CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Clinical Interventional Radiology ISVIR 2020; 4(03): 135-141
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1721529
Original Article

Direct Percutaneous Puncture and Embolization of Visceral Pseudoaneurysm: Safety and Clinical Efficacy

1   Department of Interventional Radiology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Davanagere, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
,
Jagadeesh R. Singh
1   Department of Interventional Radiology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Davanagere, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
,
Mahesh Kumar
1   Department of Interventional Radiology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Davanagere, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
,
K.N. Nagbhushan
1   Department of Interventional Radiology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Davanagere, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
,
Nageshwar D. Reddy
2   Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
,
G.V. Rao
3   Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Purpose The aim of the study is to assess the safety and clinical effectiveness of direct percutaneous embolization of visceral artery pseudoaneurysms.

Materials and Methods Retrospective analysis of patients who had undergone direct percutaneous embolization of visceral artery pseudoaneurysms between January 2012 and May 2017 was performed. The study included 26 patients with a mean age of 36 years (range 10–71 years). The indications for direct percutaneous embolization included the inability to catheterize endovascularly (n = 24) or prior embolization (n = 2) of the feeding artery. Patient demographics, details of the procedure, complications, and outcomes were evaluated. Patients were followed for a mean of 15 months to assess for recurrence of the pseudoaneurysms on ultrasound.

Results Splenic artery (n = 13), gastroduodenal artery (n = 4), right hepatic artery (n = 3), pancreaticoduodenal arteries (n = 3), left gastric artery (n = 2), and left hepatic artery (n = 1) were the embolized arteries. Etiology for pseudoaneurysm were pancreatitis (n = 20), trauma (n = 2), postoperative (n = 2), and few were incidentally detected (n = 2). N-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) with lipiodol was used in 23 (88.4%) patients, coil in one (3.8%), and both coil and NBCA in two patients (7.7%). Embolization of the pseudoaneurysm was successful in all cases. No procedure-related complication was observed. Follow-up showed no recurrence of the pseudoaneurysm. Self-limiting splenic infarct was seen in six patients. Self-limiting abdominal pain was seen in all the patients with embolization with NBCA. One patient developed liver infarct and subsequent liver abscess requiring percutaneous drainage.

Conclusion Direct percutaneous embolization is safe and effective in the treatment of visceral artery pseudoaneurysms and should be considered as an alternative in patients with a failed endovascular approach.



Publication History

Article published online:
24 December 2020

© 2020. Indian Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Belli AM, Markose G, Morgan R. The role of interventional radiology in the management of abdominal visceral artery aneurysms. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2012; 35 (02) 234-243
  • 2 Chadha M, Ahuja C. Visceral artery aneurysms: diagnosis and percutaneous management. Semin Intervent Radiol 2009; 26 (03) 196-206
  • 3 Saad NE, Saad WE, Davies MG, Waldman DL, Fultz PJ, Rubens DJ. Pseudoaneurysms and the role of minimally invasive techniques in their management. Radiographics 2005; 25 (Suppl. 01) S173-S189
  • 4 Loffroy R, Favelier S, Pottecher P. et al. Endovascular management of visceral artery aneurysms: when to watch, when to intervene?. World J Radiol 2015; 7 (07) 143-148
  • 5 Madhusudhan KS, Venkatesh HA, Gamanagatti S, Garg P, Srivastava DN. Interventional radiology in the management of visceral artery pseudoaneurysms: a review of techniques and embolic materials. Korean J Radiol 2016; 17 (03) 351-363
  • 6 Jesinger RA, Thoreson AA, Lamba R. Abdominal and pelvic aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms: imaging review with clinical, radiologic, and treatment correlation. Radiographics 2013; 33 (03) E71-E96
  • 7 Gorsi U, Chaluvashetty S, Kalra N. et al. Percutaneous glue embolization as a primary treatment for visceral pseudoaneurysms. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2020; 29 (03) 170-176
  • 8 Vyas S, Khandelwal N, Gupta V. et al. Minimally invasive image-guided interventional management of hepatic artery pseudoaneurysms. Trop Gastroenterol 2014; 35 (04) 238-245
  • 9 Fankhauser GT, Stone WM, Naidu SG. et al. Mayo Vascular Research Center Consortium. The minimally invasive management of visceral artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2011; 53 (04) 966-970
  • 10 Kuno RC, Althaus SJ, Glickerman DJ. Direct percutaneous coil and ethanol embolization of a celiac artery pseudoaneurysm. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1995; 6 (03) 357-360
  • 11 Barbiero G, Battistel M, Susac A, Miotto D. Percutaneous thrombin embolization of a pancreatico-duodenal artery pseudoaneurysm after failing of the endovascular treatment. World J Radiol 2014; 6 (08) 629-635
  • 12 Yadav RR, Boruah DK, Bhattacharyya V. et al. Percutaneous direct needle puncture and transcatheter N-butyl cyanoacrylate injection techniques for the embolization of pseudoaneurysms and aneurysms of arteries supplying the hepato-pancreato-biliary system and gastrointestinal tract. J Clin Imaging Sci 2016; 6: 48
  • 13 Ward EV, Buckley O, Doody O, Govender P, Conlon K, Torreggiani WC. Percutaneous thrombin embolization of a ruptured peripancreatic pseudoaneurysm. Digestion 2007; 76 (3-4) 188-191
  • 14 Ghassemi A, Javit D, Dillon EH. Thrombin injection of a pancreaticoduodenal artery pseudoaneurysm after failed attempts at transcatheter embolization. J Vasc Surg 2006; 43 (03) 618-622
  • 15 Santiagu S, Gananadha S, Harrington TJ, Samra JS. Direct percutaneous puncture embolization of a peripancreatic pseudoaneurysm presenting with haemosuccus pancreaticus. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2008; 52 (04) 370-373
  • 16 Nicholson AA, Patel J, McPherson S, Shaw DR, Kessel D. Endovascular treatment of visceral aneurysms associated with pancreatitis and a suggested classification with therapeutic implications. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2006; 17 (08) 1279-1285
  • 17 Laganà D, Carrafiello G, Mangini M. et al. Multimodal approach to endovascular treatment of visceral artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms. Eur J Radiol 2006; 59 (01) 104-111
  • 18 Puri S, Nicholson AA, Breen DJ. Percutaneous thrombin injection for the treatment of a post-pancreatitis pseudoaneurysm. Eur Radiol 2003; 13 (Suppl. 04) L79-L82
  • 19 Gulati GS, Gulati MS, Makharia G. et al. Percutaneous glue embolization of a visceral artery pseudoaneurysm in a case of sickle cell anemia. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2006; 29 (04) 665-668
  • 20 Tulsyan N, Kashyap VS, Greenberg RK. et al. The endovascular management of visceral artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2007; 45 (02) 276-283, discussion 283
  • 21 Cope C, Zeit R. Coagulation of aneurysms by direct percutaneous thrombin injection. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986; 147 (02) 383-387