Semin intervent Radiol 2021; 38(04): 425-431
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735529
Review Article

Radiation Segmentectomy

Kristina Prachanronarong
1   Department of Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York
,
Edward Kim
1   Department of Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Radiation segmentectomy is an yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization treatment where a high radiation dose is administered to a small volume of liver to achieve a high tumoricidal dose to a target with anatomic surgical precision while sparing surrounding parenchyma. This therapeutic modality is often used to treat hepatocellular carcinoma, and recent studies have demonstrated that radiation segmentectomy is an effective treatment as a neoadjuvant to transplant, resection, or as a standalone treatment. This article provides a review of radiation segmentectomy, indications for treatment, recent outcome data, and guidelines for postprocedural management.



Publication History

Article published online:
07 October 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Kim E, Titano JJ, Lekperic S. Radioembolization in Segmentectomy, Lobectomy, and Future Liver Remnant Hypertrophy. CRC Press; 2017: 131-150
  • 2 Titano J, Noor A, Kim E. Transarterial chemoembolization and radioembolization across Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stages. Semin Intervent Radiol 2017; 34 (02) 109-115
  • 3 Lewandowski RJ, Gabr A, Abouchaleh N. et al. Radiation segmentectomy: potential curative therapy for early hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiology 2018; 287 (03) 1050-1058
  • 4 Rhee TK, Omary RA, Gates V. et al. The effect of catheter-directed CT angiography on yttrium-90 radioembolization treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2005; 16 (08) 1085-1091
  • 5 Riaz A, Gates VL, Atassi B. et al. Radiation segmentectomy: a novel approach to increase safety and efficacy of radioembolization. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011; 79 (01) 163-171
  • 6 Salem R, Johnson GE, Kim E. et al. Yttrium-90 radioembolization for the treatment of solitary, unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: the LEGACY study. Hepatology 2021; (epub ahead of print)
  • 7 Ben-Josef E, Normolle D, Ensminger WD. et al. Phase II trial of high-dose conformal radiation therapy with concurrent hepatic artery floxuridine for unresectable intrahepatic malignancies. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23 (34) 8739-8747
  • 8 Vouche M, Habib A, Ward TJ. et al. Unresectable solitary hepatocellular carcinoma not amenable to radiofrequency ablation: multicenter radiology-pathology correlation and survival of radiation segmentectomy. Hepatology 2014; 60 (01) 192-201
  • 9 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Electronic address: easloffice@easloffice.eu, European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2018; 69 (01) 182-236
  • 10 Llovet JM, Brú C, Bruix J. Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: the BCLC staging classification. Semin Liver Dis 1999; 19 (03) 329-338
  • 11 Titano J, Voutsinas N, Kim E. The role of radioembolization in bridging and downstaging hepatocellular carcinoma to curative therapy. Semin Nucl Med 2019; 49 (03) 189-196
  • 12 Forner A, Reig ME, de Lope CR, Bruix J. Current strategy for staging and treatment: the BCLC update and future prospects. Semin Liver Dis 2010; 30 (01) 61-74
  • 13 Mazzaferro V, Regalia E, Doci R. et al. Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis. N Engl J Med 1996; 334 (11) 693-699
  • 14 Wald C, Russo MW, Heimbach JK, Hussain HK, Pomfret EA, Bruix J. New OPTN/UNOS policy for liver transplant allocation: standardization of liver imaging, diagnosis, classification, and reporting of hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiology 2013; 266 (02) 376-382
  • 15 Kulik L. Criteria for liver transplantation in hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken) 2015; 6 (04) 100-102
  • 16 Salem R, Thurston KG. Radioembolization with yttrium-90 microspheres: a state-of-the-art brachytherapy treatment for primary and secondary liver malignancies: part 3: comprehensive literature review and future direction. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2006; 17 (10) 1571-1593
  • 17 Chen MH, Wei Y, Yan K. et al. Treatment strategy to optimize radiofrequency ablation for liver malignancies. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2006; 17 (04) 671-683
  • 18 Livraghi T, Meloni F, Di Stasi M. et al. Sustained complete response and complications rates after radiofrequency ablation of very early hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: Is resection still the treatment of choice?. Hepatology 2008; 47 (01) 82-89
  • 19 Pompili M, Saviano A, de Matthaeis N. et al. Long-term effectiveness of resection and radiofrequency ablation for single hepatocellular carcinoma ≤3 cm. Results of a multicenter Italian survey. J Hepatol 2013; 59 (01) 89-97
  • 20 Kim HC, Kim YJ, Lee JH, Suh KS, Chung JW. Feasibility of boosted radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma larger than 5 cm. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2019; 30 (01) 1-8
