Unilateral Thoracoscopic Thymectomy for Thymoma: Does Side Matter? A Single Institutional Experience

Abstract

Background Thoracoscopic thymectomy is increasingly performed for the treatment of early stage thymoma. It is characterized by shorter postoperative hospital stay, decreased intraoperative blood loss, and fewer complications compared with transsternal thymectomy. Unilateral video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) thymectomy can be easily performed from either side of the thorax, because thymus is located in the middle of mediastinum. However, the side that provides better outcomes remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of right and left approaches in performing unilateral thoracoscopic thymectomy for thymoma.

Methods Consecutive patients affected by thymoma who underwent VATS thymectomy on either side between February 2001 and March 2020 were enrolled in the study. Clinicopathologic, surgical, and oncological outcomes were retrospectively analyzed and compared among the two surgical approaches.

Results Unilateral VATS approaches were performed on 29 patients: 12 (41%) on the left side and 17 (59%) on the right side. The mean age was 63.1 ± 11.3 years and the female/male ratio was 1.73:1. The mean operative time and the hospital stay for the left-side VATS and right-side VATS groups were, respectively, 168 ± 49.5 versus 171 ± 47.9 minutes (p = 0.9) and 3 ± 1.03 days versus 3.65 ± 1.93 days (p = 0.7). Postoperative complications occurred in one patient (3%) for left-side VATS group and one patient (3%) for right-side VATS. The 5-year disease-free survival was comparable between two groups (p = 0.74).

Conclusion Unilateral VATS thymectomy in patients with thymoma can be safely and effectively performed by experienced surgeons in either side of the thorax with equivalent oncological outcomes.

