CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · The Arab Journal of Interventional Radiology 2021; 5(01): 011-015
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1730114
Original Article

Percutaneous Biliary Drain Complications in Transplanted versus Native Liver: A Comparative Retrospective Study

Lauren Marissa Stumbras
1   Dotter Interventional Institute, Oregon Health & Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, United States
,
Keith Quencer
2   Department of Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
,
2   Department of Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this study was to assess the rate of complications of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drain in transplanted versus native livers.

Materials and Methods A retrospective chart review was performed of all percutaneous transhepatic biliary drains completed at our institution from 2009 to 2018. Chart review of complications and interventions was recorded. Chi-squared and Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare percutaneous transhepatic biliary drains performed in patients with liver transplants (n = 62) to those with native livers (n = 285).

Results There was a statistically significant difference in the frequency of complications of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drains in patients with liver transplants (61%) compared with those with native livers (13%), χ2(1) = 9.59, p<0.01. There was a statistically significant increased frequency of worsening liver function, sepsis, bile leak, arterial and portal venous bleeds, and secondary complications in those with liver transplants. The median number of days until the complication occurred for those with liver transplants was nearly three times longer than those with native livers. The most common subsequent intervention for patients with liver transplants was placement of a new drain (53%), whereas those with native livers was drain upsize (70%).

Conclusion Complications including vascular injury, sepsis, bile leak, and worsening liver function after percutaneous transhepatic biliary drains occurred more commonly in patients with liver transplants versus native livers.



Publication History

Article published online:
04 June 2021

© 2021. The Pan Arab Interventional Radiology Society. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Burke DR, Lewis CA, Cardella JF. et al. Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography and biliary drainage. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14 (09) S243-S246
  • 2 Nennstiel S, Weber A, Frick G. et al. Drainage-related complications in percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage: an analysis over 10 years. J Clin Gastroenterol 2015; 49 (09) 764-770
  • 3 Mehrzad H, Mangat K. The role of interventional radiology in treating complications following liver transplantation. ISRN Hepatology 2013; doi: 10.1155/2013/696794
  • 4 Wojcicki M, Milkiewicz P, Silva M. Biliary tract complications after liver transplantation: a review. Dig Surg 2008; 25 (04) 245-257
  • 5 Khashab MA, Tariq A, Tariq U. et al. Delayed and unsuccessful endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography are associated with worse outcomes in patients with acute cholangitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10 (10) 1157-1161
  • 6 Shiau EL, Liang HL, Lin YH. et al. The complication of hepatic artery injuries of 1,304 percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in a single institute. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2017; 28 (07) 1025-1032
  • 7 Mueller PR, van Sonnenberg E, Ferrucci Jr JT. Percutaneous biliary drainage: technical and catheter-related problems in 200 procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1982; 138 (01) 17-23
  • 8 Winick AB, Waybill PN, Venbrux AC. Complications of percutaneous transhepatic biliary interventions. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2001; 4 (03) 200-206
  • 9 Yarmohammadi H, Covey AM. Percutaneous biliary interventions and complications in malignant bile duct obstruction. Linchuang Zhongliuxue Zazhi 2016; 5 (05) 68
  • 10 Quencer KB, Tadros AS, Marashi KB. et al. Bleeding after percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage: incidence, causes and treatments. J Clin Med 2018; 7 (05) 94
  • 11 Venkatanarasimha N, Damodharan K, Gogna A. et al. Diagnosis and management of complications from percutaneous biliary tract interventions. Radiographics 2017; 37 (02) 665-680
  • 12 Woo YS, Lee KH, Lee KT. et al. Postoperative changes of liver enzymes can distinguish between biliary stricture and graft rejection after living donor liver transplantation: a longitudinal study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96 (40) e6892
  • 13 Caiado AH, Blasbalg R, Marcelino AS. et al. Complications of liver transplantation: multimodality imaging approach. Radiographics 2007; 27 (05) 1401-1417
  • 14 Thornburg B, Katariya N, Riaz A. et al. Interventional radiology in the management of the liver transplant patient. Liver Transpl 2007; 23 (10) 1328-1341
  • 15 Weber A, Gaa J, Rosca B. et al. Complications of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in patients with dilated and nondilated intrahepatic bile ducts. Eur J Radiol 2009; 72 (03) 412-417
  • 16 Rivera-Sanfeliz GM, Assar OS, LaBerge JM. et al. Incidence of important hemobilia following transhepatic biliary drainage: left-sided versus right-sided approaches. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2004; 27 (02) 137-139