  • 21 Padia SA, Kwan SW, Roudsari B, Monsky WL, Coveler A, Harris WP. Superselective yttrium-90 radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma yields high response rates with minimal toxicity. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2014; 25 (07) 1067-1073
  • 22 Padia SA, Johnson GE, Horton KJ. et al. Segmental yttrium-90 radioembolization versus segmental chemoembolization for localized hepatocellular carcinoma: results of a single-center, retrospective, propensity score-matched study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2017; 28 (06) 777-785.e1
  • 23 Biederman DM, Titano JJ, Bishay VL. et al. Radiation segmentectomy versus TACE combined with microwave ablation for unresectable solitary hepatocellular carcinoma up to 3 cm: a propensity score matching study. Radiology 2017; 283 (03) 895-905
  • 24 Biederman DM, Titano JJ, Korff RA. et al. Radiation segmentectomy versus selective chemoembolization in the treatment of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2018; 29 (01) 30-37.e2
  • 25 Lewandowski RJ, Kulik LM, Riaz A. et al. A comparative analysis of transarterial downstaging for hepatocellular carcinoma: chemoembolization versus radioembolization. Am J Transplant 2009; 9 (08) 1920-1928
  • 26 Salem R, Lewandowski RJ, Mulcahy MF. et al. Radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma using Yttrium-90 microspheres: a comprehensive report of long-term outcomes. Gastroenterology 2010; 138 (01) 52-64
  • 27 Sangro B, Salem R, Kennedy A, Coldwell D, Wasan H. Radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: a review of the evidence and treatment recommendations. Am J Clin Oncol 2011; 34 (04) 422-431
  • 28 Toskich B, Vidal LL, Olson MT. et al. Pathologic response of hepatocellular carcinoma treated with yttrium-90 glass microsphere radiation segmentectomy prior to liver transplantation: a validation study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2021; 32 (04) 518-526.e1
  • 29 Lencioni R, Della Pina C, Bartolozzi C. Percutaneous image-guided radiofrequency ablation in the therapeutic management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Abdom Imaging 2005; 30 (04) 401-408
  • 30 Salem R, Vouche M, Habib A. et al. Reply: To PMID 24691943. Hepatology 2015; 61 (01) 407
  • 31 Seror O, Nault JC, Nahon P, N'Kontchou G, Trinchet JC. Is segmental transarterial yttrium 90 radiation a curative option for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma ≤5 cm?. Hepatology 2015; 61 (01) 406-407
  • 32 Murthy R, Nunez R, Szklaruk J. et al. Yttrium-90 microsphere therapy for hepatic malignancy: devices, indications, technical considerations, and potential complications. Radiographics 2005; 25 (Suppl. 01) S41-S55
  • 33 Salem R, Lewandowski RJ, Atassi B. et al. Treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with use of 90Y microspheres (TheraSphere): safety, tumor response, and survival. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2005; 16 (12) 1627-1639
  • 34 Salem R, Thurston KG. Radioembolization with 90yttrium microspheres: a state-of-the-art brachytherapy treatment for primary and secondary liver malignancies. Part 1: Technical and methodologic considerations. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2006; 17 (08) 1251-1278
  • 35 Lawrence TS, Robertson JM, Anscher MS, Jirtle RL, Ensminger WD, Fajardo LF. Hepatic toxicity resulting from cancer treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995; 31 (05) 1237-1248
  • 36 Sangro B, Gil-Alzugaray B, Rodriguez J. et al. Liver disease induced by radioembolization of liver tumors: description and possible risk factors. Cancer 2008; 112 (07) 1538-1546
  • 37 Riaz A, Lewandowski RJ, Kulik LM. et al. Complications following radioembolization with yttrium-90 microspheres: a comprehensive literature review. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2009; 20 (09) 1121-1130 quiz 1131
  • 38 Fernandez-Ros N, Iñarrairaegui M, Paramo JA. et al. Radioembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma activates liver regeneration, induces inflammation and endothelial stress and activates coagulation. Liver Int 2015; 35 (05) 1590-1596
  • 39 Atassi B, Bangash AK, Lewandowski RJ. et al. Biliary sequelae following radioembolization with yttrium-90 microspheres. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2008; 19 (05) 691-697
  • 40 Sangro B, Bilbao JI, Boan J. et al. Radioembolization using 90Y-resin microspheres for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006; 66 (03) 792-800
  • 41 Riaz A, Kulik L, Lewandowski RJ. et al. Radiologic-pathologic correlation of hepatocellular carcinoma treated with internal radiation using yttrium-90 microspheres. Hepatology 2009; 49 (04) 1185-1193
  • 42 Salem R, Mazzaferro V, Sangro B. Yttrium 90 radioembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: biological lessons, current challenges, and clinical perspectives. Hepatology 2013; 58 (06) 2188-2197
  • 43 O'Connor PJ, Pasik SD, van der Bom IM, Bishay V, Radaelli A, Kim E. Feasibility of yttrium-90 radioembolization dose calculation utilizing intra-procedural open trajectory cone beam CT. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2020; 43 (02) 295-301