70 (05) 1644-1646
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Andreetti C, Menna C, Ibrahim M. et al. Postoperative pain control: videothoracoscopic versus conservative mini-thoracotomic approach. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2014; 46 (05) 907-912
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Stephens N, Rice D, Correa A. et al. Thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with improved short-term and equivalent oncological outcomes compared with open lobectomy for clinical Stage I non-small-cell lung cancer: a propensity-matched analysis of 963 cases. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2014; 46 (04) 607-613
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Nakata M, Saeki H, Yokoyama N, Kurita A, Takiyama W, Takashima S. Pulmonary function after lobectomy: video-assisted thoracic surgery versus thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 70 (03) 938-941
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Kneuertz PJ, D'Souza DM, Moffatt-Bruce SD, Merritt RE. Robotic lobectomy has the greatest benefit in patients with marginal pulmonary function. J Cardiothorac Surg 2018; 13 (01) 56
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Louie BE, Wilson JL, Kim S. et al. Comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and robotic approaches for clinical stage I and stage II non-small cell lung cancer using the society of thoracic surgeons database. Ann Thorac Surg 2016; 102 (03) 917-924
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Cerfolio RJ. Total port approach for robotic lobectomy. Thorac Surg Clin 2014; 24 (02) 151-156 , v
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Kwon ST, Zhao L, Reddy RM. et al. Evaluation of acute and chronic pain outcomes after robotic, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, or open anatomic pulmonary resection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017; 154 (02) 652-659.e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hu XF, Duan L, Jiang GN, Wang H, Liu HC, Chen C. A clinical risk model for the evaluation of bronchopleural fistula in non-small cell lung cancer after pneumonectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2013; 96 (02) 419-424
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Zanotti G, Mitchell JD. Bronchopleural fistula and empyema after anatomic lung resection. Thorac Surg Clin 2015; 25 (04) 421-427
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Lacroix V, Mosala Nezhad Z, Kahn D. et al. Pain, quality of life, and clinical outcomes after robotic lobectomy. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017; 65 (05) 344-350
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Cleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the brief pain inventory. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1994; 23 (02) 129-138
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Bouhassira D, Lantéri-Minet M, Attal N, Laurent B, Touboul C. Prevalence of chronic pain with neuropathic characteristics in the general population. Pain 2008; 136 (03) 380-387
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Pompili C, Novoa N, Balduyck B. ; ESTS Quality of life and Patient Safety Working Group. Clinical evaluation of quality of life: a survey among members of European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS). Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2015; 21 (04) 415-419
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Heuker D, Lengele B, Delecluse V. et al. Subjective and objective assessment of quality of life after chest wall resection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011; 39 (01) 102-108
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Leplège A, Ecosse E, Verdier A, Perneger TV. The French SF-36 Health Survey: translation, cultural adaptation and preliminary psychometric evaluation. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51 (11) 1013-1023
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Kim HK, Lee YJ, Han KN, Choi YH. Pulmonary function changes over 1 year after lobectomy in lung cancer. Respir Care 2016; 61 (03) 376-382
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Seok Y, Jheon S, Cho S. Serial changes in pulmonary function after video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy in lung cancer patients. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 62 (02) 133-139
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Nagahiro I, Andou A, Aoe M, Sano Y, Date H, Shimizu N. Pulmonary function, postoperative pain, and serum cytokine level after lobectomy: a comparison of VATS and conventional procedure. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 72 (02) 362-365
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Salati M, Brunelli A, Xiumè F. et al. Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy does not offer any functional recovery advantage in comparison to the open approach 3 months after the operation: a case matched analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2017; 51 (06) 1177-1182
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Maxwell C, Nicoara A. New developments in the treatment of acute pain after thoracic surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2014; 27 (01) 6-11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Pauli H, Eladawy M, Park J. Anesthesia for robotic thoracic surgery. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2019; 8 (02) 263-268
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Bayman EO, Brennan TJ. Incidence and severity of chronic pain at 3 and 6 months after thoracotomy: meta-analysis. J Pain 2014; 15 (09) 887-897
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Wildgaard K, Ringsted TK, Hansen HJ, Petersen RH, Kehlet H. Persistent postsurgical pain after video-assisted thoracic surgery—an observational study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2016; 60 (05) 650-658
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Bayman EO, Parekh KR, Keech J, Selte A, Brennan TJ. A prospective study of chronic pain after thoracic surgery. Anesthesiology 2017; 126 (05) 938-951
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Haroutiunian S, Nikolajsen L, Finnerup NB, Jensen TS. The neuropathic component in persistent postsurgical pain: a systematic literature review. Pain 2013; 154 (01) 95-102
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Rizk NP, Ghanie A, Hsu M. et al. A prospective trial comparing pain and quality of life measures after anatomic lung resection using thoracoscopy or thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2014; 98 (04) 1160-1166
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Bendixen M, Jørgensen OD, Kronborg C, Andersen C, Licht PB. Postoperative pain and quality of life after lobectomy via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or anterolateral thoracotomy for early stage lung cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2016; 17 (06) 836-844
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Ringsted TK, Wildgaard K, Kreiner S, Kehlet H. Pain-related impairment of daily activities after thoracic surgery: a questionnaire validation. Clin J Pain 2013; 29 (09) 791-799
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Skylizard L, Minnich DJ. Initial consecutive experience of completely portal robotic pulmonary resection with 4 arms. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 142 (04) 740-746
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar