Comparative Analysis of Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate Measured by Automated and Manual Methods in Anaemic Patients

Abstract

Purpose Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) is a widely used indicator of inflammation and a routinely done hematology investigation to monitor patients of autoimmune and infectious diseases. We aimed to compare the ESR results obtained by Roller 20LC automated instrument and standard reference Westergren method and analyzed the effect of anemia (hematocrit) on ESR measurements through the automated method.

Methods We analyzed 1377 random anemic OPD patients (hematocrit [HCT] < 35%) for ESR levels measured by Roller 20LC using EDTA blood and Westergren method using citrated blood for a one and half year period from January 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019. Fabry’s formula was used to correct the Westergren ESR.

Results The total number of samples after evaluation were divided into low (n = 232), intermediate (n = 417), high (n = 406), and very high range of ESR (≥100 mm/hr; n = 422). Mean difference between values of corrected and automated ESR for the low, intermediate, high and very high ESR range was 2.33 ± 5.03, 10.95 ± 8.04, 28.22 ± 19.11 and 43.3 ± 19.22 mm/hr, respectively. The 95% limit of agreement calculated by the Bland–Altmann analysis between the two methods for low-ESR range was −7.53 to 12.2 (highest correlation coefficient –0.65), while for very high ESR, range was −5.1 to 81.5 (least coefficient of 0.18) (p < 0.001).

Conclusion In laboratories with high-sample load and where manual measurement may be tedious, the automated method of ESR measurement can safely replace the Westergren method for low-ESR values in patients with low hematocrit. While for high-ESR values, validation by the standard Westergren method may be needed.

Keywords

corrected ESR - Hematocrit - Fabry’s formula - Anemia

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
30. Dezember 2020

• References

• 1 Plebani M, Piva E. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate: use of fresh blood for quality control. Am J Clin Pathol 2002; 117 (04) 621-626
• 2 Westergren A. Studies of the suspension stability of the blood in pulmonary tuberculosis. Acta Med Scand 1921; 54: 247-282
• 3 Bull BS, Brecher G. An evaluation of the relative merits of the Wintrobe and Westergren sedimentation methods, including hematocrit correction. Am J Clin Pathol 1974; 62 (04) 502-510
• 4 Moseley DL, Bull BS. A comparison of the Wintrobe, the Westergren and the ZSR erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) methods to a candidate reference method. Clin Lab Haematol 1982; 4 (02) 169-178
• 5 Bain BJ. et al. Supplementary techniques including blood parasite diagnosis. In: Bimpong AO. ed. Dacie and Lewis Practical Haematology. 12th ed.. China: Elsevier; 2017: 93-111
• 6 Ozdem S, Akbas HS, Donmez L, Gultekin M. Comparison of TEST 1 with SRS 100 and ICSH reference method for the measurement of the length of sedimentation reaction in blood. Clin Chem Lab Med 2006; 44 (04) 407-412
• 7 Larsson A, Hansson LO. Analysis of inflammatory response in human plasma samples by an automated multicapillary electrophoresis system. Clin Chem Lab Med 2004; 42 (12) 1396-1400
• 8 Caswell M, Pike LA, Bull BS, Stuart J. Effect of patient age on tests of the acute-phase response. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1993; 117 (09) 906-910
• 9 Sonmez C, Dogan OC, Kaymak AO, Akkaya N, Akin KO, Guntas G. Test-1 analyzer and conventional Westergren method for erythrocyte sedimentation rate: A comparative study between two laboratories. J Clin Lab Anal 2018; 32 (05) e22384
• 10 Jou JM, Lewis SM, Briggs C, Lee SH, De La Salle B, McFadden S. International Council for Standardization in Haematology. ICSH review of the measurement of the erythocyte sedimentation rate. Int J Lab Hematol 2011; 33 (02) 125-132
• 11 Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Procedure for the Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) Test; Approved Standard (5th ed., H2–A5). Villanova, PA: CLSI; 2011
• 12 Kratz A, Plebani M, Peng M, Lee YK, McCafferty R, Machin SJ. International Council for Standardization in Haematology (ICSH). ICSH recommendations for modified and alternate methods measuring the erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Int J Lab Hematol 2017; 39 (05) 448-457
• 13 Hardeman MR, Levitus M, Pelliccia A, Bouman AA. Test 1 analyser for determination of ESR. 1. Practical evaluation and comparison with the Westergren technique. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2010; 70 (01) 21-25
• 14 Romero A, Muñoz M, Ramírez G. Length of sedimentation reaction in blood: a comparison of the test 1 ESR system with the ICSH reference method and the sedisystem 15. Clin Chem Lab Med 2003; 41 (02) 232-237
• 15 Arikan S, Akalin N. Comparison of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate measured by the Micro Test 1 sedimentation analyzer and the conventional Westergren method. Ann Saudi Med 2007; 27 (05) 362-365
• 16 Alifax. Available at: https://www.alifax.com. Accessed July 10, 2020
• 17 Dhruva G, Agravat A, Kakadiya M, Pansuriya H. Automated erythrocyte sedimentation rate analyser v/s the Westergren’s manual method in measurement of erythrocyte sedimentation rate: a comparative study. Med Sci 2014; 3: 376-378
• 18 Patil A, Deepak NM, Belurkar SV, Verma S. Validation of an erythrocyte sedimentation rate analyzer with modified Westergren method. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences. 2013; 2: 284-290
• 19 Subramanian A, Rangarajan K, Pandey RM, Gandhi JS, Sharma V, Bhoi SK. Evaluation of an automated erythrocyte sedimentation rate analyzer as compared to the Westergren manual method in measurement of erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2011; 54 (01) 70-74
• 20 AlFadhli SM, Al-Awadhi AM. Comparison of erythrocyte sedimentation rate measurement by the automated SEDIsystem and conventional Westergren method using the Bland and Altman statistical method. Med Princ Pract 2005; 14 (04) 241-244