Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2021; 15(02): 228-235
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1719215
Original Article

The Effect of Anadara granosa Shell’s–Stichopus hermanni Scaffold on CD44 and IL-10 Expression to Decrease Osteoclasts in Socket Healing

Rima Parwati Sari
1   Department of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Hang Tuah, Surabaya, Indonesia
,
Syamsulina Revianti
1   Department of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Hang Tuah, Surabaya, Indonesia
,
Dwi Andriani
1   Department of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Hang Tuah, Surabaya, Indonesia
,
Widyasri Prananingrum
2   Department of Biomaterial, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Hang Tuah, Surabaya, Indonesia
,
Retno Pudji Rahayu
3   Department of Oral Pathology and Maxilofacial, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
,
Sri Agus Sudjarwo
4   Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
› Author Affiliations Funding This study was supported by the National Research Program Grant (120/SP2H/LT/DRPM/IV/2017) and funded by the Indonesian Ministry of Research Technology and Higher Education.
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objectives This article aimed to investigate the effect of Anadara granosa (AG) shell’s–Stichopus hermanni scaffold on cluster of differentiation (CD)44 and interleukin-10 (IL-10) expression to decrease osteoclasts in socket healing.

Materials and Methods Thirty male Wistar rats were divided into five groups. The lower left incisor was extracted, then given a placebo for group control (K), the treatment group was administered with scaffold from AG shells, and a treatment group with scaffold from blood cockle shell–S. hermanni with the concentration of 0.4, 0.8, and 1.6% (AGSH0.4; AGSH0.8; AGSH1.6). We made a bone graft from a combination of AGSH extract using the freeze-dried method. The socket was sutured by silk braid immediately. Third and Seventh days postextraction, animals are killed. CD44 and IL-10 expression were examined with immunohistochemistry, as well as osteoclast was examined with hematoxylin-eosin.

Statistical Analysis The data were analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance (for CD44 and osteoclast) and Kruskal–Wallis’ test (for IL-10) followed by a post hoc test in which the result of p < 0.05.

Results Scaffold from a combination of AGSH increased CD44 expression significantly, which enhanced IL-10 expression thereby decreased the number of osteoclasts in socket healing on days 3 and 7.

Conclusion Scaffold of AG shell–S. hermanni with a concentration of 0.8% was effective to enhance CD44 and IL-10 expression to decrease osteoclast in socket healing after tooth extraction.

Keywords

Anadara granosa shell - Stichopus hermanni - hyaluronic acid - CD44 - IL-10 - osteoclast - socket healing


Publication History

Article published online:
28 January 2021

© 2021. European Journal of Dentistry. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Van der Weijden F, Dell’Acqua F, Slot DE. Alveolar bone dimensional changes of post-extraction sockets in humans: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol 2009; 36 (12) 1048-1058
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Morjaria KR, Wilson R, Palmer RM. Bone healing after tooth extraction with or without an intervention: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2014; 16 (01) 1-20
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Koh TJ, DiPietro LA. Inflammation and wound healing: the role of the macrophage. Expert Rev Mol Med 2011; 13 (23) e23
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Kitaura H, Kimura K, Ishida M, Kohara H, Yoshimatsu M, Takano-Yamamoto T. Immunological reaction in TNF-α-mediated osteoclast formation and bone resorption in vitro and in vivo. Clin Dev Immunol 2013; 2013 (181849) 181849
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Cao X. RANKL-RANK signaling regulates osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Bone Res 2018; 6 (35) 35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Kohli SS, Kohli VS. Role of RANKL-RANK/osteoprotegerin molecular complex in bone remodeling and its immunopathologic implications. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 2011; 15 (03) 175-181
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Claudino M, Garlet TP, Cardoso CR. et al. Down-regulation of expression of osteoblast and osteocyte markers in periodontal tissues associated with the spontaneous alveolar bone loss of interleukin-10 knockout mice. Eur J Oral Sci 2010; 118 (01) 19-28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Kim KH, Park JY, Park HS. et al. The influences of different ratios of biphasic calcium phosphate and collagen augmentation on posterior lumbar spinal fusion in rat model. Yonsei Med J 2017; 58 (02) 407-414
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Mao K, Zhou F, Cui F. et al. Preparation and properties of α-calcium sulphate hemihydrate and β-tricalcium phosphate bone substitute. Biomed Mater Eng 2013; 23 (03) 197-210
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Kresnoadi U, Rahayu RP, Ariani MD, Soesanto S. The potential of natural propolis extract combined with bovine bone graft in increasing heat shock protein 70 and osteocalcin on socket preservation. Eur J Dent 2020; 14 (01) 31-37
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Polo-Corrales L, Latorre-Esteves M, Ramirez-Vick JE. Scaffold design for bone regeneration. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2014; 14 (01) 15-56
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Dahiya P, Kamal R. Hyaluronic acid: a boon in periodontal therapy. N Am J Med Sci 2013; 5 (05) 309-315
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Schwertfeger KL, Cowman MK, Telmer PG, Turley EA, McCarthy JB. Hyaluronan, inflammation, and breast cancer progression. Front Immunol 2015; 6 (236) 236
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Litwiniuk M, Krejner A, Speyrer MS, Gauto AR, Grzela T. Hyaluronic acid in inflammation and tissue regeneration. Wounds 2016; 28 (03) 78-88
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Sari RP, Nurlaily I, Heryana RP, Fatmawati W, Ashrin MN. Combination of Anadara granosa shell-Stichopus hermanni gel on osteoblast-osteoclast and blood vessels in femur healing. J Int Dent Med Res 2020; 13 (02) 770-777
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Earl JS, Wood DJ, Milne SJ. Hydrothermal synthesis of hydroxyapatite. J Phys Conf Ser 2006; 26: 268-271
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Balá P. Mechanochemistry in Nanoscience and Minerals Engineering. Berlin: Springer; 2010. 103–132
    Google Scholar
  • 18 You F, Li Y, Zuo Y, Li J. The Influence of γ-Ray Irradiation on the Mechanical and Thermal Behaviors of nHA/PA66 Composite Scaffolds. The Scientific World Journal 2013 ; 2013 (162384):1–6
  • 19 Tanideh N, Dehghani Nazhvani S, Mojtahed Jaberi F. et al. The healing effect of BioGlue in articular cartilage defect of femoral condyle in experimental rabbit model. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2011; 13 (09) 629-633
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Lin W, Xu L, Zwingenberger S, Gibon E, Goodman SB, Li G. Mesenchymal stem cells homing to improve bone healing. J Orthop Translat 2017; 9: 19-27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Aya KL, Stern R. Hyaluronan in wound healing: rediscovering a major player. Wound Repair Regen 2014; 22 (05) 579-593
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Ruffell B, Johnson P. The regulation and function of hyaluronan binding by CD44 in the immune system. Glycoforum: Science of Hyaluronan Today. 2009. Available at: http://www.glycoforum.gr.jp/science/hyaluronan/HA32/HA32E.html. Accessed June 6, 2018
  • 23 Wolny PM, Banerji S, Gounou C. et al. Analysis of CD44-hyaluronan interactions in an artificial membrane system: insights into the distinct binding properties of high and low molecular weight hyaluronan. J Biol Chem 2010; 285 (39) 30170-30180
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Brancato SK, Albina JE. Wound macrophages as key regulators of repair: origin, phenotype, and function. Am J Pathol 2011; 178 (01) 19-25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Peranteau WH, Zhang L, Muvarak N. et al. IL-10 overexpression decreases inflammatory mediators and promotes regenerative healing in an adult model of scar formation. J Invest Dermatol 2008; 128 (07) 1852-1860
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 King A, Balaji S, Le LD, Crombleholme TM, Keswani SG. Regenerative wound healing: the role of interleukin-10. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 2014; 3 (04) 315-323
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Vigetti D, Viola M, Karousou E, De Luca G, Passi A. Metabolic control of hyaluronan synthases. Matrix Biol 2014; 35: 8-13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Lesley J, Gál I, Mahoney DJ. et al. TSG-6 modulates the interaction between hyaluronan and cell surface CD44. J Biol Chem 2004; 279 (24) 25745-25754
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Mittal M, Tiruppathi C, Nepal S. et al. TNFα-stimulated gene-6 (TSG6) activates macrophage phenotype transition to prevent inflammatory lung injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2016; 113 (50) E8151-E8158
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Takahashi N, Udagawa N, Suda T. Vitamin D endocrine system and osteoclasts. Bonekey Rep 2014; 3: 495
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Vieira AE, Repeke CE, Ferreira Junior SdeB. et al. Intramembranous bone healing process subsequent to tooth extraction in mice: micro-computed tomography, histomorphometric and molecular characterization. PLoS One 2015; 10 (05) e0128021
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar