Open Access
CC BY 4.0 · Aorta (Stamford) 2021; 09(02): 067-075
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1725074
Original Research Article

Preservation of the Aortic Root During Type A Aortic Dissection Surgery: An Effective Strategy?

1   Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital of Angers, Angers, France
,
Jihed Laribi
1   Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital of Angers, Angers, France
,
Frédéric Pinaud
1   Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital of Angers, Angers, France
,
Patrice Binuani
1   Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital of Angers, Angers, France
,
Serge Willoteaux
2   Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Angers, Angers, France
,
Christophe Baufreton*
1   Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital of Angers, Angers, France
3   Mitovasc Institute INSERM U1083 UMR-CNRS 6214, University Hospital of Angers, Angers, France
,
Olivier Fouquet*
1   Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital of Angers, Angers, France
3   Mitovasc Institute INSERM U1083 UMR-CNRS 6214, University Hospital of Angers, Angers, France
› Author Affiliations

Funding None.
Preview

Abstract

Background Management of the aortic root during acute Type A aortic dissection (TAAD) repair remains controversial in term of long-term evolution and reoperation. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term outcomes of the aortic root after conservative management during primary surgery.

Methods One hundred sixty-four consecutive patients were included in this monocentric retrospective study. The primary endpoint was reoperation on the aortic root during long-term follow-up. Forty-six patients had aortic root replacement (ARR) and 118 had supracoronary aortic replacement (SCR). The 10-year survival, occurrence of significant aortic regurgitation, and radiologic aortic root dilatation in each group were assessed during follow-up.

Results Patients from ARR group were younger than those from SCR group (p < 0.0001). Median follow-ups of ARR group and SCR group are 4.4 (interquartile range [IR]: 2.6–8.3) and 6.15 (IR: 2.8–10.53) years, respectively. Reoperation of the aortic root during long-term follow-up was similar in both groups (ARR group: 5.1%, SCR group: 3.3%, p = 0.636). The 10-year survivals of ARR and SCR groups were 64.8 ± 12.3% and 46.3 ± 5.8% (p = 0.012), respectively. Long-term significant aortic regurgitation occurred in one patient (1.7%) and seven patients (7.6%) of the ARR and SCR groups (p = 0.176), respectively. Radiologic aortic root diameters in the SCR group were similar between postoperative period and follow-up studies (p = 0.58). Reoperation on the distal aorta (p = 0.012) and patent radiologic false lumen of the descending aorta (p = 0.043) were independent risk factors of late death.

Conclusion SCR is an effective technique for primary TAAD surgery and does not increase the rate of late reoperation on the aortic root.

* The last two authors contributed equally to the study.




Publication History

Received: 28 February 2020

Accepted: 02 October 2020

Article published online:
07 October 2021

© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA