Semin intervent Radiol 2020; 37(04): 346-355
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1715881
Review Article

Open Surgical Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Maintains a Pivotal Role in the Endovascular Era

Christopher D. Blackstock
1   Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Benjamin M. Jackson
1   Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Since the advent of endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) nearly three decades ago, there has been a paradigm shift in the treatment of the abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) to favor EVAR due to its reduced operative mortality, less invasive nature, and faster recovery times. However, more recently there has been an accumulation of data from large meta-analyses and randomized clinical trials revealing that EVAR has no survival benefit after approximately 2 years and is associated with substantially higher rates of reintervention and aneurysm rupture in the long term. These findings call into question the durability of EVAR compared with open aortic repair and emphasize the need for surgeons to remain competent with open aortic surgery in the modern era. This article will provide comprehensive review of a large body of literature comparing endovascular repair to open aortic surgery for the management of AAAs, and it will offer an overview of the open surgical repair technique for AAAs.



Publication History

Article published online:
01 October 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers
333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

 
  • References

  • 1 Swerdlow NJ, Wu WW, Schermerhorn ML. Open and endovascular management of aortic aneurysms. Circ Res 2019; 124 (04) 647-661
  • 2 Patel R, Sweeting MJ, Powell JT, Greenhalgh RM. EVAR Trial Investigators. Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in 15-years' follow-up of the UK endovascular aneurysm repair trial 1 (EVAR trial 1): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2016; 388 (10058): 2366-2374
  • 3 Lederle FA, Kyriakides TC, Stroupe KT. OVER Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group. , et al; Open versus endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med 2019; 380 (22) 2126-2135
  • 4 Schermerhorn ML, Buck DB, O'Malley AJ. , et al. Long-term outcomes of abdominal aortic aneurysm in the Medicare population. N Engl J Med 2015; 373 (04) 328-338
  • 5 Suckow BD, Goodney PP, Columbo JA. , et al. National trends in open surgical, endovascular, and branched-fenestrated endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in Medicare patients. J Vasc Surg 2018; 67 (06) 1690-1697.e1
  • 6 Chaikof EL, Dalman RL, Eskandari MK. , et al. The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 2018; 67 (01) 2-77.e2
  • 7 De Bruin JL, Baas AF, Buth J. DREAM Study Group. , et al; Long-term outcome of open or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med 2010; 362 (20) 1881-1889
  • 8 Becquemin JP, Pillet JC, Lescalie F. ACE Trialists. , et al; A randomized controlled trial of endovascular aneurysm repair versus open surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysms in low- to moderate-risk patients. J Vasc Surg 2011; 53 (05) 1167-1173.e1
  • 9 Li B, Khan S, Salata K. , et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the long-term outcomes of endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 2019; 70 (03) 954-969.e30
  • 10 Lederle FA, Freischlag JA, Kyriakides TC. Open Versus Endovascular Repair (OVER) Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group. , et al; Outcomes following endovascular vs open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a randomized trial. JAMA 2009; 302 (14) 1535-1542
  • 11 Rutherford RB. Randomized EVAR trials and advent of level i evidence: a paradigm shift in management of large abdominal aortic aneurysms?. Semin Vasc Surg 2006; 19 (02) 69-74
  • 12 Schanzer A, Greenberg RK, Hevelone N. , et al. Predictors of abdominal aortic aneurysm sac enlargement after endovascular repair. Circulation 2011; 123 (24) 2848-2855
  • 13 Kent KC. Clinical practice. Abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med 2014; 371 (22) 2101-2108
  • 14 Desgranges P, Kobeiter H, Katsahian S. ECAR Investigators. , et al; Editor's choice - ECAR (Endovasculaire ou Chirurgie dans les Anévrysmes aorto-iliaques Rompus): a French randomized controlled trial of endovascular versus open surgical repair of ruptured aorto-iliac aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2015; 50 (03) 303-310
  • 15 Reimerink JJ, Hoornweg LL, Vahl AC. Amsterdam Acute Aneurysm Trial Collaborators. , et al; Endovascular repair versus open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2013; 258 (02) 248-256
  • 16 IMPROVE Trial Investigators. Endovascular strategy or open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: one-year outcomes from the IMPROVE randomized trial. Eur Heart J 2015; 36 (31) 2061-2069
  • 17 Sweeting MJ, Balm R, Desgranges P, Ulug P, Powell JT. Ruptured Aneurysm Trialists. Individual-patient meta-analysis of three randomized trials comparing endovascular versus open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg 2015; 102 (10) 1229-1239
  • 18 Wang LJ, Locham S, Al-Nouri O, Eagleton MJ, Clouse WD, Malas MB. Endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm is superior to open repair: Propensity-matched analysis in the Vascular Quality Initiative. J Vasc Surg 2020; 72 (02) 498-507
  • 19 Edwards ST, Schermerhorn ML, O'Malley AJ. , et al. Comparative effectiveness of endovascular versus open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in the Medicare population. J Vasc Surg 2014; 59 (03) 575-582
  • 20 Gupta AK, Dakour-Aridi H, Locham S, Nejim B, Veith FJ, Malas MB. Real-world evidence of superiority of endovascular repair in treating ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 2018; 68 (01) 74-81
  • 21 Kontopodis N, Tavlas E, Ioannou CV, Giannoukas AD, Geroulakos G, Antoniou GA. Systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes of open and endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients with hostile vs. friendly aortic anatomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2020; 59 (05) 717-728
  • 22 Deery SE, Ergul EA, Schermerhorn ML. Vascular Study Group of New England. , et al; Aneurysm sac expansion is independently associated with late mortality in patients treated with endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2018; 67 (01) 157-164
  • 23 Antoniou GA, Georgiadis GS, Antoniou SA. , et al. Late rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm after previous endovascular repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endovasc Ther 2015; 22 (05) 734-744
  • 24 Herman CR, Charbonneau P, Hongku K. , et al. Any nonadherence to instructions for use predicts graft-related adverse events in patients undergoing elective endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2018; 67 (01) 126-133
  • 25 Kouvelos GN, Oikonomou K, Antoniou GA, Verhoeven ELG, Katsargyris A. A systematic review of proximal neck dilatation after endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Endovasc Ther 2017; 24 (01) 59-67
  • 26 Oliveira NFG, Gonçalves FB, Hoeks SE. , et al. Long-term outcomes of standard endovascular aneurysm repair in patients with severe neck angulation. J Vasc Surg 2018; 68 (06) 1725-1735
  • 27 Thompson JE. Early history of aortic surgery. J Vasc Surg 1998; 28 (04) 746-752
  • 28 Cooley DA. A brief history of aortic aneurysm surgery. Aorta (Stamford) 2013; 1 (01) 1-3
  • 29 Oransky I. Michael E DeBakey. Lancet 2008; 372 (9638): 530
  • 30 Fairman AS, Chin AL, Jackson BM. , et al. The evolution of open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair at a tertiary care center. J Vasc Surg 2020; DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.12.039. (epub ahead of print)
  • 31 Markar SR, Walsh SR, Griffin K, Khandanpour N, Tang TY, Boyle JR. Assessment of a multifactorial risk index for predicting postoperative pneumonia after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Vascular 2009; 17 (01) 36-39
  • 32 Patel VI, Lancaster RT, Conrad MF. , et al. Comparable mortality with open repair of complex and infrarenal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 2011; 54 (04) 952-959
  • 33 Varkevisser RRB, de Guerre LEMV, Swerdlow NJ. , et al. The impact of proximal clamp location on peri-operative outcomes following open surgical repair of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2020; 59 (03) 411-418
  • 34 Sarac TP, Clair DG, Hertzer NR. , et al. Contemporary results of juxtarenal aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2002; 36 (06) 1104-1111
  • 35 Oderich GS, Greenberg RK, Farber M. Zenith Fenestrated Study Investigators. , et al; Results of the United States multicenter prospective study evaluating the Zenith fenestrated endovascular graft for treatment of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2014; 60 (06) 1420-8.e1 , 5
  • 36 Etkin Y, Baig A, Foley PJ. , et al. Management of difficult access during endovascular aneurysm repair. Ann Vasc Surg 2017; 44: 77-82
  • 37 Cury M, Zeidan F, Lobato AC. Aortic disease in the young: genetic aneurysm syndromes, connective tissue disorders, and familial aortic aneurysms and dissections. Int J Vasc Med 2013; 2013: 267215
  • 38 Kouchoukos NT. Endovascular surgery in Marfan syndrome: CON. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2017; 6 (06) 677-681
  • 39 Waterman AL, Feezor RJ, Lee WA. , et al. Endovascular treatment of acute and chronic aortic pathology in patients with Marfan syndrome. J Vasc Surg 2012; 55 (05) 1234-1240 , 1240–1241
  • 40 Nakashima Y, Kurozumi T, Sueishi K, Tanaka K. Dissecting aneurysm: a clinicopathologic and histopathologic study of 111 autopsied cases. Hum Pathol 1990; 21 (03) 291-296
  • 41 Lombardi JV, Cambria RP, Nienaber CA. STABLE Investigators. , et al; Prospective multicenter clinical trial (STABLE) on the endovascular treatment of complicated type B aortic dissection using a composite device design. J Vasc Surg 2012; 55 (03) 629-640.e2
  • 42 Brunkwall J, Kasprzak P, Verhoeven E. ADSORB Trialists. , et al; Endovascular repair of acute uncomplicated aortic type B dissection promotes aortic remodelling: 1 year results of the ADSORB trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2014; 48 (03) 285-291
  • 43 Schwartz SI, Durham C, Clouse WD. , et al. Predictors of late aortic intervention in patients with medically treated type B aortic dissection. J Vasc Surg 2018; 67 (01) 78-84
  • 44 Johnston WF, Upchurch GR, Tracci MC, Cherry KJ, Ailawadi G, Kern JA. Staged hybrid approach using proximal thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair and distal open repair for the treatment of extensive thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2012; 56 (06) 1495-1502
  • 45 Brinster CJ, Fairman RM, Woo EY, Wang GJ, Carpenter JP, Jackson BM. Late open conversion and explantation of abdominal aortic stent grafts. J Vasc Surg 2011; 54 (01) 42-46
  • 46 Scali ST, Mcnally MM, Feezor RJ. , et al. Elective endovascular aortic repair conversion for type Ia endoleak is not associated with increased morbidity or mortality compared with primary juxtarenal aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2014; 60 (02) 286-294
  • 47 Jenkins M. EVAR NICE AAA Guidance: Where We Are Now and How We Got Here. Endovascular Today 2020;19(03). Accessed May 29, 2020 at: https://evtoday.com/articles/2020-mar/nice-aaa-guidance-where-we-are-now-and-how-we-got-here
  • 48 Abdominal aortic aneurysm: diagnosis and management. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK); 2020. . Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/gid-cgwave0769/. Accessed May 29, 2020