CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2021; 15(04): 720-726
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1729457
Original Article

Influence of the Multiple Layers Application and the Heating of Silane on the Bond Strength between Lithium Disilicate Ceramics and Resinous Cement

Uriel Paulo Coelho Silva
1   Department of Dental Prosthesis, College Morgana Potrich and College Sul Americana, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil
,
Andréa Peixoto Maia
2   Department of Prosthodontics, São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Isaias Donizeti Silva
3   School of Dentistry, Santo Amaro University, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Milton Edson Miranda
2   Department of Prosthodontics, São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
,
William Cunha Brandt
3   School of Dentistry, Santo Amaro University, São Paulo, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to evaluate the bond strength between lithium disilicate ceramic and resinous cement when silane (Prosil, FGM) was applied in different amounts of layers under heating or not.

Materials and Methods Sixty IPS E-max CAD ceramic (Ivoclar) was used. They were conditioned with 10% hydrofluoric acid for 20 seconds. The samples were distributed in six groups (n = 10): 1Sil, 1 layer of silane without heating; 1SilAq, 1 layer of silane with heating; 2Sil, 2 layers without heating; 2SilAq, 2 layers with heating; 3Sil, 3 layers without heating; and 3SilAq, 3 layers with heating. After each layer, a jet of cold air was applied for 20 seconds in groups 1Sil, 2Sil, 3Sil, and jet of hot air (50°C) in groups 1SilAq, 2SilAq, and 3SilAq. Subsequently, an adhesive layer was applied, and fourcylinders were made on the ceramic with a resin cement AllCemVeneer and photoactivated for 20 seconds. The samples were stored at 37°C for 24 hours and analyzed to the microshear test at EMIC.

Statistical Analysis Data were submitted to ANOVA and Tukey’s test (α = 0.05).

Results The results showed that there was no statistical interaction between the factors studied. The “heating” factor was not statistically significant; however, the “silane layers” factor showed differences between groups. The analysis of the results showed that the use of one (66%) or two layers (67%) of silane regardless of heating, produced higher values of bond strength, when compared with the group of three layers (62%).

Conclusion The use of silane with one or two layers provided a greater bond strength between lithium disilicate ceramic and resinous cement and that the heating did not influence the results.



Publication History

Article published online:
07 July 2021

© 2021. European Journal of Dentistry. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Matinlinna JP, Lung CYK, Tsoi JKH. Silane adhesion mechanism in dental applications and surface treatments: a review. Dent Mater 2018; 34 (01) 13-28
  • 2 Juntavee N, Uasuwan P. Flexural strength of different monolithic computer-assisted design and computer-assisted manufacturing ceramic materials upon different thermal tempering processes. Eur J Dent 2020; 14 (04) 566-574
  • 3 Gracis S, Thompson VP, Ferencz JL, Silva NR, Bonfante EA. A new classification system for all-ceramic and ceramic-like restorative materials. Int J Prosthodont 2015; 28 (03) 227-235
  • 4 Lung CYK, Matinlinna JP. Aspects of silane coupling agents and surface conditioning in dentistry: an overview. Dent Mater 2012; 28 (05) 467-477
  • 5 Dimitriadi M, Zafiropoulou M, Zinelis S, Silikas N, Eliades G. Silane reactivity and resin bond strength to lithium disilicate ceramic surfaces. Dent Mater 2019; 35 (08) 1082-1094
  • 6 Özcan M. The use of chairside silica coating for different dental applications: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87 (05) 469-472
  • 7 Eslamian L, Ghassemi A, Amini F, Jafari A, Afrand M. Should silane coupling agents be used when bonding brackets to composite restorations? An in vitro study. Eur J Orthod 2009; 31 (03) 266-270
  • 8 Siqueira FS, Campos VS, Wendlinger M. et al Effect of self-etching primer associated to hydrofluoric acid or silane on bonding to lithium disilicate. Braz Dent J 2019; 30 (02) 171-178
  • 9 Eldafrawy M, Greimers L, Bekaert S. et al Silane influence on bonding to CAD-CAM composites: An interfacial fracture toughness study. Dent Mater 2019; 35 (09) 1279-1290
  • 10 Gutierrez NC, Moecke SE, Caneppele TM. et al Bond Strength of Composite Resin Restoration Repair: Influence of Silane and Adhesive Systems. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019; 20 (08) 880-886
  • 11 Monticelli F, Toledano M, Osorio R, Ferrari M. Effect of temperature on the silane coupling agents when bonding core resin to quartz fiber posts. Dent Mater 2006; 22 (11) 1024-1028
  • 12 Zaghloul H, Elkassas DW, Haridy MF. Effect of incorporation of silane in the bonding agent on the repair potential of machinable esthetic blocks. Eur J Dent 2014; 8 (01) 44-52
  • 13 Soleimani L, Alaghemand H, Fatemi SM, Esmaeili B. Effect of heat treatment and addition of 4-META to silane on microtensile bond strength of IPS e.max CAD ceramic to resin cement. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2019; 16 (05) 318-326
  • 14 Hooshmand T, van Noort R, Keshvad A. Bond durability of the resin-bonded and silane treated ceramic surface. Dent Mater 2002; 18 (02) 179-188
  • 15 Queiroz JR, Benetti P, Ozcan M. et al Surface characterization of feldspathic ceramic using ATR FT-IR and ellipsometry after various silanization protocols. Dent Mater 2012; 28 (02) 189-196
  • 16 Shen C, Oh WS, Williams JR. Effect of post-silanization drying on the bond strength of composite to ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 91 (05) 453-458
  • 17 Rao J, Zhou Y, Fan M. Revealing the interface structure and bonding mechanism of coupling agent treated WPC. Polymers (Basel) 2018; 10 (03) 266
  • 18 Ferracane JL. Current trends in dental composites. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1995; 6 (04) 302-318
  • 19 Matinlinna JP, Lassila LVJ, Vallittu PK. The effect of five silane coupling agents on the bond strength of a luting cement to a silica-coated titanium. Dent Mater 2007; 23 (09) 1173-1180
  • 20 Nihei T. Dental applications for silane coupling agents. J Oral Sci 2016; 58 (02) 151-155
  • 21 Underhill PR, Goring G, DuQuesnay DL. The effect of humidity on the curing of 3-glycidoxpropyltrimeetoxy silane. Int J Adhes 2000; 20: 195-199
  • 22 Roulet JF, Söderholm KJ, Longmate J. Effects of treatment and storage conditions on ceramic/composite bond strength. J Dent Res 1995; 74 (01) 381-387
  • 23 Abduljabbar T, AlQahtani MA, Jeaidi ZA, Vohra F. Influence of silane and heated silane on the bond strength of lithium disilicate ceramics - an in vitro study. Pak J Med Sci 2016; 32 (03) 550-554
  • 24 Pereira CN, Buono VT, Mota JM. The influence of silane evaporation procedures on microtensile bond strength between a dental ceramic and a resin cement. Indian J Dent Res 2010; 21 (02) 238-243
  • 25 Bertelsen CM, Boerio FJ. Linking mechanical properties of silanes to their chemical structure: an analytical study of y-GPS solutions and films. Prog Org Coat 2001; 41 (04) 239-246
  • 26 El-Nahhal IM, El-Ashgar NM. A review on polysiloxane-immobilized ligand systems: synthesis, characterization and application. J Organomet Chem 2007; 692: 2861-2886