Appl Clin Inform 2020; 11(05): 742-754
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1718535
Research Article

Transitions from One Electronic Health Record to Another: Challenges, Pitfalls, and Recommendations

Chunya Huang
1   Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Scranton, Pennsylvania, United States
2   Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Louisville School of Medicine—Louisville, Kentucky, United States
,
Ross Koppel
3   Deparments of Biomedical Informatics and of Sociology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
4   Department of Biomedical Informatics, University at Buffalo (SUNY), Buffalo, New York, United States
,
John D. McGreevey III
5   Division of General Internal Medicine, Section of Hospital Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Institute for Biomedical Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
,
Catherine K. Craven
6   Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Clinical Informatics Group, IT Department, Mount Sinai Health System, Institute for Healthcare Delivery Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States
,
Richard Schreiber
7   Physician Informatics and Department of Medicine, Geisinger Holy Spirit, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, United States
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Objective We address the challenges of transitioning from one electronic health record (EHR) to another—a near ubiquitous phenomenon in health care. We offer mitigating strategies to reduce unintended consequences, maximize patient safety, and enhance health care delivery.

Methods We searched PubMed and other sources to identify articles describing EHR-to-EHR transitions. We combined these references with the authors' extensive experience to construct a conceptual schema and to offer recommendations to facilitate transitions.

Results Our PubMed query retrieved 1,351 citations: 43 were relevant for full paper review and 18 met the inclusion criterion of focus on EHR-to-EHR transitions. An additional PubMed search yielded 1,014 citations, for which we reviewed 74 full papers and included 5. We supplemented with additional citations for a total of 70 cited. We distinguished 10 domains in the literature that overlap yet present unique and salient opportunities for successful transitions and for problem mitigation.

Discussion There is scant literature concerning EHR-to-EHR transitions. Identified challenges include financial burdens, personnel resources, patient safety threats from limited access to legacy records, data integrity during migration, cybersecurity, and semantic interoperability. Transition teams must overcome inadequate human infrastructure, technical challenges, security gaps, unrealistic providers' expectations, workflow changes, and insufficient training and support—all factors affecting potential clinician burnout.

Conclusion EHR transitions are remarkably expensive, laborious, personnel devouring, and time consuming. The paucity of references in comparison to the topic's salience reinforces the necessity for this type of review and analysis. Prudent planning may streamline EHR transitions and reduce expenses. Mitigating strategies, such as preservation of legacy data, managing expectations, and hiring short-term specialty consultants can overcome some of the greatest hurdles. A new medical subject headings (MeSH) term for EHR transitions would facilitate further research on this topic.

Authors' Contributions

R.S. conceptualized and organized the AMIA 2015 panel discussion, conceived of this manuscript, and wrote the first outline. C.H. wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed significantly to the intellectual content of the manuscript and approved the final version for submission.


Protection of Human and Animal Subject

This paper includes neither experimental data nor personal health information. It is research that does not involve human subjects as defined in 45 CFR 46.102(f). The authors found no requirement for institutional review board review.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 31 May 2020

