Identification and Outcomes of Hospitalized Medically Ill Patients Who Are Candidates for Extended Duration ThromboprophylaxisFunding This study was funded by Janssen Scientific Affairs LLC, Titusville, Florida.
Background Extended duration thromboprophylaxis (ET) for approximately 30 days can effectively and safely reduce venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk in appropriately selected medically ill patients. We sought to estimate the proportion of hospitalized medically ill patients potentially qualifying for ET and assess their post-discharge clinical and economic outcomes using a large claims database.
Methods Using MarketScan claims from January 2012 to September 2018, we identified medically ill patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of heart failure, respiratory insufficiency, ischemic stroke, infection, or inflammatory disease and ≥1-additional risk factor for VTE. Patients < 40 years old, a length-of-stay < 3 or >30 days, receiving oral anticoagulation prior to index hospitalization or having an indication for full-dose anticoagulation were excluded, as were patients deemed high-risk for bleeding due to active, in-hospital treated cancer, gastroduodenal ulcer or bleeding within the prior 3 months, bronchiectasis, pulmonary cavitation or hemorrhage, or dual antiplatelet therapy use.
Results We identified 2,782,988 patients ≥40 years of age and admitted for a high-risk medical illness. Of these, 724,531 patients (26.0%) were identified as ET candidates. Patients' VTE risk appeared highest in the first 30 days post-discharge (1,532/724,531, 0.2%). Adjusted post-index hospitalization costs (2018 US$) for patients with a VTE within 30 days were higher than those without VTE (Δ = $32,623 at 30 days, Δ = $43,325 at 90 days, Δ = $53,668 at 365 days; p < 0.001 for all).
Conclusion Post-discharge VTE in high-risk patients with medical illness is associated with substantially increased costs.
Keywordsanticoagulation - extended duration thromboprophylaxis - medically ill - venous thromboembolism - prevention
Received: 05 June 2020
Accepted: 22 September 2020
31 October 2020 (online)
© 2020. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Stuttgart · New York
- 1 Cohen AT, Alikhan R, Arcelus JI. et al. Assessment of venous thromboembolism risk and the benefits of thromboprophylaxis in medical patients. Thromb Haemost 2005; 94 (04) 750-759
- 2 Samama MM. An epidemiologic study of risk factors for deep vein thrombosis in medical outpatients: the Sirius study. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160 (22) 3415-3420
- 3 Spyropoulos AC, Lipardi C, Xu J. et al. Improved benefit risk profile of rivaroxaban in a subpopulation of the MAGELLAN study. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2019; 25: 1076029619886022
- 4 Cohen AT, Spiro TE, Büller HR. MAGELLAN Investigators. et al. Rivaroxaban for thromboprophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients. N Engl J Med 2013; 368 (06) 513-523
- 5 Cohen AT, Harrington RA, Goldhaber SZ. APEX Investigators. et al. APEX Investigators. Extended thromboprophylaxis with betrixaban in acutely ill medical patients. N Engl J Med 2016; 375 (06) 534-544
- 6 Spyropoulos AC, Ageno W, Albers GW. MARINER Investigators. et al. Rivaroxaban for thromboprophylaxis after hospitalization for medical illness. N Engl J Med 2018; 379 (12) 1118-1127
- 7 Hansen L. The Truven Health MarketScan Databases for Life Sciences Researchers. Available at: https://truvenhealth.com/Portals/0/Assets/2017-MarketScan-Databases-Life-Sciences-Researchers-WP.pdf. Accessed March 1, 2019
- 8 Miao B, Chalupadi B, Clark B. et al. Proportion of US hospitalized medically ill patients who may qualify for extended thromboprophylaxis. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2019; 25: 1076029619850897
- 9 White RH, Garcia M, Sadeghi B. et al. Evaluation of the predictive value of ICD-9-CM coded administrative data for venous thromboembolism in the United States. Thromb Res 2010; 126 (01) 61-67
- 10 Rosenberg D, Eichorn A, Alarcon M, McCullagh L, McGinn T, Spyropoulos AC. External validation of the risk assessment model of the International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism (IMPROVE) for medical patients in a tertiary health system. J Am Heart Assoc 2014; 3 (06) e001152
- 11 US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer price index. Available at: https://www.bls.gov/cpi/. Accessed April 28, 2020
- 12 Benchimol EI, Smeeth L, Guttmann A. RECORD Working Committee. et al. The REporting of studies conducted using observational routinely-collected health data (RECORD) statement. PLoS Med 2015; 12 (10) e1001885
- 13 XARELTO® (rivaroxaban) tablets, for oral use, Prescribing information, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Titusville, NJ, March 2020. Available at: http://www.janssenlabels.com/package-insert/product-monograph/prescribing-information/XARELTO-pi.pdf. Accessed April 28, 2020
- 14 Gandhi SK, Salmon W, Kong SX, Zhao SZ. Administrative databases and outcomes assessment: an overview of issues and potential utility. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 1999; 5 (03) 215-222
- 15 Mahan CE, Burnett AE, Fletcher ML, Spyropoulos AC. Extended thromboprophylaxis in the acutely ill medical patient after hospitalization—a paradigm shift in post-discharge thromboprophylaxis. Hosp Pract (1995) 2018; 46 (01) 5-15
- 16 Hull RD. Relevance of immobility and importance of risk assessment management for medically ill patients. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2013; 19 (03) 268-276
- 17 Amin A, Neuman WR, Lingohr-Smith M, Menges B, Lin J. Influence of the duration of hospital length of stay on frequency of prophylaxis and risk for venous thromboembolism among patients hospitalized for acute medical illnesses in the USA. Drugs Context 2019; 8: 212568