J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2021; 82(05): 437-445
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1721001
Original Article

Complications Following Decompressive Craniectomy

1   Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic
2   Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic
,
Jan Mork
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic
2   Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic
,
Jiri Dostal
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic
2   Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic
,
Radek Tupy
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic
2   Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic
,
Jolana Mrackova
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic
2   Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic
,
Vladimir Priban
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic
2   Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic
› Author Affiliations
Funding This study was supported by the grant of Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic—Conceptual Development of Research Organization (Faculty Hospital in Pilsen - FNPl, 00669806).

Abstract

Background Decompressive craniectomy (DC) has become the definitive surgical procedure to manage a medically intractable rise in intracranial pressure. DC is a life-saving procedure resulting in lower mortality but also higher rates of severe disability. Although technically straightforward, DC is accompanied by many complications. It has been reported that complications are associated with worse outcome. We reviewed a series of patients who underwent DC at our department to establish the incidence and types of complications.

Methods We retrospectively evaluated the incidence of complications after DC performed in 135 patients during the time period from January 2013 to December 2018. Postoperative complications were evaluated using clinical status and CT during 6 months of follow-up. In addition, the impact of potential risk factors on the incidence of complications and the impact of complications on outcome were assessed.

Results DC was performed in 135 patients, 93 of these for trauma, 22 for subarachnoid hemorrhage, 13 for malignant middle cerebral artery infarction, and 7 for intracerebral hemorrhage. Primary DC was performed in 120 patients and secondary DC in 15 patients. At least 1 complication occurred in each of 100 patients (74%), of which 22 patients (22%) were treated surgically. The following complications were found: edema or hematoma of the temporal muscle (34 times), extracerebral hematoma (33 times), extra-axial fluid collection (31 times), hemorrhagic progression of contusions (19 times), hydrocephalus (12 times), intraoperative malignant brain edema (10 times), temporal muscle atrophy (7 times), significant intraoperative blood loss (6 times), epileptic seizures (5 times), and skin necrosis (4 times). Trauma (p = 0.0006), coagulopathy (p = 0.0099), and primary DC (p = 0.0252) were identified as risk factors for complications. There was no significant impact of complications on outcome.

Conclusions The incidence of complications following DC is high. However, we did not confirm a significant impact of complications on outcome. We emphasize that some phenomena are so frequent that they can be considered a consequence of primary injury or natural sequelae of the DC rather than its direct complication.



Publication History

Received: 17 February 2020

Accepted: 22 June 2020

Article published online:
22 February 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 González Rabelino GA, Fons C, Rey A, Roussos I, Campistol J. Craniectomy in herpetic encephalitis. Pediatr Neurol 2008; 39 (03) 201-203
  • 2 Adamo MA, Deshaies EM. Emergency decompressive craniectomy for fulminating infectious encephalitis. J Neurosurg 2008; 108 (01) 174-176
  • 3 Ong YK, Goh KY, Chan C. Bifrontal decompressive craniectomy for acute subdural empyema. Childs Nerv Syst 2002; 18 (6–7): discussion 344 340-343
  • 4 Badri S, Chen J, Barber J. et al. Mortality and long-term functional outcome associated with intracranial pressure after traumatic brain injury. Intensive Care Med 2012; 38 (11) 1800-1809
  • 5 Balestreri M, Czosnyka M, Hutchinson P. et al. Impact of intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure on severe disability and mortality after head injury. Neurocrit Care 2006; 4 (01) 8-13
  • 6 Hase U, Reulen HJ, Meinig G, Schürmann K. The influence of the decompressive operation on the intracranial pressure and the pressure-volume relation in patients with severe head injuries. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1978; 45 (1–2): 1-13
  • 7 Timofeev I, Czosnyka M, Nortje J. et al. Effect of decompressive craniectomy on intracranial pressure and cerebrospinal compensation following traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg 2008; 108 (01) 66-73
  • 8 Taylor A, Butt W, Rosenfeld J. et al. A randomized trial of very early decompressive craniectomy in children with traumatic brain injury and sustained intracranial hypertension. Childs Nerv Syst 2001; 17 (03) 154-162
  • 9 Cooper DJ, Rosenfeld JV, Murray L. DECRA Trial Investigators, Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group. et al. Decompressive craniectomy in diffuse traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med 2011; 364 (16) 1493-1502
  • 10 Hutchinson PJ, Kolias AG, Timofeev IS. RESCUEicp Trial Collaborators. et al. Trial of decompressive craniectomy for traumatic intracranial hypertension. N Engl J Med 2016; 375 (12) 1119-1130
  • 11 Vahedi K, Vicaut E, Mateo J. DECIMAL Investigators. et al. Sequential-design, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of early decompressive craniectomy in malignant middle cerebral artery infarction (DECIMAL Trial). Stroke 2007; 38 (09) 2506-2517
  • 12 Jüttler E, Schwab S, Schmiedek P. DESTINY Study Group. et al. Decompressive Surgery for the Treatment of Malignant Infarction of the Middle Cerebral Artery (DESTINY): a randomized, controlled trial. Stroke 2007; 38 (09) 2518-2525
  • 13 Hofmeijer J, Kappelle LJ, Algra A, Amelink GJ, van Gijn J, van der Worp HB. HAMLET investigators. Surgical decompression for space-occupying cerebral infarction (the Hemicraniectomy After Middle Cerebral Artery infarction with Life-threatening Edema Trial [HAMLET]): a multicentre, open, randomised trial. Lancet Neurol 2009; 8 (04) 326-333
  • 14 Vahedi K, Hofmeijer J, Juettler E. DECIMAL, DESTINY, and HAMLET investigators. et al. Early decompressive surgery in malignant infarction of the middle cerebral artery: a pooled analysis of three randomised controlled trials. Lancet Neurol 2007; 6 (03) 215-222
  • 15 Kurland DB, Khaladj-Ghom A, Stokum JA. et al. Complications associated with decompressive craniectomy: a systematic review. Neurocrit Care 2015; 23 (02) 292-304
  • 16 Stiver SI. Complications of decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury. Neurosurg Focus 2009; 26 (06) E7
  • 17 Yang XF, Wen L, Shen F. et al. Surgical complications secondary to decompressive craniectomy in patients with a head injury: a series of 108 consecutive cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2008; 150 (12) 1241-1247 , discussion 1248
  • 18 Gopalakrishnan MS, Shanbhag NC, Shukla DP, Konar SK, Bhat DI, Devi BI. Complications of decompressive craniectomy. Front Neurol 2018; 9: 977
  • 19 Honeybul S. Complications of decompressive craniectomy for head injury. J Clin Neurosci 2010; 17 (04) 430-435
  • 20 Honeybul S, Ho KM. Decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury: the relationship between surgical complications and the prediction of an unfavourable outcome. Injury 2014; 45 (09) 1332-1339
  • 21 Mracek J, Hommerova J, Mork J, Richtr P, Priban V. Complications of cranioplasty using a bone flap sterilised by autoclaving following decompressive craniectomy. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2015; 157 (03) 501-506
  • 22 Yadla S, Campbell PG, Chitale R, Maltenfort MG, Jabbour P, Sharan AD. Effect of early surgery, material, and method of flap preservation on cranioplasty infections: a systematic review. Neurosurgery 2011; 68 (04) 1124-1129 , discussion 1130
  • 23 Sundseth J, Sundseth A, Berg-Johnsen J, Sorteberg W, Lindegaard KF. Cranioplasty with autologous cryopreserved bone after decompressive craniectomy: complications and risk factors for developing surgical site infection. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2014; 156 (04) 805-811 , discussion 811
  • 24 Zanaty M, Chalouhi N, Starke RM. et al. Complications following cranioplasty: incidence and predictors in 348 cases. J Neurosurg 2015; 123 (01) 182-188
  • 25 Honeybul S, Ho KM. Long-term complications of decompressive craniectomy for head injury. J Neurotrauma 2011; 28 (06) 929-935
  • 26 André C, Py MdeO, Niemeyer-Filho P. Temporal muscle haematoma as a cause of suboptimal haemicraniectomy: case report. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2003; 61 (3A): 682-686
  • 27 Su TM, Lee TH, Chen WF, Lee TC, Cheng CH. Contralateral acute epidural hematoma after decompressive surgery of acute subdural hematoma: clinical features and outcome. J Trauma 2008; 65 (06) 1298-1302
  • 28 Hejazi N, Witzmann A, Fae P. Unilateral decompressive craniectomy for children with severe brain injury. Report of seven cases and review of the relevant literature. Eur J Pediatr 2002; 161 (02) 99-104
  • 29 De Bonis P, Sturiale CL, Anile C. et al. Decompressive craniectomy, interhemispheric hygroma and hydrocephalus: a timeline of events?. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2013; 115 (08) 1308-1312
  • 30 Flint AC, Manley GT, Gean AD, Hemphill III JC, Rosenthal G. Post-operative expansion of hemorrhagic contusions after unilateral decompressive hemicraniectomy in severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2008; 25 (05) 503-512
  • 31 Kenning TJ, Gooch MR, Gandhi RH, Shaikh MP, Boulos AS, German JW. Cranial decompression for the treatment of malignant intracranial hypertension after ischemic cerebral infarction: decompressive craniectomy and hinge craniotomy. J Neurosurg 2012; 116 (06) 1289-1298
  • 32 Takeuchi S, Nawashiro H, Wada K. et al. Ventriculomegaly after decompressive craniectomy with hematoma evacuation for large hemispheric hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2013; 115 (03) 317-322
  • 33 Heuts SG, Bruce SS, Zacharia BE. et al. Decompressive hemicraniectomy without clot evacuation in dominant-sided intracerebral hemorrhage with ICP crisis. Neurosurg Focus 2013; 34 (05) E4
  • 34 Kan P, Amini A, Hansen K. et al. Outcomes after decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury in children. J Neurosurg 2006; 105 (05) 337-342
  • 35 Wang EC, Ang BT, Wong J, Lim J, Ng I. Characterization of cerebrovascular reactivity after craniectomy for acute brain injury. Br J Neurosurg 2006; 20 (01) 24-30
  • 36 Bor-Seng-Shu E, Hirsch R, Teixeira MJ, De Andrade AF, Marino Jr R. Cerebral hemodynamic changes gauged by transcranial Doppler ultrasonography in patients with posttraumatic brain swelling treated by surgical decompression. J Neurosurg 2006; 104 (01) 93-100
  • 37 Bor-Seng-Shu E, Figueiredo EG, Amorim RL. et al. Decompressive craniectomy: a meta-analysis of influences on intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure in the treatment of traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg 2012; 117 (03) 589-596
  • 38 Olivecrona M, Rodling-Wahlström M, Naredi S, Koskinen LO. Effective ICP reduction by decompressive craniectomy in patients with severe traumatic brain injury treated by an ICP-targeted therapy. J Neurotrauma 2007; 24 (06) 927-935
  • 39 Missori P, Polli FM, Peschillo S, D'Avella E, Paolini S, Miscusi M. Double dural patch in decompressive craniectomy to preserve the temporal muscle: technical note. Surg Neurol 2008; 70 (04) 437-439 , discussion 439
  • 40 Evins AI, Dutton J, Imam SS. et al. On-demand intraoperative 3-dimensional printing of custom cranioplastic prostheses. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2018; 15 (03) 341-349
  • 41 Creutzfeldt CJ, Tirschwell DL, Kim LJ, Schubert GB, Longstreth Jr WT, Becker KJ. Seizures after decompressive hemicraniectomy for ischaemic stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2014; 85 (07) 721-725
  • 42 Santamarina E, Sueiras M, Toledo M. et al. Epilepsy in patients with malignant middle cerebral artery infarcts and decompressive craniectomies. Epilepsy Res 2015; 112: 130-136
  • 43 Chen JW, Ruff RL, Eavey R, Wasterlain CG. Posttraumatic epilepsy and treatment. J Rehabil Res Dev 2009; 46 (06) 685-696
  • 44 Di Rienzo A, Pangrazi PP, Riccio M, Colasanti R, Ghetti I, Iacoangeli M. Skin flap complications after decompressive craniectomy and cranioplasty: proposal of classification and treatment options. Surg Neurol Int 2016; 7 (Suppl. 28) S737-S745
  • 45 Vieira E, Guimarães TC, Faquini IV. et al. Randomized controlled study comparing 2 surgical techniques for decompressive craniectomy: with watertight duraplasty and without watertight duraplasty. J Neurosurg 2018; 129 (04) 1017-1023
  • 46 Yang HS, Hyun D, Oh CH, Shim YS, Park H, Kim E. A faster and wider skin incision technique for decompressive craniectomy: n-shaped incision for decompressive craniectomy. Korean J Neurotrauma 2016; 12 (02) 72-76
  • 47 Mracek J, Choc M, Mork J, Vacek P, Mracek Z. Osteoplastic decompressive craniotomy: an alternative to decompressive craniectomy. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2011; 153 (11) 2259-2263
  • 48 Mracek J, Mracek Z, Choc M. Tactical and technical notes for decompression craniotomy: a review. Rozhl Chir 2007; 86 (05) 217-223
  • 49 Lee MH, Yang JT, Weng HH. et al. Hydrocephalus following decompressive craniectomy for malignant middle cerebral artery infarction. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2012; 114 (06) 555-559
  • 50 Isago T, Nozaki M, Kikuchi Y, Honda T, Nakazawa H. Sinking skin flap syndrome: a case of improved cerebral blood flow after cranioplasty. Ann Plast Surg 2004; 53 (03) 288-292
  • 51 Dujovny M, Agner C, Aviles A. Syndrome of the trephined: theory and facts. Crit Rev Neurosurg 1999; 9 (05) 271-278
  • 52 Akins PT, Guppy KH. Sinking skin flaps, paradoxical herniation, and external brain tamponade: a review of decompressive craniectomy management. Neurocrit Care 2008; 9 (02) 269-276
  • 53 Jung HJ, Kim DM, Kim SW. Paradoxical transtentorial herniation caused by lumbar puncture after decompressive craniectomy. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2012; 51 (02) 102-104
  • 54 Fields JD, Lansberg MG, Skirboll SL, Kurien PA, Wijman CA. “Paradoxical” transtentorial herniation due to CSF drainage in the presence of a hemicraniectomy. Neurology 2006; 67 (08) 1513-1514
  • 55 Oyelese AA, Steinberg GK, Huhn SL, Wijman CA. Paradoxical cerebral herniation secondary to lumbar puncture after decompressive craniectomy for a large space-occupying hemispheric stroke: case report. Neurosurgery 2005; 57 (03) E594 , discussion E594
  • 56 Honeybul S. Decompressive craniectomy: a new complication. J Clin Neurosci 2009; 16 (05) 727-729
  • 57 Ban SP, Son YJ, Yang HJ, Chung YS, Lee SH, Han DH. Analysis of complications following decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2010; 48 (03) 244-250
  • 58 Picetti E, Caspani ML, Iaccarino C. et al. Intracranial pressure monitoring after primary decompressive craniectomy in traumatic brain injury: a clinical study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2017; 159 (04) 615-622