Open Access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · The Arab Journal of Interventional Radiology 2019; 03(03): S36
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1730623
Abstract

Drug-Coated Balloon use in Dysfunctional Arterio-Venous Access Treatment the Effect of Consecutive Treatments in Target Lesion Primary Patency

Authors

  • Michail Theofanis

    Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Patras University Hospital, Patras, Greece
  • Ioannis Spyridonidis

    Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Patras University Hospital, Patras, Greece
  • Panagiotis Kitrou

    Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Patras University Hospital, Patras, Greece
  • Panagiotis Papadimatos

    Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Patras University Hospital, Patras, Greece
  • Konstantinos Katsanos

    Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Patras University Hospital, Patras, Greece
  • Dimitrios Karnabatidis

    Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Patras University Hospital, Patras, Greece
Preview

Background: This was a retrospective longitudinal analysis investigating the safety and effectiveness of consecutive treatments with the Lutonix Drug-Coated Balloons (DCB) in dysfunctional arteriovenous access; both fistulae (AVF) and grafts (AVG). Method(s): From January 2015 to December 2017 (3 years), 339 Lutonix DCB were used in 257 procedures of 165 patients with a dysfunctional AVF or AVG. Of these patients, 33 had ≥2 procedures, adequate data and were included in the analysis. In these patients, 112 procedures were performed (22 treated twice, 4 patients 3 times, 7 patients 4 times, 2 patients 5 times and 3 patients 6 times) using 133 devices. Mean lesion follow-up was 247 days (min. 20 days – max. 908 days). Mean balloon diameter was 8.13 mm (3-12 mm) and length 63.16 mm (40-150 mm). Primary outcome measure safety, defined as freedom from any serious adverse event(s) involving the AV access circuit through 30 days for all procedures and target lesion primary patency (TLPP). Secondary outcome measures included investigation of independent factors that may influence outcomes. Result(s): Safety was reached in all cases (112/112 procedures, 100%). Median TLPP was 227 days for the first intervention and 280 days for the second consecutive intervention [p=0.37; Hazard ratio: 1.271 (CI: 0.75-2.16)]. Conclusion(s): Consecutive use of the Lutonix DCB for the treatment of dysfunctional dialysis access was safe. There was no significant difference in TLPP between the 1st and 2nd procedure, although a numerical improvement was observed. Results suggest consistency in TLPP regardless of the aging arterio-venous access.



Publication History

Article published online:
11 May 2021

© 2019. The Arab Journal of Interventional Radiology. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India