Download PDF
Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2015; 140(10): 756-760
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-102222
Fachwissen
Übersicht
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Verhaltensbasierte Prävention chronischer Krankheiten – wie kann sie gelingen?

Behavior-based prevention of chronic diseases
Ulrich John
1   Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Institut für Sozialmedizin und Prävention
2   Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung, Standort Greifswald
,
Sabina Ulbricht
1   Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Institut für Sozialmedizin und Prävention
2   Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung, Standort Greifswald
,
Jennis Freyer-Adam
1   Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Institut für Sozialmedizin und Prävention
2   Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung, Standort Greifswald
,
Christian Meyer
1   Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Institut für Sozialmedizin und Prävention
2   Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung, Standort Greifswald
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
13 May 2015 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund: Tabakrauchen, gesundheitsriskanter Alkoholkonsum, Übergewicht und Bewegungsmangel tragen zu mehr als 50 % von Herzinfarkten bei und bilden die häufigsten vermeidbaren Entstehungsfaktoren von Krebserkrankungen. Herz-Kreislauf- und Krebserkrankungen ließen sich verringern durch Prävention zusätzlich zur medizinischen Versorgung. Ziel dieses Beitrags ist die Elemente darzustellen, die Prävention ausmachen: Teilnehmerraten, Interventionsprogramme und Ergebnisse. Ergebnis-Kriterien umfassen die Intentionen zur Verhaltensänderung, die Verhaltensweisen selber, die gesamte Lebenszeit und die Zeit der Freiheit von chronischer Krankheit und Behinderung.

Ergebnisse: Der Stand internationaler Evidenz zeigt, dass Präventionsleistungen auf nationaler Ebene Umweltänderungen und direkte Interventionen umfassen sollten. Umweltänderungen beinhalten Reduktion der Attraktivität von und Schutz der Menschen vor gesundheitsriskanten Produkten. Direkte Intervention schließt besonders Beratungen ein. Diese Leistungen führen zu Reduktionen inzidenter Herz-Kreislauf- und Krebserkrankungen. Die Evidenz zur Wirksamkeit von Prävention stellen Verlaufsstudien, Modellrechnungen zu Risikofaktoren und Krankheiten sowie Kontrollgruppenstudien bereit. Alle drei Analyse-Ansätze belegen Erfolge der Prävention. Die Zusammenarbeit von Prävention und medizinischer Versorgung trägt zu Synergien bei.

Folgerung: Es besteht ein Handlungsdefizit. Bewährte oder als wirksam belegte Leistungen sollten in die Praxis umgesetzt, die Kooperation zwischen Prävention und medizinischer Versorgung gefördert werden.

Abstract

Background: Tobacco smoking, unhealthy alcohol drinking, overweight, and lack of physical activity add to more than 50 % of myocardial infarction and are the most prevalent avoidable factors related to cancer. Cardiovascular disease and cancer may be curbed by preventive action in addition to medical care. The aim of this contribution is to present the elements that constitute prevention: participation rates, intervention programs, and outcomes. Criteria for outcomes include intention to change behaviors, the behavior change, total lifetime and time of life free of chronic disease and disability.

Results: Evidence reveals that national preventive action should include legal action, environmental change, and direct health behavior change. The measures include reducing the appeal of and increasing the protection against risky products. Such provisions will reduce cardiovascular disease and cancer incidence. Direct behavior change includes counseling individuals in the general population. Evidence is provided by cohort, modeling, and controlled trial data. All three approaches revealed success of prevention. Collaboration of prevention and medical care will add to synergies.

Conclusion: A deficit of action exists. Effective preventive action should be implemented into practice, cooperation between prevention and medical care be supported.

Schlüsselwörter

Prävention - Umweltveränderung - Verhaltensintervention

Keywords

prevention - environmental changes - brief intervention
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 McGinnis JM, Williams-Russo P, Knickman JR. The case for more active policy attention to health promotion. Health Aff 2002; 21: 78-93
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 US Department of Health and Human Services. The health consequences of smoking – 50 years of progress. A report of the surgeon general. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2014
    Google Scholar
  • 3 O’Flaherty M, Buchan I, Capewell S. Contributions of treatment and lifestyle to declining CVD mortality: why have CVD mortality rates declined so much since the 1960 s?. Heart 2013; 99: 159-162
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Jones DS, Greene JA. The contributions of prevention and treatment to the decline in cardiovascular mortality: lessons from a forty-year debate. Health Aff 2012; 31: 2250-2258
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Farrelly MC, Pechacek TF, Thomas KY, Nelson D. The impact of tobacco control programs on adult smoking. Am J Public Health 2008; 98: 304-309
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Warner KE, Mendez D, Alshanqeety O. Tobacco control success versus demographic destiny: examining the causes of the low smoking prevalence in California. Am J Public Health 2008; 98: 268-269
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Österberg E, Karlsson T editors. Alcohol policies in the EU member states and Norway. A collection of country reports. Helsinki: STAKES; 2002
    Google Scholar
  • 8 World Health Organization. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2010. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Seitz HK, Bühringer G, Mann K. Grenzwerte für den Konsum alkoholischer Getränke: Empfehlungen des wissenschaftlichen Kuratoriums der DHS. In: Deutsche Hauptstelle für Suchtfragen e. V., Hrsg. Jahrbuch Sucht 08. Geesthacht: Neuland; 2008: 205-209
    Google Scholar
  • 10 World Health Organization. Obesity: Preventing and managing the global epidemic. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Vanhees L, De Sutter J, Gelada SN et al. Importance of characteristics and modalities of physical activity and exercise in defining the benefits to cardiovascular health within the general population: recommendations from the EACPR (Part I). Eur J Prevent Cardiol 2012; 19: 670-686
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Lloyd-Jones DM, Hong Y, Lebarthe D et al. Defining and setting national goals for cardiovascular health promotion and disease reduction: the American Heart Association’s strategic Impact Goal through 2020 and beyond. Circulation 2010; 121: 586-613
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ounpuu S et al. Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet 2004; 364: 937-952
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Colditz GA, Wei EK. Preventability of cancer: the relative contributions of biologic and social and physical environmental determinants of cancer mortality. Annu Rev Public Health 2012; 33: 137-156
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Parkin DM, Boyd L, Walker LC. The fraction of cancer attributable to lifestyle and environmental factors in the UK in 2010. Br J Cancer 2011; 105 (Suppl. 02) S77-S81
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Ford ES, Greenlund KJ, Hong Y. Ideal cardiovascular health and mortality from all causes and diseases of the circulatory system among adults in the United States. Circulation 2012; 125: 987-995
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Kones R. Is prevention a fantasy, or the future of medicine? A panoramic view of recent data, status, and direction in cardiovascular prevention. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis 2011; 5: 61-81
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Bellach BM, Knopf H, Thefeld W. Der Bundesgesundheitssurvey. Gesundheitswesen 1998; 60 (Suppl. 02) S59-S68
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Loef M, Walach H. The combined effects of healthy lifestyle behaviors on all cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med 2012; 55: 163-170
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Chakravarty EF, Hubert HB, Krishnan E et al. Lifestyle risk factors predict disability and death in healthy aging adults. Am J Med 2012; 125: 190-197
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Ezzati M, Hoorn SV, Rodgers A et al. Estimates of global and regional potential health gains from reducing multiple major risk factors. Lancet 2003; 362: 271-280
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Perk J, De Backer G, Gohlke H et al. European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012). Eur Heart J 2012; 33: 1635-1701
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Di Chiara A, Vanuzzo D. Does surveillance impact on cardiovascular prevention?. Eur Heart J 2009; 30: 1027-1029
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Jorgensen T, Capewell S, Prescott E et al. Population-level changes to promote cardiovascular health. Eur J Prevent Cardiol 2013; 20: 409-421
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 John U, Meyer C, Ulbricht S et al. Reduktion von Tabak- und Alkoholkonsum. In: Hoefert W, Klauer T, Hrsg. Krankheitsprävention in der Kontroverse. Lengerich: Pabst; 2014: 307-325
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Flay BR, Schure MB. The theory of triadic influence. In: Wagenaar AC, Burris S, (Hrsg.): Public Health Law Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2013: 169-191
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Petras H, Sloboda Z. An integrated prevention science model: a conceptual foundation for prevention research. In: Sloboda Z, Petras H, (Hrsg.) Defining Prevention Science. New York: Springer; 2014: 251-273
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Gallo V, Mackenbach JP, Ezzati M et al. Social inequalities and mortality in Europe – results from a large multi-national cohort. PLoS One 2012; 7: e39013
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Wilkinson R, Pickett K. The Spirit level: Why more equal societies almost always do better. London: Penguin; 2009
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Wagenaar AC, Burris S (eds). Public Health Law Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2013
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Webb TL, Sniehotta FF, Michie S. Using theories of behaviour change to inform interventions for addictive behaviours. Addiction 2010; 105: 1879-1892
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 John U, Meyer C, Rumpf H-J, Hapke U. Relation among stage of change, demographic characteristics, smoking history, and nicotine dependence in an adult German population. Prev Med 2003; 37: 368-374
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Meyer C, Ulbricht S, Gross B et al. Adoption, reach and effectiveness of computer-based, practitioner delivered and combined smoking interventions in general medical practices: A three-arm cluster randomized trial. Drug Alcohol Depend 2012; 121: 124-132
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Bischof G, Grothues J, Reinhardt S et al. Evaluation of a telephone-based stepped care intervention for alcohol-related disorders: a randomized controlled trial. Drug Alcohol Depend 2008; 93: 244-251
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Hettema J, Steele J, Miller WR. Motivational interviewing. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2005; 1: 91-111
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Goff Jr DC, Lloyd-Jones DM, Bennett G et al. 2013 ACC / AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk. Circulation 2014; 129, 25 (Suppl. 02) S49-S73
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Kurz-Milcke E, Gigerenzer G, Martignon L. Transparency in risk communication: graphical and analog tools. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2008; 1128: 18-28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health 1999; 89: 1322-1327
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Yusuf S, Rangarajan S, Teo K et al. Cardiovascular risk and events in 17 low-, middle-, and high-income countries. N Engl J Med 2014; 371: 818-827
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 World Health Organization. Scaling up action against noncommunicable diseases: How much will it cost?. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011
    Google Scholar