Z Gastroenterol 2016; 54(01): 47-57
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-108204
Übersicht
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Ultrasonography in acute diverticulitis – credit where credit is due[1]

An educational review on patterns, practice and differential diagnoses accompanying the statement of the Section Internal Medicine of the DEGUMSonografie der Divertikulitis – Ehre wem Ehre gebührt
B. Lembcke
Further Information

Publication History

06 August 2015

11 October 2015

Publication Date:
11 January 2016 (online)

Abstract

Diagnosing diverticulitis implies physical and laboratory examination, cross-sectional imaging (computed tomography [CT] or ultrasonography [US]), and a classification of the type of diverticular disease. This article illustrates the role of ultrasonography in view of the recently published Guidelines on diverticular disease of the Consensus Conference of the German Societies of Gastroenterology (DGVS) and Visceral Surgery (DGAV).

The focus is to foster both sensitivity for pictorial analysis and improving practical accomplishments of US in diverticulitis.

Based on the German classification of diverticular disease (CDD), characteristic features of each type of diverticulitis are presented and commented along with possible differential diagnoses. In the literature qualified US is equipotent to qualified CT. US is frequently effective for the diagnosis and unsurpassed resolution enables detailed imaging thereby allowing one to differentiate and stratify the relevant types of diverticular disease according to the new classification.

This educational review is a guided tour through the different facettes of diverticulitis on ultrasonography thereby expanding and multiplying individual competence to more users. With expert performance, US is in the pole position for diagnosing diverticulitis, however, this does come with the price of responsibility and requires transfer of advanced standards and performance in the broad.

Zusammenfassung

Die Leitlinien-konforme Diagnose einer Divertikulitis erfordert eine körperliche Untersuchung, Laboranalysen, ein Schnittbildverfahren (Ultraschall [US] oder Computertomografie [CT]) sowie eine Klassifikation des Divertikulitis-Typs. Diese Arbeit veranschaulicht die Rolle der Sonografie im Kontext der kürzlich veröffentlichten gemeinsamen Leitlinie zur Divertikulitis/Divertikelkrankheit der Deutschen Gesellschaften für Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten (DGVS) sowie für Allgemein- und Viszeral-Chirurgie (DGAV). Kernpunkte dabei sind eine Schärfung der Bildanalyse und die optimierte Durchführung der Ultraschalluntersuchung bei der Divertikulitis. Basierend auf der neuen Klassifikation der Divertikelkrankheit (CDD) werden charakteristische Merkmale der Divertikulitis-Typen vorgestellt und kommentiert, wichtige Differenzialdiagnosen eingeschlossen. Die Literatur weist qualifizierten US als gleichwertig zum qualifizierten CT aus. Die Sonografie ist häufig diagnostisch ausreichend; ihre unübertroffene Auflösung erlaubt eine detaillierte Beurteilung und ermöglicht eine Stratifizierung der einzelnen Typen der Divertikelerkrankung entsprechend der CDD. Die hier vorgestellten US-Befunde veranschaulichen die verschiedenen Facetten der Divertikulitis im US und dienen damit der Vertiefung und Verbreitung der individuellen Kompetenz. In der Hand des Geübten ist US die Methode der Wahl in der Divertikulitis-Diagnostik. Das impliziert Verantwortung für den Befund, aber auch für die Weitergabe eines solchen Standards und qualifizierter Durchführung der Untersuchung in die Breite.

1 Ultrasound Obtains Pole Position for Clinical Imaging in Acute Diverticulitis. Statement of the Section Internal Medicine of the DEGUM. Ultraschall in Med. 2015; 36: 191 – 194


 
  • References

  • 1 Federmann G. Sonografie in der Diagnostik der akuten Colondivertikulitis. Chirurg 1989; 60: 43-46
  • 2 Wilson ASR, Toi A. The value of sonography in the diagnosis of acute diverticulitis of the colon. Am J Roentgenol 1990; 154: 1199-1202
  • 3 Schwerk WB, Schwarz S, Rothmund M. Sonography in acute colonic diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35: 1077-1084
  • 4 Pradel JA, Adell JF, Taourel P et al. Acute colonic diverticulitis: prospective comparative evaluation with US and CT. Radiology 1997; 205: 503-512
  • 5 Kori T, Nemoto M, Maeda M et al. Sonographic features of acute colonic diverticulitis: the “dome sign”. J Clin Ultrasound 2000; 28: 340-346
  • 6 Hollerweger A, Macheiner P, Rettenbacher T et al. Colonic diverticulitis: diagnostic value and appearance of inflamed diverticula – sonographic evaluation. Eur Radiol 2001; 11: 1956-1963
  • 7 Ripolles T, Agramunt M, Martinez MJ et al. The role of ultrasound in the diagnosis, management and evolution prognosis of acute left-sided colonic diverticulitis: a review of 208 patients. Eur Radiol 2003; 13: 2587-2595
  • 8 Farag Soliman M, Wüstner M, Sturm J et al. Primärdiagnostik der akuten Sigmadivertikulitis. Sonografie versus Computertomografie, eine prospektive Studie. Ultraschall in Med 2004; 25: 342-347
  • 9 Liljegren G, Chabok A, Wickbom M et al. Acute colonic diverticulitis: a systematic review of diagnostic accuracy. Colorectal Dis 2007; 9: 480-488
  • 10 Seitz K. Sonografische Divertikulitisdiagnostik: Der mühsame Weg zur Akzeptanz. Ultraschall in Med 2004; 25: 335-336
  • 11 Mauch M, Seitz K. Divertikulitis. Ultraschall in Med 2007; 28: 346-371
  • 12 Lembcke B. Diagnosis, differential diagnoses, and classification of diverticular disease. Viszeralmedizin 2015; 31: 95-102
  • 13 Lembcke B, Strobel D, Dirks K et al. Ultrasound obtains pole position for clinical imaging in acute diverticulitis. Statement of the Section Internal Medicine of the DEGUM. Ultraschall in Med 2015; 36: 191-194
  • 14 Leifeld L, Germer CT, Böhm S et al. S2k-Leitlinie Divertikelkrankheit. Divertikulitis. S2k Guidelines Diverticular Disease/Diverticulitis. Z Gastroenterol 2014; 52: 663-710
  • 15 Puylaert JBCM. Ultrasound of colon diverticulitis. Dig Dis 2012; 30: 56-59
  • 16 Holmer C, Lehmann KS, Engelmann S et al. Microscopic findings in sigmoid diverticulitis – changes after conservative therapy. J Gastrointest Surg 2010; 14: 812-817
  • 17 Maxwell Telling WH, Gruner OC. Acquired diverticula, diverticulitis, and peridiverticulitis of the large intestine. Br J Surg 1916; 4: 468-530
  • 18 Imperiali G, Terpin MM, Meucci G et al. Segmental colitis associated with diverticula: a 7-year follow-up study. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 610-612
  • 19 Ricciardi R, Roberts PL, Read TE et al. Cyclical increase in diverticulitis during the summer months. Arch Surg 2011; 146: 319-323
  • 20 Maguire LH, Song M, Strate LE et al. Higher serum levels of vitamin d are associated with a reduced risk of diverticulitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11: 1631-1635
  • 21 Ludeman L, Shepherd NA. What is diverticular colitis?. Pathology 2002; 34: 568-572
  • 22 Tursi A. Segmental colitis associated with diverticulosis: complication of diverticular disease or autonomous entity?. Dig Dis Sci 2011; 56: 27-34
  • 23 Feakins RM. Inflammatory bowel disease biopsies: updated British Society of Gastroenterology reporting guidelines. J Clin Pathol 2013; 66: 1005-1026
  • 24 Anaya DA, Flum DR. Risk of emergency colectomy and colostomy in patients with diverticular disease. Arch Surg 2005; 140: 681-685
  • 25 Shaikh S, Krukowski ZH. Outcome of a conservative policy for managing acute sigloid diverticulitis. Br J Surg 2007; 94: 876-879
  • 26 Flaherty MJ, Lie JT, Haggitt RC. Mesenteric inflammatory veno-occlusive disease. A seldom recognized cause of intestinal ischemia. Am J Surg Pathol 1994; 18: 779-784
  • 27 Lavu K, Minocha A. Mesenteric inflammatory veno-occlusive disorder: a rare entity mimicking inflammatory bowel disorder. Gastroenterology 2002; 125: 236-239
  • 28 Kelly JK. Polypoid prolapsing mucosal folds in diverticular disease. Am J Surg Pathol 1991; 15: 871-878
  • 29 Tendler DA, Aboudola S, Zacks JF et al. Prolapsing mucosal polyps: an underrecognized form of colonic polyp – a clinicopathological study of 15 cases. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 370-376
  • 30 Lee YS. Diverticular disease of the large bowel in Singapore. An autopsy survey. Dis Colon Rectum 1986; 29: 330-335
  • 31 Oudenhoven LFIJ, Puylaert JBCM, Koumans RKJ. Right colonic diverticulitis: US and CT findings – new insights about frequency and natural history. Radiology 1998; 208: 611-618
  • 32 Ambrosetti P, Becker C, Terrier F. Colonic diverticulitis: impact of imaging on surgical management – a prospective study of 542 patients. Eur Radiol 2002; 12: 1145-1149
  • 33 Kircher MF, Rhea JT, Kihiczak D et al. Frequency, sensitivity, and specificity of individual signs of diverticulitis on thin-section helical CT with colonic contrast material: experience with 312 cases. Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178: 1313-1318
  • 34 Gielens MPM, Mulder IM, van der Harst E et al. Preoperative staging of perforated diverticulitis by computed tomography scanning. Tech Coloproctol 2012; 16: 363-368
  • 35 Ritz JP, Lehmann KS, Loddenkemper C et al. Preoperative CT staging in sigmoid diverticulitis – does it correlate with intraoperative and histological findings?. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2010; 395: 1009-1015