Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings and Clinical Outcomes in the Early Postoperative Period after Full Endoscopic Diskectomy for Lumbar Disk Herniation

Abstract

Introduction This prospective case-control study aimed to establish the normal spectrum of early magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in patients whose symptoms resolve after full endoscopic diskectomy (FED). We examined the changes in postoperative MRI findings and their relation to early clinical symptoms.

Methods In total, 33 patients underwent FED under local anesthesia. Clinical assessments and MRI examinations were performed preoperatively and immediately (within 1 week) and late (at 3 and 12 months) postoperatively. Residual disk bulging after surgery was classified into four grades compared with preoperative MRI findings: none (grade A), <25% (grade B), 25–75% (grade C), and >75% (grade D).

Results MRI at postoperative week 1 showed grade B residual disk bulging in 9 patients, grade C residual disk bulging in 8 patients, and grade D residual disk bulging in 16 patients. Improvement was seen at postoperative month 3 (grade A in 18 patients, grade B in 10 patients, and grade C in 5 patients) and at postoperative month 12 (grade A in 29 patients, grade B in 3 patients, and grade C in 1 patient). Visual analog scale scores and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores showed significant differences at 1 week, 3 months, and 12 months after surgery.

Conclusion Postoperative MRI findings within 1 week of FED showed grade C or D residual disk material in 24 of 33 patients (73%). Clinical symptoms improved in the early postoperative period, even though residual disk bulging was present. Persisting residual bulging in the early stage following surgery may not correlate with clinical symptoms.

Keywords

full endoscopic diskectomy - magnetic resonance imaging - lumbar disk herniation - low back pain - early clinical features

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 02. Juli 2020

Angenommen: 09. November 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
24. Mai 2021

• References

• 1 Boden SD, Davis DO, Dina TS. et al. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging performed after successful lumbar disk surgery: prospective study. Radiology 1992; 182 (01) 59-64
• 2 Annertz M, Jönsson B, Strömqvist B, Holtås S. Serial MRI in the early postoperative period after lumbar discectomy. Neuroradiology 1995; 37 (03) 177-182
• 3 Van Goethem JW, Van de Kelft E, Biltjes IG. et al. MRI after successful lumbar discectomy. Neuroradiology 1996; 38 (Suppl. 01) S90-S96
• 4 Floris R, Spallone A, Aref TY. et al. Early postoperative MRI findings following surgery for herniated lumbar disc. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1997; 139 (03) 169-175
• 5 Bommireddy R, Kamat A, Smith ET. et al. Magnetic resonance image findings in the early post-operative period after anterior cervical discectomy. Eur Spine J 2007; 16 (01) 27-31
• 6 Sahlstrand T, Lönntoft M. A prospective study of preoperative and postoperative sequential magnetic resonance imaging and early clinical outcome in automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy. J Spinal Disord 1999; 12 (05) 368-374
• 7 Wang Y, Luo G, Wang J, Zhu M, Li C, Teng H. Early postoperative magnetic resonance imaging findings after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and their correlations with clinical outcomes. World Neurosurg 2018; 111: e241-e249
• 8 Ahn Y, Jeong TS, Lim T, Jeon JY. Grading system for migrated lumbar disc herniation on sagittal magnetic resonance imaging: an agreement study. Neuroradiology 2018; 60 (01) 101-107
• 9 Park CH, Park ES, Lee SH. et al. Risk factors for early recurrence after transforaminal endoscopic lumbar disc decompression. Pain Physician 2019; 22 (02) E133-E138
• 10 Henmi T, Terai T, Hibino N. et al. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy utilizing ventral epiduroscopic observation technique and foraminoplasty for transligamentous extruded nucleus pulposus: technical note. J Neurosurg Spine 2016; 24 (02) 275-280
• 11 Yeung AT. The evolution of percutaneous spinal endoscopy and discectomy: state of the art. Mt Sinai J Med 2000; 67 (04) 327-332
• 12 Yeung AT, Tsou PM. Posterolateral endoscopic excision for lumbar disc herniation: Surgical technique, outcome, and complications in 307 consecutive cases. Spine 2002; 27 (07) 722-731
• 13 Yeung AT, Yeung CA. Minimally invasive techniques for the management of lumbar disc herniation. Orthop Clin North Am 2007; 38 (03) 363-372 , abstract vi
• 14 Dezawa A. Office-based surgery for the percutaneous endoscopic laminectomy and discectomy. Orthop Surg Traumatol 2016; 59 (03) 254-259
• 15 Lee DY, Lee SH. Learning curve for percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2008; 48 (09) 383-388 , discussion 388–389
• 16 Bender M, Gramsch C, Herrmann L. et al. Implementation of transforaminal endoscopic lumbar sequesterectomy on a German university hospital setting: a long and rocky road. J Neurol Surg A 2020; 81: 28-32
• 17 Yaday YR, Lucano A, Ratre S, Parihar VS. Practical aspects and avoidance of complications in microendoscopic spine surgeries: a review. J Neurol Surg A 2019; 80: 291-301
• 18 Hsu HT, Chang SJ, Yang SS, Chai CL. Learning curve of full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy. Eur Spine J 2013; 22 (04) 727-733
• 19 Sairyo K, Matsuura T, Higashino K. et al. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for athletes. J Spine 2013; S5: 006
• 20 Wu XB, Fan GX, Gu X. et al. Learning curves of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy in transforaminal approach at the L4/5 and L5/S1 levels: a comparative study. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 2016; 17 (07) 553-560
• 21 Ross JS, Masaryk TJ, Modic MT, Bohlman H, Delamater R, Wilber G. Lumbar spine: postoperative assessment with surface-coil MR imaging. Radiology 1987; 164 (03) 851-860
• 22 Kotilainen E, Alanen A, Erkintalo M, Valtonen S, Kormano M. Magnetic resonance image changes and clinical outcome after microdiscectomy or nucleotomy for ruptured disc. Surg Neurol 1994; 41 (06) 432-440
• 23 Crocker M, Jones TL, Rich P, Bell BA, Papadopoulos MC. The clinical value of early postoperative MRI after lumbar spine surgery. Br J Neurosurg 2010; 24 (01) 46-50
• 24 Autio RA, Karppinen J, Niinimäki J. et al. Determinants of spontaneous resorption of intervertebral disc herniations. Spine 2006; 31 (11) 1247-1252
• 25 Kobayashi S, Meir A, Kokubo Y. et al. Ultrastructural analysis on lumbar disc herniation using surgical specimens: role of neovascularization and macrophages in hernias. Spine 2009; 34 (07) 655-662
• 26 Yoshida M, Nakamura T, Sei A, Kikuchi T, Takagi K, Matsukawa A. Intervertebral disc cells produce tumor necrosis factor alpha, interleukin-1beta, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 immediately after herniation: an experimental study using a new hernia model. Spine 2005; 30 (01) 55-61
• 27 Cunha C, Silva AJ, Pereira P, Vaz R, Gonçalves RM, Barbosa MA. The inflammatory response in the regression of lumbar disc herniation. Arthritis Res Ther 2018; 20 (01) 251
• 28 Lee SH, Kang BU, Ahn Y. et al. Operative failure of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: a radiologic analysis of 55 cases. Spine 2006; 31 (10) E285-E290
• 29 Choi KC, Lee JH, Kim JS. et al. Unsuccessful percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: a single-center experience of 10,228 cases. Neurosurgery 2015; 76 (04) 372-380 , discussion 380–381, quiz 381
• 30 Heo JH, Kim CH, Chung CK. et al. Quantity of disc removal and radiological outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy. Pain Physician 2017; 20 (05) E737-E746
• 31 Baek J, Yang SH, Kim CH. et al. Postoperative longitudinal outcomes in patients with residual disc fragments after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy. Pain Physician 2018; 21 (04) E457-E466