Endoscope-controlled Access to Thalamic Tumors using Tubular Brain Retractor: An Alternative Approach to Microscopic Excision

Abstract

Background Surgery for thalamic lesions has been considered challenging due to their deep-seated location. Endoscopic excision of deep-seated brain tumors using tubular retractor has been shown to be safe and effective in prior studies; however, there are limited reports regarding its use for thalamic tumors. We present our experience of endoscope-controlled resection of thalamic tumors using a tubular retractor.

Material and Methods This was a prospective observational case series done at a tertiary center specialized for endoscopic neurosurgery during the period from 2010 to 2019. Surgeries were performed under the endoscopic control using a silicon tubular retractor. Lesions were approached transcortically or trans-sulcally. Data were collected for the extent of resection, amount of blood loss, operative time, need for conversion to microscopy, and complications.

Results Twenty-one patients of thalamic masses of 14- to 60-year age underwent the surgeries. Pathologies ranged from grade I to IV gliomas. Gross total and near-total resection could be done in 42.85% of cases for each group. The average blood loss and operative time were164.04 ± 83.63 mL and 157.14 ± 28.70 minutes, respectively. Complications included a small brain contusion, two transient hemipareses, and one transient speech deficit.

Conclusion Endoscopic excision of thalamic tumors using a tubular retractor was found to be a safe and effective alternative to microscopic resection.

Keywords

endoscopic surgical procedure - endoscopy - glioma - thalamic disease

Publication History

Received: 19 January 2020

Accepted: 08 June 2020

Article published online:
18 June 2021

• References

• 1 Moshel YA, Link MJ, Kelly PJ. Stereotactic volumetric resection of thalamic pilocytic astrocytomas. Neurosurgery 2007; 61 (01) 66-75 , discussion 75
• 2 Skrap M, Melatini A, Strukelj S. The stereotactic volumetric information: its role in two-step resection of brainstem and thalamic giant tumor. Report of three cases and technical note. Surg Neurol 1999; 52 (05) 515-523
• 3 Carrabba G, Bertani G, Cogiamanian F. et al. Role of intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring in the resection of thalamic astrocytomas. World Neurosurg 2016; 94: 50-56
• 4 Sai Kiran NA, Thakar S, Dadlani R. et al. Surgical management of thalamic gliomas: case selection, technical considerations, and review of literature. Neurosurg Rev 2013; 36 (03) 383-393
• 5 Zheng X, Xu X, Zhang H. et al. A preliminary experience with use of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in thalamic glioma surgery: a case series of 38 patients. World Neurosurg 2016; 89: 434-441
• 6 Steiger HJ, Götz C, Schmid-Elsaesser R, Stummer W. Thalamic astrocytomas: surgical anatomy and results of a pilot series using maximum microsurgical removal. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2000; 142 (12) 1327-1336 , discussion 1336–1337
• 7 Ritz R, Feigl GC, Schuhmann MU. et al. Use of 5-ALA fluorescence guided endoscopic biopsy of a deep-seated primary malignant brain tumor. J Neurosurg 2011; 114 (05) 1410-1413
• 8 Roth J, Ram Z, Constantini S. Endoscopic considerations treating hydrocephalus caused by basal ganglia and large thalamic tumors. Surg Neurol Int 2015; 6: 56
• 9 Selvapandian S. Endoscopic management of thalamic gliomas. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2006; 49 (04) 194-196
• 10 Yurtseven T, Erşahin Y, Demirtaş E, Mutluer S. Neuroendoscopic biopsy for intraventricular tumors. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2003; 46 (05) 293-299
• 11 Ratre S, Yadav YR, Parihar VS, Kher Y. microendoscopic removal of deep-seated brain tumors using tubular retraction system. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2016; 77 (04) 312-320
• 12 Brokinkel B, Yavuz M, Warneke N. et al. Endoscopic management of a low-grade thalamic glioma: a safe alternative to open microsurgery?. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2017; 159 (07) 1237-1240
• 13 Thiex R, Hans FJ, Krings T, Sellhaus B, Gilsbach JM. Technical pitfalls in a porcine brain retraction model. The impact of brain spatula on the retracted brain tissue in a porcine model: a feasibility study and its technical pitfalls. Neuroradiology 2005; 47 (10) 765-773
• 14 Rosenørn J, Diemer N. The risk of cerebral damage during graded brain retractor pressure in the rat. J Neurosurg 1985; 63 (04) 608-611
• 15 Yadav YR, Parihar V, Pande S, Namdev H. Endoscopic management of colloid cysts. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2014; 75 (05) 376-380
• 16 Yadav YR, Yadav S, Sherekar S, Parihar V. A new minimally invasive tubular brain retractor system for surgery of deep intracerebral hematoma. Neurol India 2011; 59 (01) 74-77
• 17 Beks JW, Bouma GJ, Journée HL. Tumours of the thalamic region. A retrospective study of 27 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1987; 85 (3-4): 125-127
• 18 Bernstein M, Hoffman HJ, Halliday WC, Hendrick EB, Humphreys RP. Thalamic tumors in children. Long-term follow-up and treatment guidelines. J Neurosurg 1984; 61 (04) 649-656
• 19 Broadway SJ, Ogg RJ, Scoggins MA, Sanford R, Patay Z, Boop FA. Surgical management of tumors producing the thalamopeduncular syndrome of childhood. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2011; 7 (06) 589-595
• 20 Baroncini M, Vinchon M, Minéo J-F, Pichon F, Francke J-P, Dhellemmes P. Surgical resection of thalamic tumors in children: approaches and clinical results. Childs Nerv Syst 2007; 23 (07) 753-760
• 21 Cinalli G, Aguirre DT, Mirone G. et al. Surgical treatment of thalamic tumors in children. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2018; 21 (03) 247-257
• 22 Cao L, Li C, Zhang Y, Gui S. Surgical resection of unilateral thalamic tumors in adults: approaches and outcomes. BMC Neurol 2015; 15: 229