CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian Journal of Neurotrauma 2022; 19(01): 040-043
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1727294
Case Report

Neuropsychological and Linguistic Outcomes after Gunshot Injury to Cerebellum: A Case Report

Mohammed Afsar
1   Department of Clinical Psychology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro-Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
,
Kamasetru Jeevendrakumar Darshini
2   Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro-Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
,
Dhaval Shukla
3   Department of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro-Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
,
Valiyaparambath Vandana
2   Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro-Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
,
Jamuna Rajeswaran
1   Department of Clinical Psychology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro-Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Craniocerebral gunshot injuries (CGIs) are highly fatal and mostly seen in the military settings. CGIs to the posterior cortical regions and cerebellum in civilian population are uncommon. Cerebellum once thought to be mediating the motor and vestibular functions is increasingly seen as an important structure for human cognition and affect. We present a case of a 53-year-old police inspector who sustained a gunshot injury in the suboccipital region with resulting damage to predominantly left cerebellum and right occipital lobe. Patient presented with complaints of neck pain, reduced clarity of speech, and mild forgetfulness for day-to-day affairs after 7 months of injury. A comprehensive neuropsychological assessment revealed impairments in motor speed, processing speed, sustained attention, executive functions (verbal fluency, working memory), and encoding component of memory functions. The speech–language assessment revealed mild dysarthria and mild word finding difficulties. His profile with mild to moderate deficits in neuropsychological and speech language functioning was partly congruent with the cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome or Schmahmann’s syndrome. The spontaneous recovery and extent of damage to cerebellum may explain the milder form of the syndrome. The case highlights the need to routinely screen for cognitive-affective disturbances in patients with traumatic lesions to cerebellum.



Publication History

Article published online:
15 April 2021

© 2021. Neurotrauma Society of India. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Shaffrey ME, Polin RS, Phillips CD, Germanson T, Shaffrey CI, Jane JA. Classification of civilian craniocerebral gunshot wounds: a multivariate analysis predictive of mortality. J Neurotrauma 1992; 9 (Suppl. 01) S279-S285
  • 2 Joseph B, Aziz H, Pandit V. et al Improving survival rates after civilian gunshot wounds to the brain. J Am Coll Surg 2014; 218 (01) 58-65
  • 3 Dikmen SS, Corrigan JD, Levin HS, Machamer J, Stiers W, Weisskopf MG. Cognitive outcome following traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2009; 24 (06) 430-438
  • 4 Kapur N, Hutchinson P, Berry E, Hawkins K, Llewellyn D, Wilson B. Executive dysfunction in a case of transoral-frontal self-inflicted gunshot injury. Brain Inj 2009; 23 (12) 985-989
  • 5 Seniow J, Polanowska K, Mandat T, Laudanski K. The cognitive impairments due to the occipito-parietal brain injury after gunshot. A successful neurorehabiliation case study. Brain Inj 2003; 17 (08) 701-713
  • 6 de Oliveira-Souza R, Moll J, Moll FT, de Oliveira DL. Executive amnesia in a patient with pre-frontal damage due to a gunshot wound. Neurocase 2001; 7 (05) 383-389
  • 7 Schmahmann JD, Sherman JC. The cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome. Brain 1998; 121 (Pt 4) 561-579
  • 8 Rao SL, Subbakrishna DK, Gopukumar K. NIMHANS Neuropsychology Battery Bangalore, India: National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences; 2004
  • 9 Enderby P. Frenchay Dysarthria Assessment. California: College-Hill Press; 1983
  • 10 Karanth P. Western Aphasia Battery in Hindi. Mysore, India: ICMR Project, All India Institute of Speech and Hearing; 1980
  • 11 Baillieux H, De Smet HJ, Paquier PF, De Deyn PP, Mariën P. Cerebellar neurocognition: insights into the bottom of the brain. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2008; 110 (08) 763-773
  • 12 Appollonio IM, Grafman J, Schwartz V, Massaquoi S, Hallett M. Memory in patients with cerebellar degeneration. Neurology 1993; 43 (08) 1536-1544
  • 13 Schmahmann JD. The cerebellum and cognition. Neurosci Lett 2019; 688: 62-75
  • 14 Manto M, Mariën P. Schmahmann’s syndrome - identification of the third cornerstone of clinical ataxiology. Cerebellum Ataxias 2015; 2 (01) 2
  • 15 Arasanz CP, Staines WR, Roy EA, Schweizer TA. The cerebellum and its role in word generation: a cTBS study. Cortex 2012; 48 (06) 718-724