Keywords

myasthenia gravis - VATS - thymectomy - outcomes - thymoma

Publication History

Received: 23 January 2021

Accepted: 26 April 2021

Article published online:
14 September 2021

• References

• 1 Savcenko M, Wendt GK, Prince SL, Mack MJ. Video-assisted thymectomy for myasthenia gravis: an update of a single institution experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002; 22 (06) 978-983
• 2 Meyer DM, Herbert MA, Sobhani NC. et al. Comparative clinical outcomes of thymectomy for myasthenia gravis performed by extended transsternal and minimally invasive approaches. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 87 (02) 385-390 , discussion 390–391
• 3 Youssef SJ, Louie BE, Farivar AS, Blitz M, Aye RW, Vallières E. Comparison of open and minimally invasive thymectomies at a single institution. Am J Surg 2010; 199 (05) 589-593
• 4 Masaoka A, Monden Y, Nakahara K, Tanioka T. Follow-up study of thymomas with special reference to their clinical stages. Cancer 1981; 48 (11) 2485-2492
• 5 Kondo K. Therapy for thymic epithelial tumors. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 62 (08) 468-474
• 6 Mantegazza R, Baggi F, Bernasconi P. et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic extended thymectomy and extended transsternal thymectomy (T-3b) in non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis patients: remission after 6 years of follow-up. J Neurol Sci 2003; 212 (1-2): 31-36
• 7 Zahid I, Sharif S, Routledge T, Scarci M. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or transsternal thymectomy in the treatment of myasthenia gravis?. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2011; 12 (01) 40-46
• 8 Jurado J, Javidfar J, Newmark A. et al. Minimally invasive thymectomy and open thymectomy: outcome analysis of 263 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2012; 94 (03) 974-981 , discussion 981–982
• 9 Maniscalco P, Tamburini N, Quarantotto F, Grossi W, Garelli E, Cavallesco G. Long-term outcome for early stage thymoma: comparison between thoracoscopic and open approaches. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 63 (03) 201-205
• 10 Ye B, Tantai JC, Ge XX. et al. Surgical techniques for early-stage thymoma: video-assisted thoracoscopic thymectomy versus transsternal thymectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 147 (05) 1599-1603
• 11 Liu TJ, Lin MW, Hsieh MS. et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical thymectomy to treat early thymoma: a comparison with the conventional transsternal approach. Ann Surg Oncol 2014; 21 (01) 322-328
• 12 Xie A, Tjahjono R, Phan K, Yan TD. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus open thymectomy for thymoma: a systematic review. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2015; 4 (06) 495-508
• 13 de Perrot M, Bril V, McRae K, Keshavjee S. Impact of minimally invasive trans-cervical thymectomy on outcome in patients with myasthenia gravis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003; 24 (05) 677-683
• 14 Rückert JC, Swierzy M, Ismail M. Comparison of robotic and nonrobotic thoracoscopic thymectomy: a cohort study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 141 (03) 673-677
• 15 Kido T, Hazama K, Inoue Y, Tanaka Y, Takao T. Resection of anterior mediastinal masses through an infrasternal approach. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 67 (01) 263-265
• 16 Odaka M, Akiba T, Yabe M. et al. Unilateral thoracoscopic subtotal thymectomy for the treatment of stage I and II thymoma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010; 37 (04) 824-826
• 17 Agasthian T. Can invasive thymomas be resected by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery?. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2011; 19 (3-4): 225-227
• 18 Liu Z, Yang J, Lin L, Huang J, Jiang G. Unilateral video-assisted thoracoscopic extended thymectomy offers long-term outcomes equivalent to that of the bilateral approach in the treatment of non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2015; 21 (05) 610-615
• 19 Mineo TC, Pompeo E, Lerut TE, Bernardi G, Coosemans W, Nofroni I. Thoracoscopic thymectomy in autoimmune myasthenia: results of left-sided approach. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 69 (05) 1537-1541
• 20 Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40 (05) 373-383
• 21 Marx A, Chan JK, Coindre JM. et al. The 2015 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Thymus: continuity and changes. J Thorac Oncol 2015; 10 (10) 1383-1395
• 22 Detterbeck FC, Nicholson AG, Kondo K, Van Schil P, Moran C. The Masaoka-Koga stage classification for thymic malignancies: clarification and definition of terms. J Thorac Oncol 2011; 6 (07, Suppl 3): S1710-S1716
• 23 Detterbeck FC, Stratton K, Giroux D. et al; Staging and Prognostic Factors Committee, Members of the Advisory Boards, Participating Institutions of the Thymic Domain. The IASLC/ITMIG Thymic Epithelial Tumors Staging Project: proposal for an evidence-based stage classification system for the forthcoming (8th) edition of the TNM classification of malignant tumors. J Thorac Oncol 2014; 9 (09, Suppl 2): S65-S72
• 24 Rami-Porta R. Ed. Staging Manual in Thoracic Oncology. 2nd edition. North Fort Meyers (FL): Editorial Rx Press; 2016: 237-258
• 25 Jaretzki III A, Barohn RJ, Ernstoff RM. et al; Task Force of the Medical Scientific Advisory Board of the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America. Myasthenia gravis: recommendations for clinical research standards. Neurology 2000; 55 (01) 16-23
• 26 Yang Y, Dong J, Huang Y. Thoracoscopic thymectomy versus open thymectomy for the treatment of thymoma: a meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2016; 42 (11) 1720-1728
• 27 Friedant AJ, Handorf EA, Su S, Scott WJ. Minimally invasive thymectomy versus open thymectomy for thymic malignancies: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Oncol 2016; 11 (01) 30-38
• 28 Mack MJ, Landreneau RJ, Yim AP, Hazelrigg SR, Scruggs GR. Results of video-assisted thymectomy in patients with myasthenia gravis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 112 (05) 1352-1359 , discussion 1359–1360
• 29 Sakamaki Y, Oda T, Kanazawa G, Shimokawa T, Kido T, Shiono H. Intermediate-term oncologic outcomes after video-assisted thoracoscopic thymectomy for early-stage thymoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 148 (04) 1230-1237.e1