PDF herunterladen
Thromb Haemost 2021; 121(02): 140-149
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1716540
Coagulation and Fibrinolysis

Edoxaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation at the Extremes of Body Weight: An Analysis from the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Trial

Giuseppe Boriani
1   Cardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena & Reggio Emilia, Modena University Hospital, Modena, Italy
,
Christian T. Ruff
2   TIMI Study Group, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
,
Julia F. Kuder
2   TIMI Study Group, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
,
Minggao Shi
3   Daiichi Sankyo Inc., Basking Ridge, New Jersey, United States
,
Hans J. Lanz
4   Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH, Munich, Germany
,
Elliott M. Antman
2   TIMI Study Group, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
,
Eugene Braunwald
2   TIMI Study Group, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
,
Robert P. Giugliano
2   TIMI Study Group, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Background The effects of anticoagulants at extremes of body weight (BW) are not well described. The aim of this study was to analyze the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and clinical outcomes in patients randomized to warfarin, higher dose edoxaban (HDER), and lower dose edoxaban (LDER) regimens at extremes of BW in ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48.

Methods and Results We analyzed three BW groups: low BW (LBW: <5th percentile, ≤55 kg, N = 1,082), middle BW (MBW: 45th–55th percentile, 79.8–84 kg, N = 2,153), and high BW (HBW: >95th percentile, ≥120 kg, N = 1,093). In the warfarin arm, LBW patients had higher rates of stroke/systemic embolism (SSE: 6.5 vs. 4.7 in MBW vs. 1.6% in HBW, P trend < 0.001), major bleeding (MB: 9.3 vs. 7.7 vs. 6.5%, P trend = 0.08), and worse net clinical outcome of systemic embolic event, MB, or death (31.5 vs. 19.1 vs. 16.0%, P trend < 0.0001). The time-in-therapeutic range with warfarin was lowest in LBW patients (63.0 vs. 69.3 vs. 70.1% patients, P trend < 0.001). The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile of edoxaban was consistent across BW groups. The risk of SSE was similar between HDER and warfarin for each of the three weight groups (P int = 0.52, P int-trend = 0.86). MB was reduced by LDER versus warfarin (P int = 0.061, P int-trend = 0.023), especially in LBW patients. Net clinical outcomes were improved by HDER versus warfarin (P int = 0.087, P int-trend = 0.027), especially in LBW patients.

Conclusion Patients with LBW in ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 had in general a more fragile clinical status and poorer international normalized ratio control. The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile of edoxaban was consistent across extremes of BW, resulting in similar efficacy compared with warfarin, while major or clinically relevant non-MB and net outcomes were most favorable with edoxaban as compared to warfarin in LBW patients.

Keywords

anticoagulation - atrial fibrillation - edoxaban - factor Xa - pharmacokinetics - weight - underweight

Supplementary Material



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 29. April 2020

Angenommen: 03. August 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
13. September 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Leserbrief zu diesem Artikel:

Nonvitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Extreme Body Weights: One Size Fits All?Thromb Haemost 2021; 121(02): 115-117
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1718413

Leserbrief zu diesem Artikel:

Direct Oral Anticoagulant Dosing in Extremes of Body Weight: Time to Revisit the Guidelines?Thromb Haemost 2021; 121(02): 118-120
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1716753

 

  • References

  • 1 Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 1976; 16 (01) 31-41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Ruff CT, Ansell JE, Becker RC. et al. North American Thrombosis Forum, AF action initiative consensus document. Am J Med 2016; 129 (5, Suppl): S1-S29
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Steffel J, Verhamme P, Potpara TS. et al; ESC Scientific Document Group. The 2018 European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 2018; 39 (16) 1330-1393
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Lip GYH, Banerjee A, Boriani G. et al. Antithrombotic therapy for atrial fibrillation: CHEST guideline and expert panel report. Chest 2018; 154 (05) 1121-1201
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 De Caterina R, Lip GYH. The non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and extremes of body weight-a systematic literature review. Clin Res Cardiol 2017; 106 (08) 565-572
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Rocca B, Fox KAA, Ajjan RA. et al. Antithrombotic therapy and body mass: an expert position paper of the ESC Working Group on Thrombosis. Eur Heart J 2018; 39 (19) 1672-1686f
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Boriani G, Ruff CT, Kuder JF. et al. Relationship between body mass index and outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with edoxaban or warfarin in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial. Eur Heart J 2019; 40 (19) 1541-1550
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Green B, Duffull SB. What is the best size descriptor to use for pharmacokinetic studies in the obese?. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2004; 58 (02) 119-133
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Martin K, Beyer-Westendorf J, Davidson BL, Huisman MV, Sandset PM, Moll S. Use of the direct oral anticoagulants in obese patients: guidance from the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost 2016; 14 (06) 1308-1313
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H. et al. 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019; 74 (01) 104-132
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Chen A, Stecker E. , A Warden B. Direct oral anticoagulant use: a practical guide to common clinical challenges. J Am Heart Assoc 2020; 9 (13) e017559
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Ruff CT, Giugliano RP, Antman EM. et al. Evaluation of the novel factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: design and rationale for the Effective aNticoaGulation with factor xA next GEneration in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction study 48 (ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48). Am Heart J 2010; 160 (04) 635-641
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Giugliano RP, Ruff CT, Braunwald E. et al; ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Investigators. Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2013; 369 (22) 2093-2104
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Boriani G, Savelieva I, Dan GA. et al; Document reviewers. Chronic kidney disease in patients with cardiac rhythm disturbances or implantable electrical devices: clinical significance and implications for decision making-a position paper of the European Heart Rhythm Association endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society and the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society. Europace 2015; 17 (08) 1169-1196
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Steffel J, Giugliano RP, Braunwald E. et al. Edoxaban versus warfarin in atrial fibrillation patients at risk of falling: ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016; 68 (11) 1169-1178
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Nicolau AM, Corbalan R, Nicolau JC. et al. Efficacy and safety of edoxaban compared to warfarin according to the burden of diseases in patients with atrial fibrillation: insights from the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother 2020; 6 (03) 167-175
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Quan H, Li B, Couris CM. et al. Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. Am J Epidemiol 2011; 173 (06) 676-682
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Ruff CT, Giugliano RP, Braunwald E. et al. Association between edoxaban dose, concentration, anti-factor Xa activity, and outcomes: an analysis of data from the randomised, double-blind ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial. Lancet 2015; 385 (9984): 2288-2295
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Yin OQP, Antman EM, Braunwald E. et al. Linking endogenous factor Xa activity, a biologically relevant pharmacodynamic marker, to edoxaban plasma concentrations and clinical outcomes in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial. Circulation 2018; 138 (18) 1963-1973
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Balla SR, Cyr DD, Lokhnygina Y. et al. Relation of risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation to body mass index (from patients treated with rivaroxaban and warfarin in the rivaroxaban once daily oral direct factor Xa inhibition compared with vitamin K antagonism for prevention of stroke and embolism trial in atrial fibrillation trial). Am J Cardiol 2017; 119 (12) 1989-1996
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Hohnloser SH, Fudim M, Alexander JH. et al. Efficacy and safety of apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and extremes in body weight. Circulation 2019; 139 (20) 2292-2300
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kalani C, Awudi E, Alexander T, Udeani G, Surani S. Evaluation of the efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in comparison to warfarin in morbidly obese patients. Hosp Pract (1995) 2019; 47 (04) 181-185
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Kushnir M, Choi Y, Eisenberg R. et al. Efficacy and safety of direct oral factor Xa inhibitors compared with warfarin in patients with morbid obesity: a single-centre, retrospective analysis of chart data. Lancet Haematol 2019; 6 (07) e359-e365
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Netley J, Howard K, Wilson W. Effects of body mass index on the safety and effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants: a retrospective review. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2019; 48 (03) 359-365
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Piran S, Traquair H, Chan N, Bhagirath V, Schulman S. Peak plasma concentration of direct oral anticoagulants in obese patients weighing over 120 kilograms: a retrospective study. Res Pract Thromb Haemost 2018; 2 (04) 684-688
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Lee SR, Choi EK, Park CS. et al. Direct oral anticoagulants in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and low body weight. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019; 73 (08) 919-931
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Zulkifly H, Lip GYH, Lane DA. Use of the SAMe-TT2R2 score to predict anticoagulation control in atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism patients receiving vitamin K antagonists: a review. Heart Rhythm 2018; 15 (04) 615-623
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Lin KJ, Singer DE, Glynn RJ. et al. Prediction score for anticoagulation control quality among older adults. J Am Heart Assoc 2017; 6 (10) e006814
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar