J Knee Surg 2022; 35(14): 1563-1570
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1728785
Original Article

Is Valgus Cut Angle Based on Radiographic Measurements in Total Knee Arthroplasty Really Inaccurate? A Comparison of Two- and Three-Dimensional Measurements

LiMing Liu*
1   Center for Joint Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
,
Kai Lei*
1   Center for Joint Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
,
Xin Chen
1   Center for Joint Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
,
HuaQuan Fan
1   Center for Joint Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
,
Liu Yang
1   Center for Joint Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
,
Lin Guo
1   Center for Joint Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
› Author Affiliations
Funding This study was funded by National Key R&D Program of China (no.: 2016YFB1101404) and Guangdong Provincial Key R&D Program (no.: 2018B090906003).

Abstract

Radiographs are widely used to measure distal femoral valgus cut angle (VCA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but its accuracy is controversial. This study used three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction models to verify the accuracy of VCA measurements on radiographs, and explore the correlation of VCA with hip–knee–ankle (HKA) angle and lateral femoral bowing angle (FBA). A total of 444 osteoarthritis knees of 444 patients from August 2016 to June 2018 was included retrospectively. On radiographs, two-dimensional VCA (VCA-2D) was measured between the femoral mechanical axis and the distal femoral anatomical axis, and HKA was measured between the femoral mechanical axis and the tibial mechanical axis. On the coronal projection of computed tomography 3D models, the anatomical landmarks used for VCA-3D measurements were the same as those on the radiographs, FBA was measured between the proximal and distal femoral anatomical axis. The distributions of VCA-2D and VCA-3D were evaluated by means and variances. The correlation between HKA and VCA and between FBA and VCA was explored. There was a statistical difference between VCA-2D and VCA-3D (p < 0.001), but the deviation was very small (0.15 ± 0.69 degrees), 83.3% of the deviations were less than 1 degree. VCA would increase both in 2D and 3D with increasing of FBA and HKA varus. There was no statistically significant difference between VCA-2D and VCA-3D in patients with moderate varus knees (0–8 degrees of varus) and mild bowing femurs (FBA <5 degrees). Overall, the deviation caused by using radiography to measure VCA was negligible. VCA measurements using radiographs were accurate in patients with moderate varus knees and mildly bowed femurs. This study reflects level of evidence III.

Ethical Approval

Ethical approval was obtained from the local ethical committee. All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.


* These authors contributed to the work equally and should be regarded as co–first authors.




Publication History

Received: 16 July 2020

Accepted: 12 March 2021

Article published online:
29 April 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • Reference

  • 1 Liu T, Wang CY, Xiao JL. et al. Three-dimensional reconstruction method for measuring the knee valgus angle of the femur in northern Chinese adults. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 2014; 15 (08) 720-726
  • 2 Nam D, Vajapey S, Haynes JA, Barrack RL, Nunley RM. Does use of a variable distal femur resection angle improve radiographic alignment in primary total knee arthroplasty?. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31 (9, suppl) 91-96
  • 3 Davis JA, Hogan C, Dayton M. Postoperative coronal alignment after total knee arthroplasty: does tailoring the femoral valgus cut angle really matter?. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30 (08) 1444-1448
  • 4 Sailhan F, Jacob L, Hamadouche M. Differences in limb alignment and femoral mechanical-anatomical angles using two dimension versus three dimension radiographic imaging. Int Orthop 2017; 41 (10) 2009-2016
  • 5 Andrews SN, Beeler DM, Parke EA, Nakasone CK, Stickley CD. Fixed distal femoral cut of 6° valgus in total knee arthroplasty: a radiographic review of 788 consecutive cases. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34 (04) 755-759
  • 6 Deakin AH, Basanagoudar PL, Nunag P, Johnston AT, Sarungi M. Natural distribution of the femoral mechanical-anatomical angle in an osteoarthritic population and its relevance to total knee arthroplasty. Knee 2012; 19 (02) 120-123
  • 7 Deakin AH, Sarungi M. A comparison of variable angle versus fixed angle distal femoral resection in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (06) 1133-1137
  • 8 Shi X, Li H, Zhou Z. et al. Individual valgus correction angle improves accuracy of postoperative limb alignment restoration after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25 (01) 277-283
  • 9 Shi X, Li H, Zhou Z, Shen B, Yang J, Pei F. Comparison of postoperative alignment using fixed vs individual valgus correction angle in primary total knee arthroplasty with lateral bowing femur. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31 (05) 976-983
  • 10 Lampart M, Behrend H, Moser LB, Hirschmann MT. Due to great variability fixed HKS angle for alignment of the distal cut leads to a significant error in coronal TKA orientation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2019; 27 (05) 1434-1441
  • 11 Meijer MF, Boerboom AL, Bulstra SK, Reininga IHF, Stevens M. Do CAS measurements correlate with EOS 3D alignment measurements in primary TKA?. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25 (09) 2894-2903
  • 12 Lasam MP, Lee KJ, Chang CB, Kang YG, Kim TK. Femoral lateral bowing and varus condylar orientation are prevalent and affect axial alignment of TKA in Koreans. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471 (05) 1472-1483
  • 13 Kim JM, Hong SH, Kim JM. et al. Femoral shaft bowing in the coronal plane has more significant effect on the coronal alignment of TKA than proximal or distal variations of femoral shape. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23 (07) 1936-1942
  • 14 Guenoun B, Zadegan F, Aim F, Hannouche D, Nizard R. Reliability of a new method for lower-extremity measurements based on stereoradiographic three-dimensional reconstruction. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2012; 98 (05) 506-513
  • 15 Ueyama H, Minoda Y, Sugama R. et al. Two-dimensional measurement misidentifies alignment outliers in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of two- and three-dimensional measurements. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2019; 27 (05) 1497-1503
  • 16 Okamoto S, Mizu-uchi H, Okazaki K. et al. Two-dimensional planning can result in internal rotation of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24 (01) 229-235
  • 17 Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 1957; 16 (04) 494-502
  • 18 Price AJ, Alvand A, Troelsen A. et al. Knee replacement. Lancet 2018; 392 (10158): 1672-1682
  • 19 Maderbacher G, Matussek J, Greimel F. et al. Lower limb malrotation is regularly present in long-leg radiographs resulting in significant measurement errors. J Knee Surg 2021; 34 (04) 108-114
  • 20 Maderbacher G, Schaumburger J, Baier C. et al. Predicting knee rotation by the projection overlap of the proximal fibula and tibia in long-leg radiographs. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014; 22 (12) 2982-2988
  • 21 Lohman M, Tallroth K, Kettunen JA, Remes V. Changing from analog to digital images: does it affect the accuracy of alignment measurements of the lower extremity?. Acta Orthop 2011; 82 (03) 351-355
  • 22 Sailer J, Scharitzer M, Peloschek P, Giurea A, Imhof H, Grampp S. Quantification of axial alignment of the lower extremity on conventional and digital total leg radiographs. Eur Radiol 2005; 15 (01) 170-173
  • 23 Moreland JR, Bassett LW, Hanker GJ. Radiographic analysis of the axial alignment of the lower extremity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987; 69 (05) 745-749
  • 24 Oswald MH, Jakob RP, Schneider E, Hoogewoud HM. Radiological analysis of normal axial alignment of femur and tibia in view of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1993; 8 (04) 419-426
  • 25 Mullaji AB, Marawar SV, Mittal V. A comparison of coronal plane axial femoral relationships in Asian patients with varus osteoarthritic knees and healthy knees. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24 (06) 861-867
  • 26 Nagamine R, Miura H, Bravo CV. et al. Anatomic variations should be considered in total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 2000; 5 (03) 232-237
  • 27 Boisgard S, Moreau PE, Descamps S. et al. Computed tomographic study of the posterior condylar angle in arthritic knees: its use in the rotational positioning of the femoral implant of total knee prostheses. Surg Radiol Anat 2003; 25 (3,4): 330-334
  • 28 Mullaji AB, Shetty GM, Lingaraju AP, Bhayde S. Which factors increase risk of malalignment of the hip-knee-ankle axis in TKA?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471 (01) 134-141
  • 29 Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM. Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002; (404) 7-13
  • 30 Ritter MA, Davis KE, Meding JB, Pierson JL, Berend ME, Malinzak RA. The effect of alignment and BMI on failure of total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93 (17) 1588-1596
  • 31 Mullaji AB, Shetty GM, Kanna R, Vadapalli RC. The influence of preoperative deformity on valgus correction angle: an analysis of 503 total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28 (01) 20-27
  • 32 Bardakos N, Cil A, Thompson B, Stocks G. Mechanical axis cannot be restored in total knee arthroplasty with a fixed valgus resection angle: a radiographic study. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22 (06, Suppl 2): 85-89
  • 33 Neil MJ, Atupan JB, Panti JPL, Massera RA, Howard S. Evaluation of lower limb axial alignment using digital radiography stitched films in pre-operative planning for total knee replacement. J Orthop 2016; 13 (04) 285-289
  • 34 Hodge WA, Schmitt S, Harman M, Mitchell K, Banks S. Intraoperative assessment of bone cuts to guide surgical technique during total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 (Suppl. 03) 137-143
  • 35 Matziolis G, Hube R, Perka C, Matziolis D. Increased flexion position of the femoral component reduces the flexion gap in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012; 20 (06) 1092-1096
  • 36 Otani T, Whiteside LA, White SE. Cutting errors in preparation of femoral components in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1993; 8 (05) 503-510
  • 37 Plaskos C, Hodgson AJ, Inkpen K, McGraw RW. Bone cutting errors in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17 (06) 698-705
  • 38 Radtke K, Becher C, Noll Y, Ostermeier S. Effect of limb rotation on radiographic alignment in total knee arthroplasties. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2010; 130 (04) 451-457
  • 39 Reed SC, Gollish J. The accuracy of femoral intramedullary guides in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1997; 12 (06) 677-682
  • 40 Haruta Y, Kawahara S, Tsuchimochi K, Hamasaki A, Hara T. Deviation of femoral intramedullary alignment rod influences coronal and sagittal alignment during total knee arthroplasty. Knee 2018; 25 (04) 644-649