J Knee Surg 2023; 36(01): 095-104
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1729968
Original Article

Knee Stability following Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty: Comparison of Medial Preserving Gap Technique and Measured Resection Technique

Autoren

  • Masanori Tsubosaka

    1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
  • Hirotsugu Muratsu

    2   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Steel Memorial Hirohata Hospital, Himeji, Japan
  • Naoki Nakano

    1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
  • Tomoyuki Kamenaga

    1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
  • Yuichi Kuroda

    1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
  • Takao Inokuchi

    2   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Steel Memorial Hirohata Hospital, Himeji, Japan
  • Hidetoshi Miya

    2   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Steel Memorial Hirohata Hospital, Himeji, Japan
  • Ryosuke Kuroda

    1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
  • Tomoyuki Matsumoto

    1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan

Abstract

Novel medial preserving gap technique (MPGT) focuses on medial compartment stability and allows lateral physiological laxity. This study aimed to compare the MPGT with the measured resection technique (MRT) to determine which provides better postoperative knee stability after posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty (PS-TKA). Primary PS-TKA, using either MPGT (n = 65) or MRT (n = 65), was performed in 130 patients with varus knee osteoarthritis. Postoperative knee stabilities at extension and flexion were assessed using varus–valgus stress radiographs and stress epicondylar view, respectively (at 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years postoperatively). The distance between the femoral prosthesis and polyethylene insert was measured on each medial and lateral side, defined as the medial joint opening (MJO) and lateral joint opening (LJO), respectively. Decreasing MJO or LJO translated to increasing postoperative stability. The femoral external rotation angle was compared between the two surgical techniques; postoperative knee stability was also compared between the medial and lateral compartments, as well as the surgical techniques. A significant difference was found in the femoral external rotation angle between MPGT (4.2 ± 0.2 degrees) and MRT (3.6 ± 0.1 degrees, p < 0.01). Postoperative MJOs both at extension and flexion were significantly smaller than LJOs using MPGT and MRT at all time points (p < 0.05). MJOs and LJOs at extension using MPGT were significantly smaller than those when using MRT, at 1 and 3 years postoperatively (p < 0.05). Furthermore, MJOs at flexion using MPGT were significantly smaller than those when using MRT at 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years postoperatively (p < 0.05). MPGT provided higher postoperative medial knee stability than MRT both at extension and flexion, even at 3 years after PS-TKA. This suggests that this newly developed surgical technique is a more feasible option than MRT for the preservation of postoperative medial knee stability.



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 21. Januar 2021

Angenommen: 01. April 2021

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
15. Mai 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA