Open Access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · The Arab Journal of Interventional Radiology 2019; 03(03): S21-S22
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1730578
Abstract

Percutaneous Image-Guided Gastrostomy Insertion with and without Gastropexy: A Single Tertiary Care Center Experience in Saudi Arabia

Authors

  • Shaima Ahmed Abdulrahman

    King Abdulaziz Medical City, National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Yousof Alzahrani

    King Abdulaziz Medical City, National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Hana Alfaleh

    King Abdulaziz Medical City, National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Fawziah Alorfi

    King Abdulaziz Medical City, National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Ali Rajeh

    King Abdulaziz Medical City, National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Nehal Alghamdi

    King Abdulaziz Medical City, National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Mohammed Aljarie

    King Abdulaziz Medical City, National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Mohammad Arabi

    King Abdulaziz Medical City, National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Preview

Background: Gastropexy is used by many interventional radiologists during percutaneous image-guided gastrostomy insertion. This study compares major and minor complication rates of gastrostomy insertion with and without gastropexy at our center. Method(s): This is a retrospective observational study including adult patients who underwent image-guided gastrostomy insertion at our center from January 1st, 2015 to November 30th, 2018. The sample was divided into patients who had gastrostomy insertion with gastropexy and those without. Major and minor complication rates were assessed based on the Society of Interventional Radiology guidelines and compared using Chi-square. Result(s): A total of 830 patients [512 males (61.8%); 318 females (38.2%)] were included. Gastropexy was performed for 428 (51.6%) patients [1 anchor, 41 patients (9.6%); 2 anchors, 268 patients (62.7%); 3 anchors, 118 patients (27.5%); and 4 anchors, 1 patient (0.2%)]. The remaining 402 patients (48.4%) had no gastropexy. Technical success was achieved in 100% with and without gastropexy. A total of 143 complications occurred; 6 major and 137 minor. For those who had major complications, 2 were from gastropexy group. No significant difference was found in major (0.47% vs 1%, P=0.37), or minor complication rate (18.7% vs 14.2%, P=0.08) between gastropexy and no gastropexy groups, respectively. Furthermore, there was no significant difference when studying complication rates in relation to the number of anchors used (P= 0.32 for major complications, P= 0.57 for minor complications). Conclusion(s): No significant difference in major or minor complication rates was found between patients who underwent gastrostomy insertion with gastropexy versus without gastropexy. Furthermore, no significant difference in complications was found in relation to the number of anchors used.



Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
11. Mai 2021

© 2019. The Arab Journal of Interventional Radiology. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India