Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1721480
Indispensability of Clinical Bioinformatics for Effective Implementation of Genomic Medicine in Pathology Laboratories
Funding None.Abstract
Patient care is rapidly evolving toward the inclusion of precision genomic medicine when genomic tests are used by clinicians to determine disease predisposition, prognosis, diagnosis, and improve therapeutic decision-making. However, unlike other clinical pathology laboratory tests, the development, deployment, and delivery of genomic tests and results are an intricate process. Genomic technologies are diverse, fast changing, and generate massive data. Implementation of these technologies in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-certified and College of American Pathologists-accredited pathology laboratory often require custom clinical grade computational data analysis and management workflows. Additionally, accurate classification and reporting of clinically actionable genetic mutation requires well-curated disease/application-specific knowledgebases and expertise. Moreover, lack of “out of the box” technical features in electronic health record systems necessitates custom solutions for communicating genetic information to clinicians and patients. Genomic data generated as part of clinical care easily adds great value for translational research. In this article, we discuss current and future innovative clinical bioinformatics solutions and workflows developed at our institution for effective implementation of precision genomic medicine across molecular pathology, patient care, and translational genomic research.
Keywords
bioinformatics - genome - medical informatics - pathology - diagnostic tests - clinical laboratory information systems - electronic health records - molecular testing - next-generation sequencing - cancerAuthors' Contributions
All authors participated in the conceptualization and design of the clinical genomics and bioinformatics protocol and workflows described in this manuscript. S.C., S.M., K.N., S.R.G., and R.D. lead the informatics implementation efforts. S.C., N.W., and R.D. took the lead in writing the manuscript with all authors' input. All authors provided critical feedback and approved the final version.
Publication History
Received: 29 June 2020
Accepted: 04 November 2020
Article published online:
31 December 2020
© 2020. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Hart SN. Will digital pathology be as disruptive as genomics?. J Pathol Inform 2018; 9: 27
- 2 Di Tommaso P, Chatzou M, Floden EW, Barja PP, Palumbo E, Notredame C. Nextflow enables reproducible computational workflows. Nat Biotechnol 2017; 35 (04) 316-319
- 3 Strozzi F. Scaling bioinformatics analysis using Nextflow and AWS. . Accessed February 20, 2020 at: https://www.slideshare.net/FrancescoStrozzi/nextflow-and-aws-batch-gccbosc-2018-104095847
- 4 Di Tommaso P. Reproducible Computational Pipelines with Docker and Nextflow. . Accessed February 20, 2020 at: https://www.slideshare.net/insideHPC/reproducible-computational-pipelines-with-docker-and-nextflow
- 5 Common Workflow Language, Computational Data Analysis Workflow Systems. Accessed June 8, 2020 at: https://s.apache.org/existing-workflow-systems%0A
- 6 Larsonneur E, Mercier J, Wiart N. , et al. Evaluating workflow management systems: a bioinformatics use case. . In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM). IEEE 2018 2773-2775
- 7 Di Tommaso P. Nextflow meets Dockstore. 2018 . Accessed May 26, 2020 at: https://www.nextflow.io/blog/2018/nextflow-meets-dockstore.html%0A
- 8 Pan J. Software Reliability. 1999 . Accessed May 26, 2020 at: https://users.ece.cmu.edu/∼koopman/des_s99/sw_reliability/
- 9 Ryan P, Schuemie M. Reliability, replication and reproducibility: examples and perspectives. 2017 . Accessed May 26, 2020 at: https://www.ohdsi.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/OHDSI-replication-and-reproducibility-Ryan-Schuemie-31jan2017.pdf
- 10 Merkel D. Docker: lightweight Linux containers for consistent development and deployment. Linux J 2014; 2014: 2
- 11 Docker Inc, Docker Hub.. 2014 . Accessed May 26, 2020 at: https://hub.docker.com/
- 12 Atlassian Inc Bitbucket. 2008. Accessed November 30, 2020 at: https://www.atlassian.com/software/bitbucket
- 13 Li MM, Datto M, Duncavage EJ. et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of sequence variants in cancer: a joint consensus recommendation of the Association for Molecular Pathology, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and College of American Pathologists. J Mol Diagn 2017; 19 (01) 4-23
- 14 HL7 International, HL7 Version 2.5.1 Implementation Guide Lab Results Interface(LRI), Release 1, STU Release 3–US Realm. 2017 . Accessed June 8, 2020 at: https://www.hl7.org/documentcenter/public/wg/clingenomics/20180403-V2LRI-Ch.5CGandCodeSystemTables.pdf
- 15 Sutton JA, Wix KK, Amusan AA. et al. Experiences and lessons learned from a new functionality for pharmacogenomics CDS in the electronic health record. 2018 . Accessed June 8, 2020 at: https://zerista.s3.amazonaws.com/item_files/1663/attachments/427873/original/amia_summit_2018_poster.pdf
- 16 Caraballo PJ, Sutton JA, Giri J. et al. Integrating pharmacogenomics into the electronic health record by implementing genomic indicators. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020; 27 (01) 154-158
- 17 eMERGE Consortium. Electronic address: agibbs@bcm.edu, eMERGE Consortium. Harmonizing clinical sequencing and interpretation for the eMERGE III network. Am J Hum Genet 2019; 105 (03) 588-605
- 18 Wynn J, Lewis K, Amendola LM. et al. Clinical providers' experiences with returning results from genomic sequencing: an interview study. BMC Med Genomics 2018; 11 (01) 45
- 19 Alterovitz G, Warner J, Zhang P. et al. SMART on FHIR Genomics: facilitating standardized clinico-genomic apps. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2015; 22 (06) 1173-1178
- 20 Warner JL, Rioth MJ, Mandl KD. et al. SMART precision cancer medicine: a FHIR-based app to provide genomic information at the point of care. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2016; 23 (04) 701-710
- 21 Mandel JC, Kreda DA, Mandl KD, Kohane IS, Ramoni RB. SMART on FHIR: a standards-based, interoperable apps platform for electronic health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2016; 23 (05) 899-908
- 22 Swaminathan R, Huang Y, Moosavinasab S, Buckley R, Bartlett CW, Lin SM. A review on genomics APIs. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2015; 14: 8-15
- 23 Walton NA, Johnson DK, Person TN. et al. Genomic data in the electronic health record. Adv Mol Pathol 2019; 2: 21-33
- 24 Dolin RH, Boxwala A, Shalaby J. A pharmacogenomics clinical decision support service based on FHIR and CDS Hooks. Methods Inf Med 2018; 57 (S 02): e115-e123
- 25 Masys DR, Jarvik GP, Abernethy NF. et al. Technical desiderata for the integration of genomic data into Electronic Health Records. J Biomed Inform 2012; 45 (03) 419-422
- 26 Starren J, Williams MS, Bottinger EP. Crossing the omic chasm: a time for omic ancillary systems. JAMA 2013; 309 (12) 1237-1238
- 27 Alterovitz G, Brown J, Chan M. et al. Enabling clinical genomics for precision medicine via HL7 fast healthcare interoperability resources. 2017 . Accessed June 10, 2020 at: https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/sync_for_genes_report_november_2017.pdf