Accepted: 07 September 2020

Article published online:
11 November 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Penrod LE. Electronic health record transition considerations. PM R 2017; 9 (5S) S13-S18
  • 2 Price S. Making the CEHRT Switch: EHR upgrade required for incentive payment programs. Tex Med 2019; 115 (01) 40-42
  • 3 Lammers EJ, Zheng K. Characteristics associated with hospital health IT vendor switching and dropping. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2011; 2011: 742-749
  • 4 Adler KG, Edsall RL. EHR switch survey: responses from 305 family physicians. Fam Pract Manag 2015; 22 (01) 13-18
  • 5 Zandieh SO, Abramson EL, Pfoh ER, Yoon-Flannery K, Edwards A, Kaushal R. Transitioning between ambulatory EHRs: a study of practitioners' perspectives. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012; 19 (03) 401-406
  • 6 Evans RS. Electronic health records: then, now, and in the future. Yearb Med Inform 2016; Suppl 1 (suppl 1) S48-S61
  • 7 Zandieh SO, Mills SA, Yoon-Flannery K, Yoon-Flannery K, Kuperman GJ, Kaushal R. Providers' expectations of ambulatory electronic health records (EHRs). AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2008; 1191 PMID:18998972
  • 8 Schreiber R, Koppel R, Craven C, McGreevey J. What could go wrong? Migrating from one EHR to another. Presented at the: AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2015; San Francisco, CA
  • 9 Jones S, Koppel R, Ridgely M. Guide to Reducing Unintended Consequences of Electronic Health Records. Available at: https://digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/guide-to-reducing-unintended-consequences-of-electronic-health-records.pdf. Accessed September 21, 2020
  • 10 Wilson L. EHR DO-OVER? Providers begin replacing electronic patient record systems. Health Data Manag 2017; 25 (01) 56-58
  • 11 Barkholz D. Vanderbilt is a case study for the dreaded EHR conversion. Mod Healthc 2017; 47 (19) 10-11
  • 12 Cohen JK. I'd like to phone a friend: CIOs favor peer input over rankings when choosing an EHR system. Available at: https://www.pressreader.com/usa/modern-healthcare/20190422/281900184609872. Accessed August 21, 2020
  • 13 Jones HW. Exploring HIT Contract Cadavers to Avoid HIT Managerial Malpractice. In: HIT or Miss: Lessons Learned from Health Information Technology Implementations. 3rd ed. Bethesda, Maryland: AHIMA Press; 2019: 209-222
  • 14 Koppel R. Great promises of healthcare information technology deliver less. In: Weaver CA, Ball MJ, Kim GR, Kiel JM. , eds. Healthcare Information Management Systems: Cases, Strategies, and Solutions. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2016: 101-125
  • 15 What is the Average IT Consulting Rate in DC, MD, and VA?. Available at: https://resource.optimalnetworks.com/blog/2015/01/15/it-consulting-rate-cost-dc-md-va. Accessed August 21, 2020
  • 16 Jayanthi A, Ellison A. 8 hospitals' finances hurt by EHR costs. Becker's Hospital CFO Report. . Available at: https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/finance/8-hospitals-finances-hurt-by-ehr-costs.html. Accessed August 21, 2020
  • 17 Braverman JA, Blumenthal-Barby JS. Assessment of the sunk-cost effect in clinical decision-making. Soc Sci Med 2012; 75 (01) 186-192
  • 18 Schreiber R, Garber L. Data migration: a thorny issue in electronic health record transitions—case studies and review of the literature. ACI Open. 2020; 04: e48-e58
  • 19 Gettinger A, Csatari A. Transitioning from a legacy EHR to a commercial, vendor-supplied, EHR: one academic health system's experience. Appl Clin Inform 2012; 3 (04) 367-376
  • 20 McEvoy D, Barnett ML, Sittig DF, Aaron S, Mehrotra A, Wright A. Changes in hospital bond ratings after the transition to a new electronic health record. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2018; 25 (05) 572-574
  • 21 Murphy K. Epic EHR Adoption Partly to Blame in Maine Hospital Debate. EHR Intelligence.. Published May 2, 2013. Available at: https://ehrintelligence.com/news/epic-ehr-adoption-partly-to-blame-in-maine-hospital-debate. Accessed August 21, 2020
  • 22 Yuan N, Dudley RA, Boscardin WJ, Lin GA. Electronic health records systems and hospital clinical performance: a study of nationwide hospital data. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2019; 26 (10) 999-1009
  • 23 Adler-Milstein J, Everson J, Lee S-YD. EHR Adoption and Hospital Performance: Time-Related Effects. Health Serv Res 2015; 50 (06) 1751-1771
  • 24 Ray JM, Ratwani RM, Sinsky CA. et al. Six habits of highly successful health information technology: powerful strategies for design and implementation. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2019; 26 (10) 1109-1114
  • 25 Magrabi F, Liaw ST, Arachi D, Runciman W, Coiera E, Kidd MR. Identifying patient safety problems associated with information technology in general practice: an analysis of incident reports. BMJ Qual Saf 2016; 25 (11) 870-880
  • 26 Makar M. Dealing with existing data in legacy systems when transitioning between Electronic Health Records in three Swedish counties. Available at: https://ki.se/sites/default/files/migrate/dealing_mina_makar.pdf. Accessed August 21, 2020
  • 27 Pfoh ER, Abramson E, Zandieh S, Edwards A, Kaushal R. Satisfaction after the transition between electronic health record systems at six ambulatory practices. J Eval Clin Pract 2012; 18 (06) 1133-1139
  • 28 Saleem JJ, Herout J. Transitioning from one electronic health record (EHR) to another: a narrative literature review. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet 2018; 62 (01) 489-493
  • 29 Behlen FM, Sayre RE, Weldy JB, Michael JS. “Permanent” records: experience with data migration in radiology information system and picture archiving and communication system replacement. J Digit Imaging 2000; 13 (02) (Suppl. 01) 171-174
  • 30 Bornstein S. An integrated EHR at Northern California Kaiser Permanente: pitfalls, challenges, and benefits experienced in transitioning. Appl Clin Inform 2012; 3 (03) 318-325
  • 31 Lin J, Ranslam K, Shi F, Figurski M, Liu Z. Data migration from operating EMRs to OpenEMR with Mirth Connect. Stud Health Technol Inform 2019; 257: 288-292
  • 32 Epstein RH, Dexter F, Schwenk ES. Provider access to legacy electronic anesthesia records following implementation of an electronic health record system. J Med Syst 2019; 43 (05) 105
  • 33 Cahill R. Medical Record Retention. The Doctors Company. Available at: https://www.thedoctors.com/articles/medical-record-retention/. Accessed August 21, 2020
  • 34 Medical Record Shredding Guidelines for New York. Available at: https://www.confidata.com/news/paper-shredding/medical-record-shredding-guidelines/. Accessed 2020 August 21
  • 35 D'Amore JD, Mandel JC, Kreda DA. et al. Are Meaningful Use Stage 2 certified EHRs ready for interoperability? Findings from the SMART C-CDA Collaborative. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014; 21 (06) 1060-1068
  • 36 Mandel JC, Kreda DA, Mandl KD, Kohane IS, Ramoni RB. SMART on FHIR: a standards-based, interoperable apps platform for electronic health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2016; 23 (05) 899-908
  • 37 HL7 FHIR R4, Using Resources with Services and Service-oriented Architecture. Available at: http://hl7.org/fhir/services.html. Accessed August 21, 2020
  • 38 Yang Y, Zhang Y. Application of Mirth Connect interface integration engine in medical data transmission. Industrial Control Computer. 2016; 29: 112-113
  • 39 Camacho Rodriguez JC, Stäubert S, Löbe M. Automated import of clinical data from HL7 messages into OpenClinica and tranSMART using Mirth Connect. Stud Health Technol Inform 2016; 228: 317-321
  • 40 Bortis G. Experiences with Mirth: an open source health care integration engine. In: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Software Engineering. ICSE '08. Association for Computing Machinery 2008: 649-652 DOI: 10.1145/1368088.1368179
  • 41 Binney G, Cole-Poklewski T, Roomian T. et al. Effect of an electronic health record transition on the provision of recommended well child services in pediatric primary care practices. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2020; 59 (02) 188-197
  • 42 Abramson EL, Patel V, Malhotra S. et al. Physician experiences transitioning between an older versus newer electronic health record for electronic prescribing. Int J Med Inform 2012; 81 (08) 539-548
  • 43 Girard NJ. DRESSed for failure. AORN J 2015; 101 (04) 504 , 464
  • 44 Whalen K, Lynch E, Moawad I, John T, Lozowski D, Cummings BM. Transition to a new electronic health record and pediatric medication safety: lessons learned in pediatrics within a large academic health system. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2018; 25 (07) 848-854
  • 45 Classen DC, Resar R, Griffin F. et al. ‘Global trigger tool’ shows that adverse events in hospitals may be ten times greater than previously measured. Health Aff (Millwood) 2011; 30 (04) 581-589
  • 46 McGreevey III JD, Mallozzi CP, Perkins RM, Shelov E, Schreiber R. Reducing alert burden in electronic health records: state of the art recommendations from four health systems. Appl Clin Inform 2020; 11 (01) 1-12
  • 47 Wright A, Aaron S, Seger DL, Samal L, Schiff GD, Bates DW. Reduced effectiveness of interruptive drug-drug interaction alerts after conversion to a commercial electronic health record. J Gen Intern Med 2018; 33 (11) 1868-1876
  • 48 Zandieh SO, Yoon-Flannery K, Kuperman GJ, Langsam DJ, Hyman D, Kaushal R. Challenges to EHR implementation in electronic- versus paper-based office practices. J Gen Intern Med 2008; 23 (06) 755-761
  • 49 Colicchio TK, Del Fiol G, Scammon DL, Facelli JC, Bowes III WA, Narus SP. Comprehensive methodology to monitor longitudinal change patterns during EHR implementations: a case study at a large health care delivery network. J Biomed Inform 2018; 83: 40-53
  • 50 Noblin A, Cortelyou-Ward K, Cantiello J. et al. EHR implementation in a new clinic: a case study of clinician perceptions. J Med Syst 2013; 37 (04) 9955
  • 51 Zandieh SO, Yoon-Flannery K, Yoon-Flannery K, Kuperman GJ, Hyman D, Kaushal R. Correlates of expected satisfaction with electronic health records in office practices by practitioners. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. Published online November 6, 2008; 1190
  • 52 Reynolds TL, Clay B, Rudkin SE. et al. Migrating from one comprehensive commercial EHR to another: perceptions of front-line clinicians and staff. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2020; 2019: 765-773
  • 53 Hanauer DA, Branford GL, Greenberg G. et al. Two-year longitudinal assessment of physicians' perceptions after replacement of a longstanding homegrown electronic health record: does a J-curve of satisfaction really exist?. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2017; 24 (e1): e157-e165
  • 54 North F, Pecina JL, Tulledge-Scheitel SM, Chaudhry R, Matulis JC, Ebbert JO. Is a switch to a different electronic health record associated with a change in patient satisfaction?. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020; 27 (06) 867-876
  • 55 Pandit RR, Boland MV. The impact of an electronic health record transition on a glaucoma subspecialty practice. Ophthalmology 2013; 120 (04) 753-760
  • 56 Pirtle CJ, Reeder RR, Lehmann CU, Unertl KM, Lorenzi NM. Physician perspectives on training for an EHR implementation. Stud Health Technol Inform 2019; 264: 1318-1322
  • 57 Rosenbaum M. Will 2018 be the year healthcare addresses its turnover problem? Becker's Hospital CFO Report. Available at: https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/finance/will-2018-be-the-year-healthcare-addresses-its-turnover-problem.html. Accessed July 15, 2020
  • 58 Sieja A, Markley K, Pell J. et al. Optimization sprints: improving clinician satisfaction and teamwork by rapidly reducing electronic health record burden. Mayo Clin Proc 2019; 94 (05) 793-802
  • 59 Silverman HD, Steen EB, Carpenito JN, Ondrula CJ, Williamson JJ, Fridsma DB. Domains, tasks, and knowledge for clinical informatics subspecialty practice: results of a practice analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2019; 26 (07) 586-593
  • 60 Johnson KB, Sternberg Jr. P, Dubree M. An EPIC switch: observations and opportunities after go-live. J Med Syst 2018; 42 (09) 174
  • 61 Kannry J, Sengstack P, Thyvalikakath TP. et al. The chief clinical informatics officer (CCIO): AMIA task force report on CCIO knowledge, education, and skillset requirements. Appl Clin Inform 2016; 7 (01) 143-176
  • 62 Pageler NM, Grazier G'Sell MJ, Chandler W, Mailes E, Yang C, Longhurst CA. A rational approach to legacy data validation when transitioning between electronic health record systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2016; 23 (05) 991-994
  • 63 KLAS, The Arch Collaborative. Available at: http://klasresearch.com/arch-collaborative. Accessed August 21, 2020
  • 64 Wisniewski PJ, Knijnenburg BP, Lipford HR. Making privacy personal: Profiling social network users to inform privacy education and nudging. Int J Hum Comput Stud 2017; 98: 95-108
  • 65 Walker J, Koppel R. For healthcare cybersecurity the whole is weaker than the sum of the parts. Available at: https://thehealthcareblog.com/blog/2016/09/23/for-healthcare-cybersecurity-the-whole-is-weaker-than-the-sum-of-the-parts/. Accessed August 21, 2020
  • 66 Koppel R, Thimbleby H. Lessons from the 100 Nation Ransomware Attack. Accessed August 21, 2020 at: https://thehealthcareblog.com/blog/2017/05/14/lessons-from-the-100-nation-ransomware-attack/
  • 67 Health IT. Top 10 Tips for Cybersecurity in Health Care. Available at: https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/Top_10_Tips_for_Cybersecurity.pdf. Accessed August 21, 2020
  • 68 Craven CK, Sievert MC, Hicks LL, Alexander GL, Hearne LB, Holmes JH. CAH to CAH: EHR implementation advice to critical access hospitals from peer experts and other key informants. Appl Clin Inform 2014; 5 (01) 92-117
  • 69 Keenan G. Committing leadership resources: A CMIO and CPOE governance. In: Leviss J, Charney P, Corbit C. , eds. HIT or Miss: Lessons Learned from Health Information Technology Implementations. Bethesda, Maryland: AHIMA Press; 2019: 123-126
  • 70 Sittig DF, Wright A, Ash J, Singh H. New unintended adverse consequences of electronic health records. Yearb Med Inform 2016; (01) 7-12