Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2021; 15(02): 259-265
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1718477
Original Article

Effect of Different Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness and Gloss of Novel Nanohybrid Resin Composites

Hanan A. N. Soliman
1   Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh, Egypt
,
Naglaa Rizk Elkholany
2   Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
,
Hamdi H. Hamama 
2   Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
,
Fatma M. EL-Sharkawy
3   Department of Photometry, National Institute of Standards, Giza, Egypt
,
Salah H. Mahmoud
2   Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
,
John C. Comisi 
4   Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Restorative Dentistry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, United States
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate the surface roughness and gloss of three nanohybrid resin composites after polishing with three different polishing systems.

Materials and Methods A total number of 112 disc specimens (10 × 3 mm) were prepared from nanohybrid—Empress Direct (ID), Grandio (GR), Filtek Z350 (Z350) and a microhybrid resin composite restorative materials—Filtek Z250 (Z250). Following 24-hour storage in 37°C distilled water, each composite group (n = 28) was assigned into four groups (n = 7) according to finishing/polishing (F/P) system: Mylar strip, Optrapol, Politip, and Sof-Lex (SL). The surface roughness (Ra, mm) was measured by a novel three-dimensional method using an image analysis software attached to an environmental scanning electron microscope. A glossometer was used to measure the surface gloss.

Results Statistical analysis used was ANOVA test. Two-way Anova test revealed that the “type of composite” and “F/P techniques” had a significant effect on both surface roughness and gloss of the tested resin composite materials (p < 0.05). Tukey’s post hoc test showed that ID, GR, and Z350 revealed lower surface roughness and higher surface gloss than Z250 within the same polishing system (p < 0.05). Sof-Lex polishing discs produced the lowest surface roughness and highest surface gloss values compared with Optrapol and Politip (p < 0.05).

Conclusion The tested F/P systems provided comparable surface roughness and gloss for nanohybrid composites. The Sof-Lex system provided the best surface roughness and gloss for nanohybrid composites.

Keywords

microhybrid - nanohybrid - roughness - gloss - polish - resin composite restorative material


