J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2022; 83(02): 133-136
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1721816
Original Article

Vascularized Pericranial Flap for Endonasal Anterior Skull Base Reconstruction

1   Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia, United States
,
Michael W. McDermott
2   Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States
3   Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco Medical Center at Parnassus, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Ivan H. El-Sayed
4   Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Introduction As the limits of advanced skull base malignancies that can be managed through an endoscopic endonasal approach continue to be expanded, the resultant anterior skull base defects are of increasing size and complexity. In the absence of nasoseptal or turbinate flaps, the vascularized pericranial flap has been employed at our institution with excellent results.

Objective The study aimed to review the outcomes of patients who underwent endonasal anterior craniofacial resection with anterior skull base reconstruction using a vascularized pericranial flap.

Design Retrospective chart review of patients treated by the University of California – San Francisco minimally invasive skull base service from the years 2011 to 2017. Average duration of follow-up was 16.4 months.

Setting This study was conducted at Academic tertiary referral center.

Participants A total of nine patients with advanced anterior cranial base malignancies were identified who were treated with a minimally invasive, endoscopic anterior craniofacial resection from the years 2011 to 2017. Due to the nature of the resection in these patients, nasoseptal flaps and inferior/middle turbinate flaps were unavailable or insufficient for anterior skull base defect repair. Each patient underwent reconstruction of the anterior cranial base defect using an anteriorly based pericranial flap harvested by bicoronal incision, and tunneled anteriorly to the nasal cavity through a frontoethmoidal incision.



Publication History

Received: 16 April 2020

Accepted: 08 September 2020

Article published online:
18 February 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Thorp BD, Sreenath SB, Ebert CS, Zanation AM. Endoscopic skull base reconstruction: a review and clinical case series of 152 vascularized flaps used for surgical skull base defects in the setting of intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak. Neurosurg Focus 2014; 37 (04) E4
  • 2 Patel MR, Taylor RJ, Hackman TG. et al. Beyond the nasoseptal flap: outcomes and pearls with secondary flaps in endoscopic endonasal skull base reconstruction. Laryngoscope 2014; 124 (04) 846-852
  • 3 Fortes FS, Carrau RL, Snyderman CH. et al. Transpterygoid transposition of a temporoparietal fascia flap: a new method for skull base reconstruction after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches. Laryngoscope 2007; 117 (06) 970-976
  • 4 Hadad G, Bassagasteguy L, Carrau RL. et al. A novel reconstructive technique after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches: vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap. Laryngoscope 2006; 116 (10) 1882-1886
  • 5 Zanation AM, Carrau RL, Snyderman CH. et al. Nasoseptal flap reconstruction of high flow intraoperative cerebral spinal fluid leaks during endoscopic skull base surgery. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2009; 23 (05) 518-521
  • 6 Zanation AM, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Kassam AB, Gardner PA, Prevedello DM. Minimally invasive endoscopic pericranial flap: a new method for endonasal skull base reconstruction. Laryngoscope 2009; 119 (01) 13-18
  • 7 Chaaban MR, Chaudhry A, Riley KO, Woodworth BA. Simultaneous pericranial and nasoseptal flap reconstruction of anterior skull base defects following endoscopic-assisted craniofacial resection. Laryngoscope 2013; 123 (10) 2383-2386