Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) 2021; 56(06): 705-710
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1729586
Revisão Sistemática e Meta-análise
Mão

Nerve Graft and Nerve Transfer for Improving Elbow Flexion in Children with Obstetric Palsy. A Systematic Review[*]

Article in several languages: português | English
Eduardo Velásquez-Girón 
1   Seção de Cirurgia Ortopédica de Mão, Departamento de Cirurgia, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colômbia
,
James A. Zapata-Copete 
2   Departamento de Cirurgia, Seção de Cirurgia Plástica, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colômbia
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Obstetric brachial plexus palsy is a rather common injury in newborns, caused by traction to the brachial plexus during labor. In this context, with the present systematic review, we aimed to explore the use of nerve graft and nerve transfer as procedures to improve elbow flexion in children with obstetric palsy. For the present review, we followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Wholis and SCOPUS databases. Predetermined criteria defined the following requirements for inclusion of a study: Clinical trials, quasi-experiments, and cohort studies that performed nerve graft and nerve transfer in children (≤ 3 years old) with diagnosis of obstetric palsy. The risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of interventions assessment tool was used for nonrandomized studies. Out of seven studies that used both procedures, three of them compared the procedures of nerve graft with nerve transfer, and the other four combined them as a reconstructive method for children with obstetric palsy. According to the Medical Research Council grading system, both methods improved equally elbow flexion in the children. Overall, our results showed that both techniques of nerve graft and nerve transfer are equally good options for nerve reconstruction in cases of obstetric palsy. More studies approaching nerve reconstruction techniques in obstetric palsy should be made, preferably randomized clinical trials, to validate the results of the present systematic review.

Keywords

obstetrical brachial plexus palsy - nerve transfer - allogenic grafts

Authors Contributions

Girón E. V. and Zapata-Copete J. A. contributed substantially to the conception, design of the work, acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data for the work. Girón E. V. and Zapata-Copete J. A. contributed to the drafting of the work and revised it critically for important intellectual content. Girón E. V. and Zapata-Copete J. A. approved the final version to be published. Girón E. V. and Zapata-Copete J. A. agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or to the integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.


* Work developed at the Orthopedic Hand Surgery Section, Department of Surgery, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia.


Material suplementar

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 31 August 2020

Accepted: 17 December 2020

Article published online:
13 August 2021

© 2021. Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

 

  • Referências

  • 1 Thatte MR, Mehta R. Obstetric brachial plexus injury. Indian J Plast Surg 2011; 44 (03) 380-389
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Pondaag W, Malessy MJ, van Dijk JG, Thomeer RT. Natural history of obstetric brachial plexus palsy: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol 2004; 46 (02) 138-144
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Chang KWC, Wilson TJ, Popadich M, Brown SH, Chung KC, Yang LJS. Oberlin transfer compared with nerve grafting for improving early supination in neonatal brachial plexus palsy. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2018; 21 (02) 178-184
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Karamanos E, Rakitin I, Dream S, Siddiqui A. Nerve Transfer Surgery for Penetrating Upper Extremity Injuries. Perm J 2018; 22: 17-156
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Moore AM, MacEwan M, Santosa KB. et al. Acellular nerve allografts in peripheral nerve regeneration: a comparative study. Muscle Nerve 2011; 44 (02) 221-234
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Chen S, Chen Z-G, Dai H. et al. Repair, protection and regeneration of peripheral nerve injury. Neural Regen Res 2015; 10 (11) 1777-1798
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Siqueira M, Martins R, Faglioni Junior W, Foroni L, Heise C. Restoration of Elbow Flexion in Traumatic Upper Brachial Plexus Palsy in Adults: Outcome with Intraplexus Distal Nerve Transfers in 78 Patients. Arq Bras Neurocir 2018; 37 (04) 285-290
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 8 James MA. Use of the Medical Research Council muscle strength grading system in the upper extremity. J Hand Surg Am 2007; 32 (02) 154-156
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Bhardwaj P, Bhardwaj N. Motor grading of elbow flexion - is Medical Research Council grading good enough?. J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj 2009; 4: 3
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Urrútia G, Bonfill X. [PRISMA declaration: a proposal to improve the publication of systematic reviews and meta-analyses]. Med Clin (Barc) 2010; 135 (11) 507-511
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Sterne JAC, Hernán MA, Reeves BC. et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 2016; 355: i4919
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Tora MS, Hardcastle N, Texakalidis P, Wetzel J, Chern JJ. Elbow flexion in neonatal brachial plexus palsy: a meta-analysis of graft versus transfer. Childs Nerv Syst 2019; 35 (06) 929-935
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Luszawski J, Marcol W, Mandera M. The components of shoulder and elbow movements as goals of primary reconstructive operation in obstetric brachial plexus lesions. Neurol Neurochir Pol 2017; 51 (05) 366-371
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Malessy MJA, Pondaag W. Neonatal brachial plexus palsy with neurotmesis of C5 and avulsion of C6: supraclavicular reconstruction strategies and outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96 (20) e174
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Yang KX, Zhang SH, Ge DW, Sui T, Chen HT, Cao XJ. A novel extradural nerve transfer technique by coaptation of C4 to C5 and C7 to C6 for treating isolated upper trunk avulsion of the brachial plexus. J Biomed Res 2018; 32 (04) 298-304
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Bhandari P. Functional Outcomes of Nerve Reconstruction in Severe Obstetric Brachial Plexus Palsy. Indian J Neurotrauma 2015; 12 (01) 41-48
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Andrisevic E, Taniguchi M, Partington MD, Agel J, Van Heest AE. Neurolysis alone as the treatment for neuroma-in-continuity with more than 50% conduction in infants with upper trunk brachial plexus birth palsy. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2014; 13 (02) 229-237
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Bhandari PS, Sadhotra LP, Bhargava P. et al. Surgical outcomes following nerve transfers in upper brachial plexus injuries. Indian J Plast Surg 2009; 42 (02) 150-160
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Al-Qattan MM, Al-Kharfy TM. Median nerve to biceps nerve transfer to restore elbow flexion in obstetric brachial plexus palsy. BioMed Res Int 2014; 2014: 854084
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Birch R, Ahad N, Kono H, Smith S. Repair of obstetric brachial plexus palsy: results in 100 children. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87 (08) 1089-1095
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Terzis JK, Kokkalis ZT. Elbow flexion after primary reconstruction in obstetric brachial plexus palsy. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2009; 34 (04) 449-458
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Xu J, Cheng X, Gu Y. Different methods and results in the treatment of obstetrical brachial plexus palsy. J Reconstr Microsurg 2000; 16 (06) 417-420 , discussion 420–422
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Donega V, van Velthoven CT, Nijboer CH, Kavelaars A, Heijnen CJ. The endogenous regenerative capacity of the damaged newborn brain: boosting neurogenesis with mesenchymal stem cell treatment. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2013; 33 (05) 625-634
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Huelke DF. An Overview of Anatomical Considerations of Infants and Children in the Adult World of Automobile Safety Design. Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med 1998; 42: 93-113
    Google Scholar