Publication History

Article published online:
27 October 2020

© 2020. European Journal of Dentistry. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Hossam AE, Rafi AT, Ahmed AS, Sumanth PC. Surface topography of composite restorative materials following ultrasonic scaling and its Impact on bacterial plaque accumulation. An in-vitro SEM study. J Int Oral Health 2013; 5 (03) 13-19
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Hafez R, Ahmed D, Yousry M, El-Badrawy W, El-Mowafy O. Effect of in-office bleaching on color and surface roughness of composite restoratives. Eur J Dent 2010; 4 (02) 118-127
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Bansal K, Gupta S, Nikhil V, Jaiswal S, Jain A, Aggarwal N. Effect of different finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of resin composite and enamel: an in vitro profilometric and scanning electron microscopy study. Int J Appl Basic Med Res 2019; 9 (03) 154-158
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Madhyastha PS, Hegde S, Srikant N, Kotian R, Iyer SS. Effect of finishing/polishing techniques and time on surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2017; 14 (05) 326-330
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Sturz CR, Faber F-J, Scheer M, Rothamel D, Neugebauer J. Effects of various chair-side surface treatment methods on dental restorative materials with respect to contact angles and surface roughness. Dent Mater J 2015; 34 (06) 796-813
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Beltrami R, Ceci M, De Pani G. et al. Effect of different surface finishing/polishing procedures on color stability of esthetic restorative materials: a spectrophotometric evaluation. Eur J Dent 2018; 12 (01) 49-56
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Camino Navarro R. Abrasion Effects on Time-Lasting Ceramic Stains and Glazes: A Comparison of Color Stability and Gloss Retention. 2019. https://doi.org/10.17615/h4pr-eg13
  • 8 Suh YR, Ahn JS, Ju SW, Kim KM. Influences of filler content and size on the color adjustment potential of nonlayered resin composites. Dent Mater J 2017; 36 (01) 35-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Cenci MS, Venturini D, Pereira-Cenci T, Piva E, Demarco FF. The effect of polishing techniques and time on the surface characteristics and sealing ability of resin composite restorations after one-year storage. Oper Dent 2008; 33 (02) 169-176
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Pratap B, Gupta RK, Bhardwaj B, Nag M. Resin based restorative dental materials: characteristics and future perspectives. Jpn Dent Sci Rev 2019; 55 (01) 126-138
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Yazici AR, Tuncer D, Antonson S, Onen A, Kilinc E. Effects of delayed finishing/polishing on surface roughness, hardness and gloss of tooth-coloured restorative materials. Eur J Dent 2010; 4 (01) 50-56
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 da J Costa, Adams-Belusko A, Riley K, Ferracane JL. The effect of various dentifrices on surface roughness and gloss of resin composites. J Dent 2010; 38 (Suppl 2) e123-e128
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Koh R, Neiva G, Dennison J, Yaman P. Finishing systems on the final surface roughness of composites. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008; 9 (02) 138-145
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 de Oliveira ALBM, Garcia PP, Santos PAd, Campos JÁDB. Surface roughness and hardness of a composite resin: influence of finishing and polishing and immersion methods. Mater Res 2010; 13 (03) 409-415
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Watanabe T, Miyazaki M, Takamizawa T, Kurokawa H, Rikuta A, Ando S. Influence of polishing duration on surface roughness of resin composites. J Oral Sci 2005; 47 (01) 21-25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 O’Brien WJ, Johnston WM, Fanian F, Lambert S. The surface roughness and gloss of composites. J Dent Res 1984; 63 (05) 685-688
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Da Costa J, Ferracane J, Paravina RD, Mazur RF, Roeder L. The effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of various resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2007; 19 (04) 214-224, discussion 225–226
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Lefever D, Perakis N, Roig M, Krejci I, Ardu S. The effect of toothbrushing on surface gloss of resin composites. Am J Dent 2012; 25 (01) 54-58
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Rizzi SC, Heath DJ, Coombes AG, Bock N, Textor M, Downes S. Biodegradable polymer/hydroxyapatite composites: surface analysis and initial attachment of human osteoblasts. J Biomed Mater Res 2001; 55 (04) 475-486
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Uçtaşli MB, Arisu HD, Omürlü H, Eligüzeloğlu E, Ozcan S, Ergun G. The effect of different finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of different composite restorative materials. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007; 8 (02) 89-96
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Aytac F, Karaarslan ES, Agaccioglu M, Tastan E, Buldur M, Kuyucu E. Effects of novel finishing and polishing systems on surface roughness and morphology of nanocomposites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2016; 28 (04) 247-261
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kakaboura A, Fragouli M, Rahiotis C, Silikas N. Evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scanning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2007; 18 (01) 155-163
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Yap AU, Yap SH, Teo CK, Ng JJ. Finishing/polishing of composite and compomer restoratives: effectiveness of one-step systems. Oper Dent 2004; 29 (03) 275-279
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Antonson SA, Yazici AR, Kilinc E, Antonson DE, Hardigan PC. Comparison of different finishing/polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of resin composites. J Dent 2011; 39 (Suppl 1) e9-e17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Başeren M. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid composite resin and ormocer-based tooth-colored restorative materials after several finishing and polishing procedures. J Biomater Appl 2004; 19 (02) 121-134
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Deljoo Z, Sadeghi M, Azar Mr, Bagheri R. The effect of different polishing methods and storage media on discoloration of resin composites. J Dent Biomater 2016; 3 (02) 226-232
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Venturini D, Cenci MS, Demarco FF, Camacho GB, Powers JM. Effect of polishing techniques and time on surface roughness, hardness and microleakage of resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 2006; 31 (01) 11-17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Ritter AV. Posterior resin-based composite restorations: clinical recommendations for optimal success. J Esthet Restor Dent 2001; 13 (02) 88-99
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Rodrigues-Junior SA, Chemin P, Piaia PP, Ferracane JL. Surface roughness and gloss of actual composites as polished with different polishing systems. Oper Dent 2015; 40 (04) 418-429
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Lopes GC, Franke M, Maia HP. Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 88 (01) 32-36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Jones CS, Billington RW, Pearson GJ. The in vivo perception of roughness of restorations. Br Dent J 2004; 196 (01) 42-45, discussion 31
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Shintani H, Satou J, Satou N, Hayashihara H, Inoue T. Effects of various finishing methods on staining and accumulation of Streptococcus mutans HS-6 on composite resins. Dent Mater 1985; 1 (06) 225-227
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Botta AC, Duarte Jr S, Paulin Filho PI, Gheno SM, Powers JM. Surface roughness of enamel and four resin composites. Am J Dent 2009; 22 (05) 252-254
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes BN. An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. J Am Dent Assoc 2003; 134 (10) 1382-1390
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Lu H, Lee YK, Oguri M, Powers JM. Properties of a dental resin composite with a spherical inorganic filler. Oper Dent 2006; 31 (06) 734-740
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Petschelt A. Strength and fatigue performance versus filler fraction of different types of direct dental restoratives. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2006; 76 (01) 114-120
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Beun S, Glorieux T, Devaux J, Vreven J, Leloup G. Characterization of nanofilled compared to universal and microfilled composites. Dent Mater 2007; 23 (01) 51-59
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Heintze SD, Forjanic M, Ohmiti K, Rousson V. Surface deterioration of dental materials after simulated toothbrushing in relation to brushing time and load. Dent Mater 2010; 26 (04) 306-319
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Paravina RD, Roeder L, Lu H, Vogel K, Powers JM. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on surface roughness, gloss and color of resin-based composites. Am J Dent 2004; 17 (04) 262-266
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Kameyama A, Nakazawa T, Haruyama A, Haruyama C, Hosaka M, Hirai Y. Influence of finishing/polishing procedures on the surface texture of two resin composites. Oper Dent 2008; 2: 56-60
    Google Scholar