PDF herunterladen
CC BY 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2022; 16(01): 153-160
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1734469
Original Article

Comparative Evaluation of Resin Dentin Interface using Universal and Total- Etch Adhesive Systems on Sound and Eroded Dentin: In Vitro Study

Ghayathri Kanniappan 
1   Faculty of Dentistry, MAHSA University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
,
Padmini Hari
1   Faculty of Dentistry, MAHSA University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
,
Ravikanth H. Jujare
1   Faculty of Dentistry, MAHSA University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
› Institutsangaben Funding None.
› Weitere Informationen
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to compare the resin-dentin interface of sound and eroded dentin using universal and total-etch adhesive systems.

Materials and Methods Forty caries-free extracted human premolars were collected, and the occlusal surfaces were ground by using slow speed diamond disc with copious water supply until a flat superficial dentin was exposed. The test group underwent erosive cycle (n = 20), and another group (n = 20) was reserved for control group. Erosive protocol consisted of immersion in 1.23% citric acid for 1 minute every 12 hours and stored in artificial saliva. Both the control and eroded teeth were further subdivided (n = 10) for composite restoration by using either self-etch or total-etch systems. Then the tooth samples were sectioned longitudinally and observed under confocal laser scanning microscope at ×10 magnification to evaluate resin tag length and hybrid layer thickness.

Statistical Analysis The data obtained were analyzed by using independent t-test.

Results The highest mean value of the resin tag length and thickness of hybrid layer was observed with total-etch system in sound dentin group compared with other groups (p < 0.001).

Conclusion The resin-dentin interface of sound dentin was found to be better than eroded dentin by using total-etch system. The resin-dentin interface of eroded dentin was superior to sound dentin by using self-etch adhesive system.

Keywords

confocal laser scanning microscope - eroded dentin - resin tag length - total-etch adhesive - universal adhesive


Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
01. Oktober 2021

© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Reis AF, Oliveira MT, Giannini M, De Goes MF, Rueggeberg FA. The effect of organic solvents on one-bottle adhesives’ bond strength to enamel and dentin. Oper Dent 2003; 28 (06) 700-706
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Bouillaguet S, Gysi P, Wataha JC. et al. Bond strength of composite to dentin using conventional, one-step, and self-etching adhesive systems. J Dent 2001; 29 (01) 55-61
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Van Landuyt KL, De Munck J, Mine A, Cardoso MV, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B. Filler debonding & subhybrid-layer failures in self-etch adhesives. J Dent Res 2010; 89 (10) 1045-1050
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Sofan E, Sofan A, Palaia G, Tenore G, Romeo U, Migliau G. Classification review of dental adhesive systems: from the IV generation to the universal type. Ann Stomatol (Roma) 2017; 8 (01) 1-17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T. et al. Bonding effectiveness of a new ‘multi-mode’ adhesive to enamel and dentine. J Dent 2012; 40 (06) 475-484
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Perdigão J, Sezinando A, Monteiro PC. Laboratory bonding ability of a multi-purpose dentin adhesive. Am J Dent 2012; 25 (03) 153-158
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Zimmerli B, De Munck J, Lussi A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Long-term bonding to eroded dentin requires superficial bur preparation. Clin Oral Investig 2012; 16 (05) 1451-1461
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 AlShahrani MT, Haralur SB, Alqarni M. Restorative rehabilitation of a patient with dental erosion. Case Rep Dent 2017; 2017: 9517486
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Jaeggi T, Lussi A. Prevalence, incidence and distribution of erosion. Monogr Oral Sci 2014; 25: 55-73
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Brusius CD, Alves LS, Susin C, Maltz M. Dental erosion among South Brazilian adolescents: a 2.5-year longitudinal study. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2018; 46 (01) 17-23
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Proença JP, Polido M, Osorio E. et al. Dentin regional bond strength of self-etch and total-etch adhesive systems. Dent Mater 2007; 23 (12) 1542-1548
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Milosevic A. Direct placement composite: the treatment modality of choice to restore the worn or eroded dentition in primary dental care. Prim Dent J 2016; 5 (03) 25-29
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hamdy TM. Interfacial microscopic examination and chemical analysis of resin-dentin interface of self-adhering flowable resin composite. F1000 Res 2017; 6: 1688
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Milosevic A, Burnside G. The survival of direct composite restorations in the management of severe tooth wear including attrition and erosion: a prospective 8-year study. J Dent 2016; 44: 13-19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Frattes FC, Augusto MG, Torres CRG, Pucci CR, Borges AB. Bond strength to eroded enamel and dentin using a universal adhesive system. J Adhes Dent 2017; 19 (02) 121-127
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Borgo GO, Vieira-Junior WF, Theobaldo JD, Aguiar FHB, Lima DANL. Effect of dentin pretreatment with arginine on microshear bond strength of etch-and-rinse or self-etch adhesive systems. Eur J Dent 2019; 13 (02) 199-205
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Federlin M, Thonemann B, Schmalz G, Urlinger T. Clinical evaluation of different adhesive systems for restoring teeth with erosion lesions. Clin Oral Investig 1998; 2 (02) 58-66
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Brackett WW, Brackett MG, Dib A, Franco G, Estudillo H. Eighteen-month clinical performance of a self-etching primer in unprepared class V resin restorations Oper Dent 30(4):424–429
  • 19 Lima JFM, Wajngarten D, Islam F, Clifford J, Botta AC. Effect of adhesive mode and chlorhexidine on microtensile strength of universal bonding agent to sound and caries-affected dentins. Eur J Dent 2018; 12 (04) 553-558
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Yabuki C, Rikuta A, Murayama R. et al. Effect of acid erosion on enamel bond strength of self-etch adhesives and sonic velocity measurement of enamel. Dent Mater J 2018; 37 (04) 542-548
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Ibrahim IM, Elkassas DW, Yousry MM. Effect of EDTA and phosphoric acid pretreatment on the bonding effectiveness of self-etch adhesives to ground enamel. Eur J Dent 2010; 4 (04) 418-428
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Pioch T, Stotz S, Staehle HJ, Duschner H. Applications of confocal laser scanning microscopy to dental bonding. Adv Dent Res 1997; 11 (04) 453-461
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Ramya MK, Nayak M, Prasada K, Nair SV, Norohna GF, Nambiar JM. Evaluation of resin dentin interface of a self-etch adhesive in comparison with a total-etch adhesive using confocal microscopy. J Int Oral Health 2015; 7 (11) 24-27
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 World Health Organization. Occupational safety and health in public health emergencies. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/275385/9789241514347-eng.pdf?ua=1&ua=1. Accessed 2018
  • 25 Bim Júnior O, Cebim MA, Atta MT, Machado CM, Francisconi-Dos-Rios LF, Wang L. Determining optimal fluorescent agent concentrations in dental adhesive resins for imaging the tooth/restoration interface. Microsc Microanal 2017; 23 (01) 122-130
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Pegado RE, do Amaral FL, Flório FM, Basting RT. Effect of different bonding strategies on adhesion to deep and superficial permanent dentin. Eur J Dent 2010; 4 (02) 110-117
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 McCabe JF, Rusby S. Dentine bonding agents–characteristic bond strength as a function of dentine depth. J Dent 1992; 20 (04) 225-230
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Tedesco TK, Calvo AFB, Yoshioka L, Fukushima KA, Cesar PF, Raggio DP. Does acid challenge affect the properties and bond stability of restorative materials on primary teeth?. J Adhes Dent 2018; 20 (03) 223-231
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Young A, Tenuta LMA. Initial erosion models. Caries Res 2011; 45 (01) 33-42
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Watson TF. A confocal optical microscope study of the morphology of the tooth/restoration interface using Scotchbond 2 dentin adhesive. J Dent Res 1989; 68 (06) 1124-1131
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Watson TF. Applications of confocal scanning optical microscopy to dentistry. Br Dent J 1991; 171 (09) 287-291
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Marigo L, Lajolo C, Castagnola R, Angerame D, Somma F. Morphological confocal laser scanning microscope evaluation of four different “etch and rinse” adhesives in post endodontic restoration. Dent Mater J 2012; 31 (06) 988-994
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Usha H, Kumari A, Mehta D, Kaiwar A, Jain N. Comparing microleakage and layering methods of silorane-based resin composite in class V cavities using confocal microscopy: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2011; 14 (02) 164-168
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Yassen GH, Platt JA, Hara AT. Bovine teeth as substitute for human teeth in dental research: a review of literature. J Oral Sci 2011; 53 (03) 273-282
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Sundfeld RH, Valentino TA, de RS Alexandre, Briso ALF, Sundefeld ML. Hybrid layer thickness and resin tag length of a self-etching adhesive bonded to sound dentin. J Dent 2005; 33 (08) 675-681
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Ganss C, Schlueter N, Hardt M. von Hinckeldey J, Klimek J. Effects of toothbrushing on eroded dentine. Eur J Oral Sci 2007; 115 (05) 390-396
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Baweja P, Hemamalathi S, Velmurugan N, Kandaswamy D. A confocal microscopic evaluation of the hybrid layer and resin tag formation of a total-etch technique in comparison with self-etching primers with three different pH. J Conserv Dent 2007; 10 (03) 104
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Krüger J, Maletz R, Ottl P, Warkentin M. In vitro aging behavior of dental composites considering the influence of filler content, storage media and incubation time. PLoS One 2018; 13 (04) e0195160
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar